Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pollack Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Religion$59kHealth$4kEducation$4kInternational$4kPublic Benefit$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kHuman Services$472Animals$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$180
Median grant
5
States reached
$176k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG ISRAEL OF FORT LEE$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
YOUNG ISRAEL OF PITTSBURGH$1,000
HILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH$960
MAGEN DAVID ADOM$200
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPI$180
FIDF$180
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID$180
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION$100
Individual grant recipient$100
FORT LEE FIRE PREVENTION ASSOC$100
Individual grant recipient$100
FRIENDS OF THE FORT LEE PUBLIC LIBR$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $472) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MISASKIM CORP: $100 → 20%MISASKIM: $100 → 20%MISASKIM CORP: $100 → 20%MISASKIM: $72 → 20%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44k · 19 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
41

Total granted

$44k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+48%

Still filing today

26%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationReligionPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +117%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +16%
  • HA
    HILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • CP
    CONGREGATION POALE ZEDECK
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FREINDS OF SHALVA
    one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
2
Sherit Isroel
3
Aishel Hatzedek
International
4
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
5
International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc

The international fellowship of christian and jews is the leading non-profit building bridges between christians and jews, blessing israel and the jewish people around the world with, humanitarian care and life-saving aid.

6
American Friends of Jewish Hospitals and Education Centers of Brazil Inc
Philanthropy
7
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
8
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
9
Friends of Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Inc

The friends of the tel aviv sourasky medical center helps to raise support for projects that are chosen based upon the priorities set by the tel aviv sourasky medical center. dedicated to the medical center's development and success,…

Health
10
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…

Education
11
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
12
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Magen David Adom and the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $19,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOUNG ISRAEL OF FORT LEE — $15,305 · OtherYOUNG ISRAEL OF FORT LEEIndividual grant recipient — $7,685 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION POALE ZEDECK — $4,540 · OtherCONGREGATION POALE ZEDECKIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherAMERICAN FREINDS OF SHALVA — $3,400 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA — $3,000 · Other+47 more — $27,602 · Other+47 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,890 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $180 · InternationalJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $2,750 · Public BenefitHILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH — $1,960 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE FORT LEE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $100 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $630 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL INC — $500 · HealthHEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION — $100 · HealthCONGREGATION TIFERES MIRIAM — $1,000 · ReligionMISASKIM CORP — $372 · Human ServicesCharity Navigator — $100 · Human ServicesTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $100 · Animals
Other$85,032International$3,070Public Benefit$2,750Education$2,060Health$1,230Religion$1,000Human Services$472Animals$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,890 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $2,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH — $1,960 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION TIFERES MIRIAM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $630 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP — $372 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBeis Midrash of Queens — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FORT LEE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC
  • Who funds HILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds CONGREGATION TIFERES MIRIAM
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP
  • Who funds Beis Midrash of Queens

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pollack Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pollack Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pollack Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph