Skip to content

· Private foundation

Planning and Art Resources for Communities Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2020
15
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$400k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of Planning and Art Resources for Communities Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Venn Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Planning and Art Resources for Communities Inc named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $2M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’20
9
’21
7
’22
7
’23
8
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$9.6MInternational$1.4MEnvironment$1.3MCivil Rights$893kCrime & Legal$700kAnimals$680kHealth$625kYouth Development$500kOther$0
02FY2020 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$120,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Saddleback Mountain Foundation$400,000
Doctors Without Borders$200,000
Doctors Without Borders$200,000
Wildlife Conservation Network$185,000
Innocence Project$125,000
Innocence Project$125,000
CARINGKIND$125,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$120,000
The Hetrick-Martin Institute$100,000
FAIR Girls Inc$75,000
Columbia Greene Humane Society$75,000
OutRight Action International$70,000
Hot Bread Kitchen Ltd$60,000
Restaurant Workers Community Foundation Inc$60,000
Time and Space Limited$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Hot Bread Kitchen Ltd: $60k → 20%THE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $100k → 17%THE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $100k → 17%THE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $100k → 17%THE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $100k → 17%The Hetrick-Martin Institute: $100k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $200k → 17%Innocence Project: $125k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $125k → 17%Innocence Project: $125k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $125k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 58% of Planning and Art Resources for Communities Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Planning and Art Resources for Communities Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.8M · 14 repeat orgs$615k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$6.8M
$615k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+16%

Still filing today

79%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +39%
  • RL
    RANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +16%
  • TI
    THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $700k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • SM
    Saddleback Mountain Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $400k · revenue -100%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $120k · revenue +21%
  • HB
    HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
6
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
7
Conservation X Labs Inc

To improve the efficacy, speed, cost, sustainability, and scaling of conservation solutions through harnessing exponential technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship to prevent human-induced extinction.

Animals
8
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
9
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
10
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
11
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
12
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Carriage Trade Gallery Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VENN FOUNDATION: $9,550,000 · PhilanthropyVENN FOUNDATIONMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,300,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…FAIR GIRLS INC: $150,000 · InternationalFAIR GIRLS…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $120,000 · InternationalWORLD CENT…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $613,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE…THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $325,000 · OtherTHE TRUST FOR …OUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL: $280,000 · OtherOUTRIGHT INTER…DISCALCED INC: $400,000 · OtherDISCALCED INCSaddleback Mountain Foundation: $400,000 · OtherSaddleback Mou…+3 more: $145,000 · Other+3 moreTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $700,000 · Human ServicesTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $500,000 · Human ServicesHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $60,000 · Human ServicesRANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST INC: $1,000,000 · EnvironmentDESIGN TRUST FOR PUBLIC SPACE INC: $150,000 · EnvironmentCOLUMBIA-GREENE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $375,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $305,000 · AnimalsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $625,000 · Health
Philanthropy$9,550,000International$1,570,000Other$2,163,000Human Services$1,260,000Environment$1,150,000Animals$680,000Health$625,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVENN FOUNDATION: $9,550,000 over 4y, 44% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,300,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST INC: $1,000,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $700,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $625,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $500,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetDISCALCED INC: $400,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetSaddleback Mountain Foundation: $400,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCOLUMBIA-GREENE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $375,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $305,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL: $280,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetDESIGN TRUST FOR PUBLIC SPACE INC: $150,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetFAIR GIRLS INC: $150,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $120,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $60,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRESTAURANT WORKERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCARRIAGE TRADE GALLERY CORP: $35,000 over 1y, 22% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Planning and Art Resources for Communities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Planning and Art Resources for Communities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Planning and Art Resources for Communities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Planning and Art Resources for Communities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Planning and Art Resources for Communities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph