Skip to content
Preston M Green Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Preston M Green Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$870k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.8MEducation$1.9MHealth$745kInternational$110kAnimals$110kHuman Services$50kReligion$1k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
  • $250k+1 grant · $700k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WINTER OPERA ST LOUIS$700,000
MISSOURI BAPTIST HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$100,000
AMERICAN PRIVATE RADIO$70,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $30k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 32% of Preston M Green Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 66% of the giving stays in MO; by stated purpose, 64%.

Preston M Green Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 10 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$3.7M
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthReligionAnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WO
    WINTER OPERA ST LOUIS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +153% · 53% of their budget
  • MT
    MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +176%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $425k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • GO
    GIFTS OF LOVE HAITI
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +7%
  • CF
    CRUDEM FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +136%
  • RN
    REACH NETWORK
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
8
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
9
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
10
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
11
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
12
Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Society of Missouri; the most unlike its peers is Shriners Hospital for Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WINTER OPERA ST LOUIS: $1,687,500 · Arts & CultureWINTER OPERA ST LOUISMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS+1 more: $70,000 · Arts & CultureHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,800,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $130,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYAmerican Heart Association Inc: $425,000 · HealthAmerican Hea…MISSOURI BAPTIST HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $150,000 · HealthMISSOURI BAP…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $50,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER…SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $120,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $60,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $50,000 · AnimalsGIFTS OF LOVE HAITI: $100,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · International
Arts & Culture$2,757,500Education$1,930,000Health$625,000Philanthropy$120,000Animals$110,000Religion$101,000Human Services$50,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,800,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWINTER OPERA ST LOUIS: $1,687,500 over 6y, 53% of budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $1,000,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $425,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI BAPTIST HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $130,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIFTS OF LOVE HAITI: $100,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetREACH NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Preston M Green Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Preston M Green Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Preston M Green’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home