· Private foundation
Price-Downey-Buckland Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of PRICE-DOWNEY-BUCKLAND FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIRELANDS HISTROCIAL SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON | $5,000 |
| JACKSON HOLE ONE FLY FOUNDATION | $4,500 |
| DUCKS UNLIMITED | $3,000 |
| LAKE ERIE COUNCIL | $2,400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| NORWALK CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $1,600 |
| SIMON ACTS | $1,500 |
| FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +149% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JHJACKSON HOLE ONE FLY FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +149%
- NANORWALK AREA UNITED FUND2× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +296%
- AOARTISTS OPEN STUDIO INC2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- SPST PAUL EPISCOPAL CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $5k
- TJTETON JR GOLF ASSOCone grant, 2024 · $4k
- TLTETON LITERACY CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +57%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide a community based visual art center; presenting both films and live performance (including but not limited to theater, music, dance, education programs and master classes) in winterset, iowa.
The mission of the akron zoological foundation, inc. is to directly benefit and provide support for programs, projects and to further the mission of the akron zoological park in conservation, education and serving the community.
To encourage participation and knowledge of the arts for both artists and patrons: to provide education in the visual and performing arts: to plan and execute exhibitions and programs to support this mission.
To maintain the research, preservation and promotion of norwalk history.
To enhance knowledge awareness and participation in the visual arts in the community
To secure the long-term future of the zoo, including its animal collections, education and conservation programs, magnificent gardens and historic wpa-era buildings.
The sole purpose of the humane society foundation is to provide funds and an operating facility for the humane society & spca of hancock county, findlay ohio.
Provide professional live theatre and performing arts for educational and cultural enrichment purposes to the students, residents and visitors of the local community.
Acquisition and maintenance of public land.
Encourage art appreciation
To support and benefit cornell university, more specifically to support the activities and programs of the cornell laboratory of ornithology, an administrative and academic unit of the university.
To provide the finest collaborative environment for: supporting performing arts training and education for a diverse population of youth; nurturing youth from diverse ethnic, cultural, and socioeconomic backgrounds, instilling life-skills…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Norwalk Arts Center Llc and the most unlike its peers is Rileys Angels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIRELANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE ONE FLY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TETON LITERACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND ↗
- Who funds LOVE GROWS LOVE ↗
- Who funds ARTISTS OPEN STUDIO INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds FORMAN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION THE ↗
- Who funds HURON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Monroeville Football Alumni Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Twenty First Century Foundation · Geotrac Charitable Foundation · Huron County Community Foundation · John F & Doris E Ernsthausen Foundation · The Gerard and Patricia Hipp Family Foundation · Norwalk Area United Fund · The Albert G & Olive H Schlink Foundation · Premier Bank Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Price-Downey-Buckland Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.