Skip to content

· Private foundation

Porter Sesnon Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2020
14
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Environment$42kArts & Culture$26kAnimals$23kInternational$16kRecreation & Sports$8kHealth$4kHousing & Shelter$4kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2020 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTA CRUZ ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION$4,000
LAND TRUST OF SC COUNTY$4,000
SISKIYOU LAND TRUST$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
ONE WORLD CHILDREN'S FUND$4,000
ANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATION$2,500
MOUNTAIN LION FOUNDATION$1,000
HOMELESS SERVICE CENTER$1,000
PAWS$1,000
SEMPERVIRENS FUND$1,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$1,000
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
CAPE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SEMPERVIRENS FUND: $2k → 8%ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $1k → 9%BASIC: $3k → 10%ONE WORLD CHILDREN'S FUND: $5k → 10%BORREGO ART INSTITUTE: $6k → 11%SANTA CRUZ ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION: $4k → 13%SISKIYOU LAND TRUST: $6k → 16%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $1k → 14%SEMPERVIRENS FUND: $1k → 8%ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $1k → 9%BASIC: $1k → 10%ONE WORLD CHILDREN'S FUND: $5k → 10%BORREGO ART INSTITUTE: $6k → 11%SANTA CRUZ ANIMAL SHELTHER FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%SISKIYOU LAND TRUST: $4k → 16%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $1k → 14%SEMPERVIRENS FUND: $1k → 8%ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $1k → 9%ONE WORLD CHILDREN'S FUND: $4k → 10%ANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%SANTA CRUZ ANIMAL SHELTHER FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%SISKIYOU LAND TRUST: $1k → 16%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $1k → 14%SEMPERVIRENS FUND: $1k → 8%ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $1k → 9%ONE WORLD CHILDREN'S FUND: $2k → 10%CHRISTMAS CIRCLE COMMUNITY PARK: $5k → 11%SHAKESPEARE SANTA CRUZ NSC GRANT: $5k → 13%SISKIYOU LAND TRUST: $1k → 16%CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%ANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%UCSC - MARY PORTER SESNON AND PINO ALTO: $4k → 13%CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%BSUSD: $1k → 11%LAND TRUST OF SC COUNTY: $4k → 13%CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%LAND TRUST OF SC COUNTY: $4k → 13%PAWS: $1k → 10%LAND TRUST OF SC COUNTY: $3k → 13%PAWS: $1k → 10%LAND TRUST OF SC COUNTY: $3k → 13%PAWS: $1k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 13%PAWS: $1k → 10%HOMELESS SERVICES CENTER: $1k → 13%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 13%HOMELESS SERVICES CENTER: $1k → 13%HOMELESS SERVICE CENTER: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 19 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
5

Total granted

$125k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+57%

Still filing today

68%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
AnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SISKIYOU LAND TRUST
    4× · 2017–2020 · $12k · revenue +663%
  • AF
    ANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2020 · $8k · revenue +63%
  • SC
    Santa Cruz SPCA and Humane Society
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • SS
    SHAKESPEARE SANTA CRUZ NSC GRANT
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CC
    Christmas Circle Community Parkgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +57%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF OLYMPIA STATION INC DBA TANDY BEAL & COMPANY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Wildlife Foundation

The foundation works with diverse groups representing many interests to acquire and restore critical wildlife habitat and protecting species

Animals
2
Volcan Mountain Foundation

The Volcan Mountain Foundation's mission is to preserve Volcan Mountain Range in its natural state for all generations.

—
3
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
4
Sierra Foothill Conservancy

Protect, manage and preserve lands and wildlife having unique natural resources and cultural qualities within and near the foothills of the sierra nevada range.

Environment
5
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
6
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
7
The Wildlands Conservancy

The Wildlands Conservancy's dual mission is to preserve the beauty and biodiversity of the earth and to provide programs so that children may know the wonder and joy of nature.

Environment
8
Wilderness Conservation Foundation
Environment
9
Big Sur Land Trust

The mission of the Big Sur Land Trust is to inspire love of the land and conservation of our treasured landscapes.

Environment
10
Save Mount Diablo

Save mount diablo's mission is to preserve mount diablo's peaks, surrounding foothills, and watersheds; and its sustaining diablo range, through land acquisition and preservation strategies designed to protect the mountain's natural…

Recreation & Sports
11
The Land Trust for Santa Barbara County

To conserve natural resources, agricultural land and open spaces for present and future generations.

Environment
12
Wild Earth Society Incorporated

Wildlands Network works to reconnect, restore and rewild North America so that life-in all its diversity-can thrive.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California State Parks Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Olympia Station Inc Dba Tandy Beal & Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAND TRUST OF SC COUNTY: $14,000 · OtherLAND TRUST OF SC COUNTYTHE SISKIYOU LAND TRUST: $12,000 · OtherTHE SISKIYOU LAND TRUSTIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATIONSHAKESPEARE SANTA CRUZ NSC GRANT: $5,000 · OtherSHAKESPEARE SANTA CRUZ NSC GRANTBASIC: $4,200 · OtherBASICPAWS: $4,000 · OtherPAWSPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODHOUSING MATTERS: $4,000 · OtherHOUSING MATTERSUCSC - MARY PORTER SESNON AND PINO ALTO: $3,500 · OtherCAPE: $2,500 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherSanta Cruz SPCA and Humane Society: $7,000 · AnimalsSanta Cruz SPCA a…SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION: $7,000 · AnimalsSANTA CRUZ COUNTY…ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $4,000 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL DEFE…Mountain Lion Foundation: $4,000 · AnimalsMountain Lion Fou…+1 more: $750 · AnimalsBorrego Art Institute: $12,000 · Arts & CultureBorrego Art I…FRIENDS OF OLYMPIA STATION INC DBA TANDY BEAL & COMPANY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF OL…One World Childrens Fund: $16,000 · PhilanthropyOne World Ch…SEMPERVIRENS FUND: $5,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3,000 · EnvironmentChristmas Circle Community Park: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$72,700Animals$22,750Arts & Culture$17,000Philanthropy$16,000Environment$8,000Recreation & Sports$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOne World Childrens Fund: $16,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SISKIYOU LAND TRUST: $12,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetBorrego Art Institute: $12,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSanta Cruz SPCA and Humane Society: $7,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA CRUZ COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSEMPERVIRENS FUND: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChristmas Circle Community Park: $5,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF OLYMPIA STATION INC DBA TANDY BEAL & COMPANY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHOUSING MATTERS: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMountain Lion Foundation: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds One World Childrens Fund ↗
  • Who funds THE SISKIYOU LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Borrego Art Institute ↗
  • Who funds ANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Santa Cruz SPCA and Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEMPERVIRENS FUND ↗
  • Who funds Christmas Circle Community Park ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF OLYMPIA STATION INC DBA TANDY BEAL & COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING MATTERS ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Mountain Lion Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Santa Cruz CountyCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Santa Cruz County · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Porter Sesnon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Porter Sesnon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Porter Sesnon Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Porter Sesnon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Porter Sesnon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph