Skip to content
Pratt Family Legacy Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Pratt Family Legacy Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2026still arriving
4
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$111kPhilanthropy$70kArts & Culture$18kHealth$17kEducation$9kCivil Rights$8kReligion$7kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2026 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $73k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC$43,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
CIRCLE MATCH$5,000
CATSKILL ART SOCIETY$4,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH A LLIANCE: $17k → 6%WATER DEFENSE: $38k → 16%ROBINHOOD FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%THE GOTHAM FIM & MEDIA INSTITUTE: $15k → 20%UTAH FILM MAKER: $30k → 8%LIONS CLUB: $1k → 7%CIRCLE MATCH: $5k → 14%CATSKILL ART SPACE: $5k → 16%WE THE PROTESTERS INC: $5k → 17%CATSKILL ART SOCIETY: $5k → 16%ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $35k → 17%CATSKILL ART SPACE: $3k → 16%ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%CATSKILL ART SOCIETY: $3k → 16%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $3k → 16%CATSKILL FLY FISHING MUESEUM: $2k → 16%THE PRASAD PROJECT INC: $3k → 16%CATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC: $43k → 16%CATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC: $37k → 16%CATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC: $25k → 16%CATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC: $4k → 16%HURLEYVILLE METHODIST CHURCH: $4k → 16%PRASAD PROJECT INC: $1k → 16%SYDA FOUNDATION: $127k → 16%SYDA FOUNDATION: $65k → 16%SYDA FOUNDATION: $60k → 16%SYDA FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%SYDA FOUNDATION: $48k → 16%HOMESTEAD SCHOOL SULLIVAN: $6k → 16%FRIENDS OF THE HOMESTEAD SCHOOL: $5k → 16%HOMESTEAD SCHOOL SULLIVAN FUND: $3k → 16%FRIENDS OF THE HOMESTEAD SCHOOL: $1k → 16%FRIENDS OF THE HOMESTEAD SCHOOL: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$554k · 7 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$554k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
0%

Still filing today

57%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationCivil RightsInternationalEnvironmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC
    4× · 2023–2026 · $108k · revenue +18%
  • RH
    ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue +34%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE HOMESTEAD SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • WD
    WATER DEFENSE INC CO ALTMAN GREENFIELD SELVAGGI LLP
    one grant, 2017 · $38k · revenue -99%
  • FA
    FRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2024 · $17k · revenue 0%
  • TG
    THE GOTHAM FIM & MEDIA INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2025 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Home Planet Fund

None

Environment
3
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
4
Center for Arms Control and

A nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to enhancing international peace and security in the 21st century, thereby retaining its focus on nuclear weapons but expanding to include other present emerging security threats.

International
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
Parenteral Drug Association Inc

To develop scientifically sound, practical technical information and resources to advance science and regulation for the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industry through the expertise of our global membership.

—
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
9
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Maine

Mission - the aclu of maine works to support bills that advance civil rights and civil liberties and oppose bills that would curtail them. we also provide voter education about how to vote and voting rights at the polls. we do not endorse…

—
11
New York League of Conservation Voters

See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…

—
12
Friends of the Earth (Action) Inc

To improve the environment through education and policy work, with an emphasis on pollution, climate change, and energy issues; and how congress and the administration stand on these issues.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is We the Protesters Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SYDA FOUNDATION: $350,000 · OtherSYDA FOUNDATIONWATER DEFENSE INC CO ALTMAN GREENFIELD SELVAGGI LLP: $37,500 · OtherWATER DEFENSE INC CO ALTMAN GREENFIELD SELVAGGI LLPIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+10 more: $46,650 · Other+10 moreCATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC: $108,150 · EnvironmentCATSKILL MOUNTAIN…ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $70,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD …FRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE: $16,500 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE HOMESTEAD SCHOOL INC: $7,250 · EducationHOMESTEAD SCHOOL SULLIVAN: $6,000 · EducationWE THE PROTESTERS INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Civil RightsCATSKILL ART SOCIETY INC: $7,200 · Arts & Culture
Other$464,150Environment$108,150Philanthropy$70,000Health$16,500Education$13,250Civil Rights$7,500Arts & Culture$7,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC: $108,150 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWATER DEFENSE INC CO ALTMAN GREENFIELD SELVAGGI LLP: $37,500 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetFRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE: $16,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HOMESTEAD SCHOOL INC: $7,250 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetCATSKILL ART SOCIETY INC: $7,200 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHOMESTEAD SCHOOL SULLIVAN: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWE THE PROTESTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PRASAD PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pratt Family Legacy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pratt Family Legacy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pratt Family Legacy Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pratt Family Legacy Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pratt Family Legacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home