Skip to content

· Private foundation

Potts Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$318kPhilanthropy$26kArts & Culture$25kRecreation & Sports$21kEnvironment$9kReligion$8kHealth$5kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $44k
$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$316k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UVA Medical School$17,000
The Shipley School$15,000
University of Virginia$12,000
The Haverford School$6,000
Friends of Princeton Wrestling$5,000
Princeton University$3,000
Summit Foundation$3,000
Lakes Region Food Pantry$3,000
Princeton Wrestling Club$3,000
Mainline Arts Center$3,000
Garden Club of Philadelphia$2,000
Princeton Club of SW Florida$2,000
Community Foundation of Collier Cty$1,000
Fountain Valley School of Colorado$1,000
Home Base Kensington$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Potts Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Potts Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$386k · 20 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$386k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+60%

Still filing today

60%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SHIPLEY SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +18%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    5× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +5%
  • HS
    HAVERFORD SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +60%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PRINCETON WRESTING
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • FA
    Fletcher Annual Fund - Tufts Univer
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
2
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
3
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
4
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
5
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
6
Sonoma Charter School

Sonoma charter school seeks to achieve academic excellence through engaged learning in a setting that involves students, teachers, and parents.

Education
7
Hillbrook School

Hillbrook provides an extraordinary educational experience that fosters a love of learning in our students and helps them to develop the knowledge, skills and confidence to achieve their highest individual potential in school and in life.…

Education
8
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
9
Hampshire Country School

Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…

—
10
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
11
The Rippowam Cisqua School Inc

Rippowam Cisqua School creates independent thinkers, confident communicators, and engaged leaders who respect and contribute meaningfully to a diverse and increasingly complex global society.

Education
12
Morristown-Beard School

Morristown beard school is an educational college preparatory school in grades 6 to 12 located in morristown, new jersey.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Summit Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Main Line Art Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHIPLEY SCHOOL: $80,000 · EducationSHIPLEY SCHOOLThe Trustees of Princeton University: $62,971 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton UniversityHAVERFORD SCHOOL: $40,029 · EducationHAVERFORD SCHOOL+3 more: $13,000 · Education+3 moreUVA Medical School: $70,000 · OtherUVA Medical SchoolUniversity of Virginia: $60,000 · OtherUniversity of VirginiaFriends of Princeton Wrestling: $11,971 · OtherFriends of Princeton WrestlingCHURCH OF THE REDEEMER: $8,000 · OtherCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Other+10 more: $21,029 · Other+10 moreTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $19,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyMain Line Art Center: $9,000 · Arts & CulturePRINCETON WRESTLING CLUB INC: $9,000 · Recreation & SportsSQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · EnvironmentSQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $1,000 · EnvironmentSQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER: $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Health
Education$196,000Other$177,000Philanthropy$19,500Arts & Culture$9,000Recreation & Sports$9,000Environment$9,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHIPLEY SCHOOL: $80,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $62,971 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHAVERFORD SCHOOL: $40,029 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMain Line Art Center: $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPRINCETON WRESTLING CLUB INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO: $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BUSH SCHOOL: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEPIPHANY SCHOOL: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEFFERSON SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHIPLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds HAVERFORD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Main Line Art Center ↗
  • Who funds PRINCETON WRESTLING CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BUSH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LAKES REGION FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds EPIPHANY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY16.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pamela and Laurence Tarica Foundation · The Schifrin Foundation Inc · Lovett-Woodsum Foundation Inc · The William Penn Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Boston Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Potts Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Potts Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Potts Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph