Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

PJ and Mary Ann Desai Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$132k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$387kHealth$69kPhilanthropy$33kArts & Culture$30kFood & Nutrition$4kInternational$3kRecreation & Sports$3kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$556k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$100,000
JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL$10,500
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$4,500
ROSSMAN SCHOOL$3,500
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS$2,500
BAY HARBOR FOUNDATION$2,500
GREAT LAKES CENTER FOR THE ARTS$2,500
MIT$2,500
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$1,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC$500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI$500
NINE PBS$500
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
MO
TN
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$516k · 20 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$516k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+33%

Still filing today

75%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JB
    JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +62%
  • RS
    ROSSMAN SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +32%
  • MI
    Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School
    6× · 2017–2023 · $58k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +33%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +113%
  • FA
    FRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +74%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
4
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
11
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Magic House and the most unlike its peers is Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Community FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and AdoptionGovernment Accountability R…Veteran Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringUnited Way FederationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsSouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Independent K-8 SchoolsCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr12%0%5–10yr16%4%10–20yr15%36%20–35yr16%8%35–55yr24%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr16%2%10–20yr15%13%20–35yr16%4%35–55yr24%80%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
12%
4,544/39,465

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $107,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL — $97,500 · EducationJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOLMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School — $58,000 · EducationMary Institute and St Louis Country Day SchoolFORSYTH SCHOOL INC — $19,000 · EducationFORSYTH SCHOOL INC+3 more — $2,500 · EducationROSSMAN SCHOOL — $65,000 · OtherROSSMAN SCHOOLMIT — $21,500 · OtherMITUniversity of Michigan — $16,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN — $8,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $7,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANSAINT LOUIS FOOD BANK — $4,250 · Other+7 more — $4,200 · OtherMISSOURI BAPTIST HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $45,000 · HealthMISSOURI BA…American Heart Association Inc — $5,000 · HealthAmerican He…+4 more — $3,100 · Health+4 moreUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $31,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…BAY HARBOR FOUNDATION — $12,500 · PhilanthropyBAY HARBO…+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyGreat Lakes Center for the Arts — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MAGIC HOUSE — $5,000 · Arts & CultureST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $750 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNorthwestern University — $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$284,500Other$126,450Health$53,100Philanthropy$45,000Arts & Culture$15,750Public Safety & Disaster$3,000Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $107,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL — $97,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetROSSMAN SCHOOL — $65,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School — $58,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI BAPTIST HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $31,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFORSYTH SCHOOL INC — $19,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $16,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBAY HARBOR FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetGreat Lakes Center for the Arts — $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAGIC HOUSE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROOM TO READ — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHESTERFIELD DAY SCHOOL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Moneta Group Charitable FoundationMO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Edward Jones Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization PJ and Mary Ann Desai Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph