Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pond Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222023.

Animals$38kArts & Culture$20kHealth$11kHuman Services$11kPhilanthropy$11kPublic Benefit$11kYouth Development$5kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,400
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Animal Protection of NM$5,400
Tewa Women United$5,400
Assert The Second Responder Inc$5,400
Assistnace Dogs of the West$5,400
Creative Thought and Action$5,400
Fyera Foundation$5,400
Northern Jaguar Project$5,400
Freedom to Choose Project$5,400
Chance of a Lifetime$5,400
Funds For Change$5,400
Feline Friends of New Mexico$5,400
Breath of My Heart Birthplace$5,400
The Path Inc$4,500
Lightning Boy Foundaiton Inc$2,700
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Fyera Foundation: $5k → 13%Tewa Women United: $5k → 18%Tewa Women United: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$68k · 7 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$68k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+31%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
Human ServicesAnimalsPublic BenefitHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NJ
    NORTHERN JAGUAR PROJECT
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue +24%
  • BO
    BREATH OF MY HEART BIRTH PLACE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue +192%
  • AC
    A CHANCE OF A LIFETIME
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • VF
    Veterans For Peace Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +31%
  • FF
    Fund for Change
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising
2
Friends Peace Teams Inc

Friends Peace Teams is a Spirit-led organization working around the world to develop long-term relationships with communities in conflict to create programs for peace building, healing & reconciliation based on extensive Quaker experience.

International
3
Kindred World

Child mental and physical well-being have been on the decline for over 50 years in the USA, the wealthiest nation on earth. Kindred World began as a grassroots, consciousness-raising organization of parents and professionals in 1996,…

Health
4
Womanshare Legacy

Womanshare Legacy is an educational, financial and cultural resource for women who may be facing challenges because of discrimination, lack of opportunities or scarcity of personal support. Womanshare Legacy works locally with women,…

Human Services
5
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
6
Healing Bridges

Healing Bridges works with traditional communities to create audiovisual products about their beliefs, engages in various forms of advocacy and other supporting activities in national and international arenas to protect and strengthen…

International
7
Nia Tero Foundation

Nia tero works alongside indigenous peoples to secure their guardianship of vital ecosystems. indigenous peoples are guardians of earth.(see schedule o)

Environment
8
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
9
Environmentalism Through Inspiration & Nonviolent Action

To produce, promote, and assist charitable activites that encourage world peace, help underprivileged people (especially women and children), promote environmental preservation, advocate cultural preservation through, but not limited to,…

Environment
10
Healing Ribbons

To promote healing, positive cultural identity, holistic wellness and connection among intergenerational indigenous women and our families by sharing our collective wisdom, traditions, wellness practices and stories. we focus on healing by…

Human Services
11
Sanctuary for Peace
Unclassified
12
Boudiccas Peace Foundation

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tewa Women United and the most unlike its peers is A Chance of a Lifetime. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CREATIVE THOUGHT AND ACTION — $10,800 · OtherCREATIVE THOUGHT AND ACTIONFunds For Change — $5,400 · OtherFunds For ChangeAssert The Second Responder Inc — $5,400 · OtherAssert The Second Responder IncFeline Friends of New Mexico — $5,400 · OtherFeline Friends of New MexicoAnimal Protection of NM — $5,400 · OtherAnimal Protection of NMAssistnace Dogs of the West — $5,400 · OtherAssistnace Dogs of the WestTHE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE PROJECT — $5,400 · OtherTHE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE PROJECTFund for Change — $5,400 · OtherFund for ChangeNORTHERN JAGUAR PROJECT — $10,800 · AnimalsNORTHERN JAGUAR PROJ…A CHANCE OF A LIFETIME — $10,800 · AnimalsA CHANCE OF A LIFETI…TEWA WOMEN UNITED — $10,800 · Human ServicesTEWA WOMEN UNIT…The Fyera Foundation — $5,400 · Human ServicesThe Fyera Found…Veterans For Peace Inc — $10,800 · Public BenefitVeterans F…BREATH OF MY HEART BIRTH PLACE — $10,800 · HealthBREATH OF …The Path Inc — $9,000 · Food & NutritionLIGHTNING BOY FOUNDATION INC — $5,400 · Youth Development
Other$48,600Animals$21,600Human Services$16,200Public Benefit$10,800Health$10,800Food & Nutrition$9,000Youth Development$5,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEWA WOMEN UNITED — $10,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN JAGUAR PROJECT — $10,800 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetVeterans For Peace Inc — $10,800 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBREATH OF MY HEART BIRTH PLACE — $10,800 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetA CHANCE OF A LIFETIME — $10,800 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetThe Path Inc — $9,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetLIGHTNING BOY FOUNDATION INC — $5,400 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE PROJECT — $5,400 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Fyera Foundation — $5,400 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetFund for Change — $5,400 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pond Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph