Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pleasant Hill Rotary Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$98kFood & Nutrition$74kInternational$41kHuman Services$30kPhilanthropy$26kHealth$18kRecreation & Sports$14kArts & Culture$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$425k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$2,000
PLEASANT HILL REC AND PARK DIST$1,500
PLEASANT HILL CIVIC ACTION$1,500
PH CHAMBER OF COM - ART WINE$1,000
YOUTH HOMES$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CCCOE TEACHER OF THE YEAR$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Shelter Box Inc: $1k → 14%Shelter Box Inc: $1k → 10%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $12k → 9%YOUTH HOMES: $1k → 9%Monument Crisis Center: $600 → 9%Monument Crisis Center: $500 → 9%White Pony Express: $51k → 9%Youth Homes: $3k → 9%YOUTH HOMES: $3k → 9%YOUTH HOMES: $2k → 9%Youth Homes: $1k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $1k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$246k · 26 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
56

Total granted

$246k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+30%

Still filing today

35%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WHITE PONY EXPRESS
    3× · 2017–2022 · $53k · revenue +161%
  • MC
    MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER
    3× · 2018–2021 · $13k · revenue +60%
  • PH
    PLEASANT HILL FOURTH OF JULY COMMISSION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +178%

Funded once

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • SI
    Scholarships Incorporated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANOgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Palo Alto Food Closet

Provide food to qualifying families in Palo Alto

Food & Nutrition
2
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
3
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
California Cricket Foundation
Recreation & Sports
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Food for Thought of Contra Costa County

Food For Thought of Contra Costa Countys mission is to address the food insecurity faced by students and their families in the West Contra Costa County School District.

Food & Nutrition
7
Yolo Food Bank

The mission of yolo food bank is to make yolo county a thriving community where everyone has the resources they need to experience health, prosperity, and a high quality of life. Yolo Food bank durably increases food and nutrition security…

Food & Nutrition
8
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
9
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
10
Pta California Congress of Parents Teachers & Students Inc Casillas Elementary School

PTA school organization

—
11
Community Food Bank of San Benito County

Our mission is to provide food, nutritional education, and advocacy for those in need within san benito county, while pursuing our ultimate vision that no resident will suffer from hunger or malnutrition in san benito county.

Education
12
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monument Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is College Park Athletic Booster Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROTARY INT'L PLEASANT HILL ROTARY CLUB: $40,942 · OtherROTARY INT'L PLEASANT HILL ROTARY CLUBCollege Park High School's Var Seni: $34,291 · OtherCollege Park High School's Var SeniPLEASANT HILL LIBRARY FUND: $31,000 · OtherPLEASANT HILL LIBRARY FUNDMEALS ON WHEELS: $11,250 · OtherScholarships Incorporated: $9,908 · Other+82 more: $150,605 · Other+82 moreWHITE PONY EXPRESS: $53,130 · Human ServicesWHITE PONY EXPRESSMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $12,850 · Human ServicesMONUMENT CRISIS CENTERYouth Homes Inc: $8,500 · Human ServicesYouth Homes Inc+2 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $6,578 · Food & NutritionCHOICE IN AGING: $3,100 · HealthNEW DAY FOR CHILDREN: $600 · HealthCHRISTMAS FOR EVERYONE INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyCOLLEGE PARK ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: $1,000 · EducationContra Costa Realtors In Motion: $500 · Community Improvement
Other$277,996Human Services$76,980Food & Nutrition$6,578Health$3,700Philanthropy$2,500Education$1,000Community Improvement$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHITE PONY EXPRESS: $53,130 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetROTARY INT'L PLEASANT HILL ROTARY CLUB: $40,942 over 3y, 34% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $12,850 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYouth Homes Inc: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $6,578 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLEASANT HILL FOURTH OF JULY COMMISSION: $5,500 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetCHOICE IN AGING: $3,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTMAS FOR EVERYONE INC: $2,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARTINEZ ROTARY CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOLLEGE PARK ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW DAY FOR CHILDREN: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTOVETEAM INTERNATIONAL: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetContra Costa Realtors In Motion: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHITE PONY EXPRESS ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INT'L PLEASANT HILL ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Scholarships Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Youth Homes Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO ↗
  • Who funds PLEASANT HILL FOURTH OF JULY COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds CHOICE IN AGING ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS FOR EVERYONE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community FoundationCA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pleasant Hill Rotary Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pleasant Hill Rotary Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pleasant Hill Rotary Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pleasant Hill Rotary Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pleasant Hill Rotary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph