Skip to content

· Private foundation

Polish National Alliance School Corp

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$394kHealth$36kScience & Tech$5kRecreation & Sports$4kCrime & Legal$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $41,066, the rows itemized in this filing. The $46,666 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,600 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$600
Median grant
15
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO$5,000
NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY$5,000
LAKE ERIE COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF ST AUGUSTINE$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARY$2,600
NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY$2,500
NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY$2,000
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
BARRY UNIVERSITY$2,000
PACIFIC NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$1,666
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA CHAMPAIGN$600
SCULB$600
ST GEORGE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$600
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHARMACY$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ATSU-Arizona School of Dentistry Or: $3k → 11%Bridgewater State University: $2k → 8%Pepperdine University - Graziadio B: $3k → 11%University of California Irvine: $2k → 10%University of California: $2k → 10%Charles R Drew University of Med: $2k → 14%American University: $2k → 14%Nova Southeastern University: $2k → 14%University of Miami School of Medic: $5k → 15%Univ of Michigan CS Mott Children's: $2k → 14%University of Michigan: $3k → 16%Saint Louis University: $3k → 21%Concordia University Wisconsin: $2k → 6%Marquette University: $5k → 17%University of New Haven: $2k → 12%Lincoln Memorial University College: $2k → 20%Georgia Institute of Technology: $2k → 13%Neomed: $2k → 12%The Ohio State University College o: $2k → 15%University of Toledo: $5k → 18%University of Washington: $3k → 9%Midwestern University: $3k → 7%Olivet Nazarene University: $2k → 14%University of Illinois at Chicago: $3k → 14%University of Illinois- Urbana: $3k → 19%University of North Dakota: $3k → 13%Liberty University: $2k → 20%Dartmouth College: $2k → 10%AT STILL University - ASDOH: $3k → 11%Duquesne University Pharmacy School: $3k → 11%Chapman University: $2k → 10%George Washington University: $2k → 14%University of Michigan Flint: $2k → 16%Concordia Universty Wisconsin: $2k → 6%Marquette University: $5k → 17%Albertus Mangus College: $2k → 12%Lincoln Memorial University College: $2k → 20%Northeast Ohio Medical University: $3k → 13%University of Illinois in Chicago C: $3k → 14%John Hopkins Bloomberg: $5k → 19%Marquette University School of Dent: $2k → 17%The Quinnipiac University: $3k → 12%Pepperdine University - Graziadio: $3k → 14%Northwestern University Feinburg Sc: $3k → 14%University of Illinois of Chicago: $3k → 14%DePaul University: $3k → 14%DePaul University: $3k → 14%DePaul University: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
ND
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 29% of Polish National Alliance School Corp’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Polish National Alliance School Corplessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$231k · 50 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
103

Total granted

$231k
$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+16%

Still filing today

50%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    5× · 2019–2023 · $15k · revenue +46%
  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +25%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc
    5× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • UO
    University of Miami School of Medic
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • UO
    University of Illinois at Chicago
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
6
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
7
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
8
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
9
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
10
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
12
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 172 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/63
Grantees still filing
54/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Northeast Ohio Medical University: $11,840 · OtherUniversity of Kentucky: $11,000 · Other+110 more: $240,566 · Other+110 moreMarquette University: $15,000 · EducationMarquette UniversityDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITYNova Southeastern University Inc: $8,250 · EducationLINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth College: $7,750 · EducationThe George Washington University: $7,000 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $6,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $6,000 · Education+51 more: $108,750 · Education+51 moreNorthwestern University: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$263,406Education$176,750Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $8,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $7,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $6,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMidwestern University: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE ERIE COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $4,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLewis University: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA T Still University of Health Sciences: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Mary: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of New Haven: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBERTUS MAGNUS COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJohn Carroll University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARRY UNIVERSITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Indianapolis: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaldwin Wallace University: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetButler University: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPBELL UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHusson University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Midwestern University ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE ERIE COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds Lewis University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds A T Still University of Health Sciences ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds AURORA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Council of Independent Colleges · Cvs Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Marquette Bank Education Foundation · Wf & Blanche E West Educational & Coffman Jf · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Polish National Alliance School Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Polish National Alliance School Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 4% of income from government
  • Florida Institute of Technology Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 2% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • University of New Haven: 1% of income from government
  • Albertus Magnus College: 1% of income from government
  • University of Saint Joseph: 1% of income from government
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University: 0% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Polish National Alliance School Corp?

Find your warmest path to Polish National Alliance School Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 172 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Polish National Alliance School’s filings →

More from the funding graph