Skip to content
Prevention Michigan at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Prevention Michigan

Cultivate healthy communities across michigan through resourses, technical assistance, and support.

$515k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$78k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.9MCommunity Improvement$649kHuman Services$449kCrime & Legal$269kYouth Development$175kEducation$141kArts & Culture$88kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $496,137, the rows itemized in this filing. The $515,216 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $19,079 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $379k
$58,362
Median grant
1
States reached
$987k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL$78,142
THE YOUTH CONNECTION$65,238
OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INC$61,491
LEADERS ADVANCING HEALTHY COMMUNITIES$60,408
THE EMPOWERMENT ZONE COALITION$58,362
REGION 6 PREVENTION COLLABORATIVE$55,733
GENESEE COUNTY PREVENTION COALITION$40,438
GREAT LAKES RECOVERY MISSION$39,629
GREATER FLINT HEALTH COALITION$36,696
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $653k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GRAND TRAVERSE COUNTY DRUG FREE COALITION: $7k → 10%OTTAWA SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION COALITIONARBOR CIRCLE: $46k → 11%CATHOLIC HUMAN SERVICES: $100k → 11%SERENITY HOUSE OF FLINT: $15k → 16%OTTAWA SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION COALITIONARBOR CIRCLE: $39k → 11%IOSCO SUBSTANCE FREE COALITION: $57k → 11%LIVE WELL KALKASKA SUBSTANCE FREE COALITION: $49k → 11%CRAWFORD PARTNERSHIP FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION: $46k → 11%PRESQUE ISLE HUMAN SERVICES COORDINATING COUNCIL: $37k → 11%ALLIANCE OF COALITIONS FOR HEALTHY: $9k → 8%ALPENA PREVENTION POLICY BOARD - UP NORTH PREVENTION: $35k → 11%PULLING TOGETHER CHEBOYGAN SUBSTANCE-FREE COALITION: $28k → 11%MONTMORENCY SUBSTANCE FREE COALITION: $26k → 11%ALCONA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE: $25k → 11%ROSCOMMON COUNTY DRUG FREE COALITION: $12k → 11%DRUG-FREE COALITION OF OGEMAW COUNTYCATHOLIC HUMAN SERVICES: $7k → 11%INNER CITY YOUTH GROUP: $12k → 21%ACCESS: $11k → 21%URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVES: $6k → 21%URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVES: $6k → 21%THE FAMILY CENTER OF GROSSE POINTE AND HARPER WOODS: $51k → 21%THE FAMILY CENTER OF GROSSE POINTE AND HARPER WOODS: $29k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Prevention Michigan’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 75%.

Prevention Michiganlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 48 repeat orgs$641k to everyone else

48 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
53

Total granted

$5.1M
$641k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+39%

Still filing today

54%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EZ
    Empowerment Zone CoalitionInc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $276k · revenue +68%
  • LAHC - LEADERS ADVANCING AND HELPING COMMUNITIES
    4× · 2020–2025 · $267k · revenue +190%
  • GC
    GENESEE COUNTY PREVENTION COALITION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $236k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • HY
    HEALTHY YOUTH COALITION OF MARINETTE & MENOMINEE COUNTIESMENOMINEE COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $71k
  • DH
    DIAL HELP INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2023 · $43k · revenue 0%
  • FA
    FAMILIES AGAINST NARCOTICS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $32k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harm Reduction Michigan

The mission of harm reduction is to reduce substance abuse and related activities in a respectful manner in collaboration with the user

Health
2
Greater Detroit Community Outreach Center inc

Greater Detroit Community Outreach Center is a community based nonprofit organization designed to help prevent teen parenthood among school age youth. The center has a staff of outreach representatives who go into the homes with children…

Human Services
3
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
4
Community Health Initiatives

Adolesence Drug Rehabilation

Youth Development
5
Active Community Health Center of Broward Inc

We are and Agency created on the fundamental value that strengthening one family at a time will transform our community as a whole. we believe that all people should have access to behavioral healt servicesa and to live a fulfilling life.…

—
6
Prevention Michigan

Cultivate healthy communities across michigan through resourses, technical assistance, and support.

Civil Rights
7
Henry County Prevention Coalition

Empowering the community through prevention, education, and leadership roles in reducing alcohol, tobacco, illegal drugs, and other harmful behaviors amoung our youth and families

Education
8
Saginaw County Youth Protection Council

To empower and support children and families in reaching their full potential and becoming self-sufficient, saving lives and creating futures through educational enrichment and shelter services.

Human Services
9
Lakes Area Community Coalition

Building a healthy, vibrant, drug-free community in the lakes area by reducing risk factors and promoting protective factors around youth to prevent underage substance use and addiction.

Health
10
Detroit Recovery Project

To support recovery which strengthens, rebuilds, and empowers individuals, families, and communities who are experiencing co-occuring mental illness, and substance use disorders. drp achieves this by ensuring access to integrated networks…

Human Services
11
Community Counseling Center of Ashtabula County

Community counseling center is a non-profit behavioral health provider focused on engaging the community in recovery.

Health
12
Care of Southeastern Michigan

To strengthen resiliency in people and their communities through prevention, education, and services that improve the quality of life

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Guidance Center; the most unlike its peers is Families Against Narcotics Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/50
Grantees still filing
39/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DHD #10: $235,945 · OtherDHD #10SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL: $221,109 · OtherSUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCILHEALTH DEPARTMENT OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN: $189,176 · OtherHEALTH DEPARTMENT OF NORTHWEST MICHIGANGREAT LAKES RECOVERY MISSION: $144,636 · OtherGREAT LAKES RECOVERY MISSIONNEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES MICH: $92,061 · OtherMONTCALM PREVENTION COLLABORATIVE INC: $91,470 · Other+64 more: $1,696,167 · Other+64 moreGENESEE COUNTY PREVENTION COALITION: $235,850 · HealthGENESEE COUNTY PREVENTIO…TEN SIXTEEN RECOVERY NETWORK: $188,380 · HealthTEN SIXTEEN RECOVERY NET…OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INC: $165,019 · HealthOAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INCGREATER FLINT HEALTH COALITION INC: $146,405 · HealthGREATER FLINT HEALTH COA…PREVENTION WORKS INC: $111,374 · HealthPREVENTION WORKS INCTHE GUIDANCE CENTER: $101,251 · HealthTHE GUIDANCE CENTERMUSKEGON COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT: $91,111 · HealthMUSKEGON COMMUNITY HEALT…MCLAREN BAY REGION: $82,806 · HealthMCLAREN BAY REGIONBWROC INC: $53,358 · Health+2 more: $40,201 · HealthCATHOLIC HUMAN SERVICES INC: $430,402 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC HUM…THE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $84,731 · Human ServicesTHE ARBOR CI…THE FAMILY CENTER OF GROSSE POINTE & HARPER WOODS: $79,820 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY C…+5 more: $58,373 · Human Services+5 moreEmpowerment Zone CoalitionInc: $276,444 · Community ImprovementEmpowerme…MAKING IT COUNT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $76,459 · Community ImprovementMAKING IT…GROW BENZIE INC: $70,622 · Community ImprovementGROW BENZ…Novi Community Coalition: $62,524 · Community ImprovementNovi Comm…+1 more: $7,500 · Community ImprovementLAHC - LEADERS ADVANCING AND HELPING COMMUNITIES: $267,024 · Arts & CulturePiast Institute A National Institute for Polish and Polish American Affairs: $75,302 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $7,140 · Arts & CultureThe Youth Connection Inc: $200,250 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CENTER FOR URBAN YOUTH AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $53,414 · Youth DevelopmentMichigan Urban Youth Alliance: $86,954 · Crime & LegalWELLSPRING: $7,839 · Crime & LegalWAI-IAM INC: $5,645 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,670,564Health$1,215,755Human Services$653,326Community Improvement$493,549Arts & Culture$349,466Youth Development$253,664Crime & Legal$100,438

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC HUMAN SERVICES INC: $430,402 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetEmpowerment Zone CoalitionInc: $276,444 over 3y, 23% of budgetLAHC - LEADERS ADVANCING AND HELPING COMMUNITIES: $267,024 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetGENESEE COUNTY PREVENTION COALITION: $235,850 over 3y, 20% of budgetSUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL: $221,109 over 3y, 18% of budgetThe Youth Connection Inc: $200,250 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetTEN SIXTEEN RECOVERY NETWORK: $188,380 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetGREATER FLINT HEALTH COALITION INC: $146,405 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPREVENTION WORKS INC: $111,374 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTHE GUIDANCE CENTER: $101,251 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUSKEGON COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT: $91,111 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMichigan Urban Youth Alliance: $86,954 over 2y, 53% of budgetTHE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $84,731 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGRATIOT COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY ASSOCIATION: $84,038 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetMCLAREN BAY REGION: $82,806 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION SERVICES: $82,545 over 2y, 22% of budgetTHE FAMILY CENTER OF GROSSE POINTE & HARPER WOODS: $79,820 over 2y, 26% of budgetMAKING IT COUNT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $76,459 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetPiast Institute A National Institute for Polish and Polish American Affairs: $75,302 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetGROW BENZIE INC: $70,622 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE DETROIT ASSOC OF BLACK ORG: $63,917 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNovi Community Coalition: $62,524 over 3y, 17% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR URBAN YOUTH AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $53,414 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetBWROC INC: $53,358 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetALGER COUNTY COMMUNITIES THAT CARE: $51,865 over 2y, 35% of budgetDIAL HELP INCORPORATED: $43,125 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetCENTERS FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT INC: $26,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFACE ADDICTION NOW WASHTENAW COUNTY CHAPTER: $20,500 over 1y, 21% of budgetRANDY'S HOUSE: $19,701 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLATINO FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetThe Serenity House of Flint: $14,793 over 1y, 14% of budgetALKEBU-LAN VILLAGE: $12,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetUrban Neighborhood Initiatives Inc: $11,887 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S: $10,533 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON HEIGHTS COMMUNITY COALITION: $9,631 over 1y, 22% of budgetALLIANCE OF COALITIONS FOR HEALTHY COMMUNITIES: $8,760 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS: $8,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SHIAWASSEE AND GENESEE COUNTIES: $8,050 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWELLSPRING: $7,839 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetChildren of the Rising Sun EC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHENRY FORD II HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: $7,500 over 1y, 10% of budgetCONGRESS OF COMMUNITIES: $7,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $7,140 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDOM FREEDOM GROWERS NON PROFIT SERVICE CORP: $5,938 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMATRIX HUMAN SERVICES: $5,882 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAI-IAM INC: $5,645 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $5,280 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way for Southe…Michigan Health Endow…Community Foundation …The Skillman Foundati…DTE Energy FoundationChildren's Hospital o…Wayne-Metropolitan Co…WK Kellogg FoundationComerica Charitable F…Ford PhilanthropyThe Kresge FoundationMichigan Physical Fit…
United Way for Southeastern MichiganMI31.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Skillman Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation · Wayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Comerica Charitable Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · The Kresge Foundation · Michigan Physical Fitness Health and Sports Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prevention Michigan funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prevention Michigan. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Prevention Michigan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home