Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pope-Brown Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$578kEducation$146kHuman Services$37kHealth$20k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $59k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FDN$30,000
USC EDUCATIONAL FDN$19,000
ETV ENDOWMENT OF SC INC$10,000
THE BELTON AREA MUSEUM ASSOCI$7,500
SC HISTORICAL SOCIETY$6,000
ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES$5,500
PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
BELTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS$3,000
LIVING WATER FOUNDATION$2,000
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%SC HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 12%ETV ENDOWMENT OF SC INC: $18k → 15%THE BELTON AREA MUSEUM ASSOCI: $10k → 15%PALMETTO TR FOR HISTORICAL PRESERVA: $5k → 16%PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%SC HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 12%ETV ENDOWMENT OF SC INC: $12k → 15%THE BELTON AREA MUSEUM ASSOCI: $10k → 15%PALMETTO TR FOR HISTORICAL PRESERVA: $5k → 16%PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%SC HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 12%ETV ENDOWMENT OF SC INC: $12k → 15%THE BELTON AREA MUSEUM ASSOCI: $10k → 15%USC EDUCATIONAL FDN: $20k → 16%PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%SC HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 12%ETV ENDOWMENT OF SC INC: $12k → 15%THE BELTON AREA MUSEUM ASSOCI: $10k → 15%USC EDUCATIONAL FDN: $19k → 16%PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%SC HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 12%ETV ENDOWMENT OF SC INC: $10k → 15%THE BELTON AREA MUSEUM ASSOCI: $10k → 15%USC EDUCATIONAL FDN: $18k → 16%PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%SC HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 12%ETV ENDOWMENT OF SC INC: $10k → 15%THE BELTON AREA MUSEUM ASSOCI: $8k → 15%USC EDUCATIONAL FDN: $18k → 16%PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%ETV ENDOWMENT OF SC INC: $10k → 15%USC EDUCATIONAL FDN: $17k → 16%ETV ENDOWMENT OF SC INC: $8k → 15%USC EDUCATIONAL FDN: $17k → 16%ETV ENDOWMENT OF SC INC: $7k → 15%USC EDUCATIONAL FDN: $12k → 16%USC EDUCATIONAL FDN: $12k → 16%NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FDN: $35k → 17%USC EDUCATIONAL FDN: $8k → 16%NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FDN: $30k → 17%NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FDN: $30k → 17%NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FDN: $30k → 17%NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FDN: $30k → 17%NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FDN: $30k → 17%NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FDN: $30k → 17%NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FDN: $30k → 17%NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FDN: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$781k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$781k
$0

Still filing today

82%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NO
    NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +44%
  • EE
    ETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $99k · revenue +83%
  • PC
    PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +79%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    South Carolina Artisans Center

    Cultural and educational resource

    —
    2
    The Charleston Museum

    To educate Charleston area residents and visitors about the natural and cultural history of the South Carolina Lowcountry through collections, exhibitions, preservation, conservation, research and related programming.

    Arts & Culture
    3
    South Carolina Arts Alliance

    Advances and promotes the arts for all south carolinians through advocacy, leadership, development and public awareness.

    —
    4
    Upstate Center for the Arts

    To provide exceptional arts education and make art accessable and exciting to our community.

    —
    5
    Greenville Center for Creative Arts

    The greenville center for creative arts exists to enrich the cultural fabric of the communities we serve by providing a nurturing environment for art-education, appreciation and enjoyment, and by establishing a lasting legacy in the visual…

    Arts & Culture
    6
    Morgan County Foundation Inc

    The mission of the madison-morgan cultural center is to enhance education and enjoyment of the arts and humanities by offering high quality permanent exhibits, temporary exhibitions, and performances while preserving our historic buildings.

    Arts & Culture
    7
    Arts Center of Coastal Carolina

    To provide cultural enrichment on hilton head island and enable residents and visitors to have access to cultural activities.

    Arts & Culture
    8
    Carolina Art Association Dba Gibbes Museum of Art

    The mission of the gibbes museum of art is to enhance lives through art by engaging people of every background and experience with art and artists of enduring quality; collect and preserve the art that touches charleston; and provide…

    Arts & Culture
    9
    The Palmetto Opera

    To raise awareness of opera and fine arts in sc.

    Arts & Culture
    10
    Sumter County Fine Arts Council

    Cultural enrichment through arts programs

    Arts & Culture
    11
    North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

    To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

    Arts & Culture
    12
    Barton College

    Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Etv Endowment of South Carolina Inc; the most unlike its peers is Living Water Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    5/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $275,000 · Arts & CultureNEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FOUNDATION INCETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc: $99,000 · Arts & CultureETV Endowment of South Carolina IncPEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Arts & CulturePEACE CENTER FOUNDATIONBELTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $30,500 · Arts & CultureBELTON CENTER FOR THE ARTSUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $141,000 · EducationUniversity of South C…WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationBELTON AREA MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $72,500 · OtherBELTON AREA MUSEUM…SC HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $46,000 · OtherSC HISTORICAL SOCI…PALMETTO TR FOR HISTORICAL PRESERVA: $10,000 · OtherPALMETTO TR FOR HI…ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $37,000 · Human ServicesLIVING WATER FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 · Health
    Arts & Culture$449,500Education$146,000Other$128,500Human Services$37,000Health$19,500

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $275,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $141,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc: $99,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBELTON AREA MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $72,500 over 9y, 11% of budgetPEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $37,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBELTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $30,500 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetLIVING WATER FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 over 9y, 11% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds NEWBERRY OPERA HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds University of South Carolina Educational Foundation ↗
    • Who funds ETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc ↗
    • Who funds BELTON AREA MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
    • Who funds PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗
    • Who funds BELTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
    • Who funds LIVING WATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Duke Energy FoundationNC14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Pope-Brown Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pope-Brown Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2023
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Pope-Brown Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to Pope-Brown Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Pope-Brown’s filings →

      More from the funding graph