Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John F & Doris E Ernsthausen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$354k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$744kPhilanthropy$530kCommunity Improvement$100kReligion$60kAnimals$47kArts & Culture$43kRecreation & Sports$30kMembership Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $265k
$19,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND$125,000
NORWALK CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$70,000
NORWALK CITY SCHOOLS$70,000
NORWALK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$20,000
HURON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$19,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$15,000
NORWALK PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
FIRELANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
ARTIST OPEN STUDIO$10,000
HURON COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CLOTHING BANK OF NORWALK OHIO: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 10 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$1.5M
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
-11%

Still filing today

50%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND
    5× · 2021–2025 · $530k · revenue +46% · 54% of their budget
  • HC
    HURON COUNTY GROWTH PARTNERHIP CHARITIES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +69%
  • HC
    HURON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • NP
    NORWALK PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • NA
    NORWALK AREA FRIENDS FOR YOUTH SPORTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -79%
  • TL
    TEEN LEADERSHIP CORPS
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Huron County Growth Partnership

Promote huron county, ohio business

2
Huron County Development Council

Strengthen industrial operations in huron county, ohio

Community Improvement
3
Norwalk Historical Society Inc

To maintain the research, preservation and promotion of norwalk history.

Arts & Culture
4
Norwalk Harbor Keeper
5
Norton Bicentennial Incorporated

To facilitate acquistition of real property to be dedicated to use as a public park in the city of bucyrus, ohio.

Recreation & Sports
6
Granville Ohio Historical Society

The Granville Historical Society acquires, preserves, and shares Granvilles past with residents and visitors to inspire curiosity about, instill knowledge of, and foster a commitment to our history.

7
Norwalk Land Trust Inc

Norwalk land trust seeks to balance nature and development by acquiring land and preserving it in its natural state for the benefit of norwalk residents and future generations.

8
Greater Norwalk Chamber of Commerce Inc

Promotion and support of commercial & civic awareness and activities in the greater norwalk area.

Community Improvement
9
Committee for Our Cleveland Metroparks

Local ballot issue political action committee located in the state of Ohio

10
Huron County Community Foundation

The mission of the huron county community foundation is to provide for the enrichment of the quality life in huron county by developing a permanent endowment to assess and respond to changing community needs and by serving as a charitable…

Philanthropy
11
Norwalk High School Parents Club
Education
12
North Central Ohio Land Conservancy Inc

Protecting natural areas in Ohio through conservation easements and public education regarding the importance of natural areas.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Clothing Bank of Norwalk Ohio and the most unlike its peers is Artists Open Studio Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORWALK CITY SCHOOLS — $330,000 · OtherNORWALK CITY SCHOOLSNORWALK CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $305,000 · OtherNORWALK CATHOLIC SCHOOLNORWALK PUBLIC LIBRARY — $84,000 · OtherNORWALK PUBLIC LIBRARYFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $60,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH+4 more — $55,000 · Other+4 moreNORWALK AREA UNITED FUND — $530,000 · PhilanthropyNORWALK AREA UNITED FUNDHURON COUNTY GROWTH PARTNERHIP CHARITIES — $100,000 · Community ImprovementHURON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $47,340 · AnimalsFIRELANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $32,646 · Arts & CultureARTISTS OPEN STUDIO INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureNORWALK AREA FRIENDS FOR YOUTH SPORTS INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTEEN LEADERSHIP CORPS — $6,000 · EducationTHE CLOTHING BANK OF NORWALK OHIO — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$834,000Philanthropy$530,000Community Improvement$100,000Animals$47,340Arts & Culture$42,646Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$6,000Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORWALK AREA UNITED FUND — $530,000 over 5y, 54% of budgetHURON COUNTY GROWTH PARTNERHIP CHARITIES — $100,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetHURON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $47,340 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetFIRELANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $32,646 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetTHE NORWALK CEMETERY ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetNORWALK AREA FRIENDS FOR YOUTH SPORTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetTEEN LEADERSHIP CORPS — $6,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE CLOTHING BANK OF NORWALK OHIO — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND
  • Who funds HURON COUNTY GROWTH PARTNERHIP CHARITIES
  • Who funds HURON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds FIRELANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE NORWALK CEMETERY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds NORWALK AREA FRIENDS FOR YOUTH SPORTS INC
  • Who funds ARTISTS OPEN STUDIO INC
  • Who funds TEEN LEADERSHIP CORPS
  • Who funds THE CLOTHING BANK OF NORWALK OHIO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Twenty First Century FoundationOH22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Twenty First Century Foundation · Geotrac Charitable Foundation · The Albert G & Olive H Schlink Foundation · Price-Downey-Buckland Foundation · The Gerard and Patricia Hipp Family Foundation · Fisher-Titus Medical Center · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John F & Doris E Ernsthausen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph