Skip to content

· Private foundation

Powell Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$90k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$186kEducation$106kHousing & Shelter$51kHuman Services$43kFood & Nutrition$33kHealth$26kPublic Benefit$5k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAMBER MUSIC NORTHWEST$55,000
COLLEGE POSSIBLE OREGON$10,000
CENTRAL CITY CONCERN$9,000
POWER TO DECIDE$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC$1,500
CEDARWOOD SCHOOL$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIAWILLAMETTE INC$1,000
THE DOUGY CENTER$1,000
DE LA SALLE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
OUTSIDE IN$1,000
SMART READING$1,000
AL FORTHAN MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP CO VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OREGON$1,000
VIRGINIA GRACIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION$1,000
RETURNING VETERANS PROJECT$750
KAIROSPDX$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%POWER TO DECIDE: $8k → 14%POWER TO DECIDE: $8k → 14%POWER TO DECIDE: $8k → 14%POWER TO DECIDE: $8k → 14%POWER TO DECIDE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$424k · 19 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$424k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+83%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHAMBER MUSIC NORTHWEST
    4× · 2020–2024 · $180k · revenue +73%
  • Central City Concern
    8× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +111%
  • PT
    POWER TO DECIDE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • PC
    PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Wallace Medical Concern

We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

—
2
Portland Street Medicine

We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.

Health
3
Careoregon Inc

To inspire and partner to create quality and equity in individual and community health.

Health
4
Penobscot Community Health Center

Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…

Health
5
Coalition of Community Health Clinics

The mission of the coalition of community health clinics is to improve healthcare for vulnerable populations residing in the portland-metro area. we strengthen community clinics, promote health equity, and foster collaboration across the…

Health
6
Sea Mar Community Health Centers

Sea mar community health centers is a community-based organization committed to providing quality, comprehensive health, human, housing, educational, and cultural services to diverse communities, specializing in service to latinos.

Health
7
Cascade Aids Project

We promote well-being and advance equity by providing inclusive health and wellness services for lgbtq+ people, people affected by hiv, and all those seeking compassionate care.

Health
8
Volunteers in Medicine Clinic of the Cascades

To improve the health and wellness of the medically uninsured or critically underserved through the engagement of professionals, community partners, and dedicated volunteers.

Health
9
Providence Health & Services - Oregon

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
10
Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment
11
Oregon Medical Association

The mission of the oma is to speak as the unified voice of medicine in oregon; advocate for a sustainable, equitable, and accessible healthcare environment; and energize physicians and physician assistants by building and supporting their…

—
12
Open Door Community Health Centers

Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc; the most unlike its peers is Power to Decide. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHAMBER MUSIC NORTHWEST: $180,000 · Arts & CultureCHAMBER MUSIC NORTHWEST+1 more: $4,000 · Arts & CultureCOLLEGE POSSIBLE OREGON: $60,000 · OtherCOLLEGE POSSIBLE OREGONOREGON FOOD BANK: $26,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKPORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $25,000 · OtherPORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGEOUTSIDE IN: $10,750 · OtherOUTSIDE INTHE DOUGY CENTER INC: $8,000 · OtherAL FORTHAN MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP CO VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OREGON: $6,500 · OtherDE LA SALLE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $6,500 · Other+4 more: $10,250 · Other+4 moreCentral City Concern: $51,250 · HealthCentral City Co…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC: $8,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthPOWER TO DECIDE: $35,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $7,000 · Food & NutritionKAIROSPDX: $3,500 · EducationSMART READING: $2,000 · EducationRETURNING VETERANS PROJECT: $5,250 · Public Benefit
Arts & Culture$184,000Other$153,000Health$60,250Human Services$35,000Food & Nutrition$7,000Education$5,500Public Benefit$5,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAMBER MUSIC NORTHWEST: $180,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetCentral City Concern: $51,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPOWER TO DECIDE: $35,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $26,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOUTSIDE IN: $10,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOUGY CENTER INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRETURNING VETERANS PROJECT: $5,250 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHAMBER MUSIC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKAIROSPDX: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSouthwest Community Health Center: $2,250 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSMART READING: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHAMBER MUSIC NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds Central City Concern ↗
  • Who funds POWER TO DECIDE ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds OUTSIDE IN ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DOUGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds RETURNING VETERANS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CHAMBER MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds KAIROSPDX ↗
  • Who funds Southwest Community Health Center ↗
  • Who funds SMART READING ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

OCF Joseph E Weston Public FoundationOR17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Hoover Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Powell Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Powell Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Outside in: 29% of income from government
  • Kairospdx: 22% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 12% of income from government
  • Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center: 11% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Central City Concern: 7% of income from government
  • Smart Reading: 4% of income from government
  • Chamber Music Northwest: 2% of income from government
  • The Dougy Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Friends of Chamber Music: 1% of income from government
  • Meals On Wheels People Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Powell Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Powell Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Powell’s filings →

More from the funding graph