Skip to content
Prelutsky-Jasper Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Prelutsky-Jasper Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$25kHealth$3kPhilanthropy$2kEducation$302Human Services$138Arts & Culture$68Food & Nutrition$60International$50Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
3
States reached
$108k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED HEBREW CONGREGATION$4,086
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$1,000
AISH HATORAH$682
JEWISH FEDERATION ST LOUIS$650
BLUES FOR KIDS$300
DOORWAYS$203
LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION$100
AREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES$65
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$27
PEDAL THE CAUSE$26
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $100 → 6%BLUES FOR KIDS: $300 → 21%AREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES: $65 → 21%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $36 → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $26 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34k · 10 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
22

Total granted

$34k
$912

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+57%

Still filing today

30%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $721 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue +8%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2020–2025 · $1k · revenue +43%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $54 · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • FX
    FRAGILE X
    one grant, 2022 · $103
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA
    one grant, 2024 · $100
  • TN
    THE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $100 · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
6
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
9
Bjc Health System Group Return

The 24 licensed hospitals and service organizations of bjc healthcare serve the healthcare needs of the residents of metropolitan st. louis and kansas city, mid-missouri, eastern kansas and southern illinois. based in urban, suburban, and…

Health
10
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
11
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
12
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Franklin County Humane Society of Missouri. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED HEBREW CONGREGATION: $23,560 · OtherUNITED HEBREW CONGREGATIONAISH HATORAH: $6,074 · OtherAISH HATORAHAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $1,488 · Other+13 more: $729 · OtherJewish Federation of St Louis: $2,707 · Philanthropy+1 more: $50 · PhilanthropyThe Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children: $1,050 · HealthINTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/A DOORWAYS: $203 · HealthTHE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION: $100 · Health+7 more: $192 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,036 · Human ServicesBLUES FOR KIDS: $300 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $100 · Human ServicesAREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES: $65 · Human Services+1 more: $26 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $54 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $38 · EducationMaryville University - St Louis: $20 · EducationOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $60 · Food & NutritionThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $18 · Arts & CultureFRANKLIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $18 · Animals
Other$31,851Philanthropy$2,757Health$1,545Human Services$1,527Education$112Food & Nutrition$60Arts & Culture$18Animals$18

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJewish Federation of St Louis: $2,707 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children: $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,036 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/A DOORWAYS: $203 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES: $65 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $54 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMMANUEL'S HAMMER INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $38 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $27 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $26 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY TO HOPE: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaryville University - St Louis: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

World Wide Technology…The Blackbaud Giving …The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
World Wide Technology FoundationMO13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: World Wide Technology Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prelutsky-Jasper Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prelutsky-Jasper Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Prelutsky-Jasper Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home