Skip to content

· Public charity

Pioneer Works Art Foundation

To promote the creation of and participation in the arts and sciences.

$907k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$94k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$465kYouth Development$235kHuman Services$119kCrime & Legal$115kCommunity Improvement$29kOther$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $648,750, the rows itemized in this filing. The $906,649 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $257,899 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $49k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $593k
$86,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RED HOOK INITIATIVE$93,750
HOOK ARTS MEDIA INC$86,250
HEARTSHARE ST VINCENT'S SERVICES$86,250
PORTSIDE NEWYORK INC$86,250
CORA INCORPORATED$86,250
JUSTICE INNOVATION INC$86,250
THE ALEX HOUSE PROJECT INC$67,500
RED HOOK ART PROJECT INC$48,750
RED HOOK RISE$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $330k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $94k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $31k → 20%THE ALEX HOUSE PROJECT INC: $23k → 20%HEARTSHARE ST VINCENT'S SERVICES: $86k → 20%THE ALEX HOUSE PROJECT INC: $68k → 20%HEARTSHARE ST VINCENT'S SERVICES: $29k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$855k · 8 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$855k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+53%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23
Human ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JI
    JUSTICE INNOVATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $115k · revenue +232%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $115k · revenue +19%
  • AH
    Alex House Project Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $90k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • PH
    PRESERVATION HALL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +53%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harlem Film House

Harlem Film House provides access and opportunity for creative entrepreneurs and independent storytellers by producing programs platforms and events that support artistic development audience engagement and career growth Through film media…

Arts & Culture
2
Art Start Inc

Art start uses the creative process to nurture the voices, hearts and minds - see schedule o

Arts & Culture
3
Juxtaposition Arts Inc

Juxtaposition arts (jxta) is a visual art and design organization, rooted in north minneapolis for over 30 years. we expand access to creative education and career pathways by engaging emerging artisits in rigorous traning, mentorship and…

Youth Development
4
Harlem Arts Foundation

The Harlem Art''s Foundation''s Mission Is To Showcase And Preserve Harlem''s Tradition Of Rich Culture And Community By Working With Our Local Partners To Strategically Shape The Physical And Social Opportunities Of Our Neighborhood…

—
5
Studio in a School Association Inc

From classrooms to careers, studio in a school expands access to visual arts education and professions in the arts by partnering with practicing artists, schools, and cultural institutions.

—
6
David's Harp Foundation

To inspire, educate, and empower "opportunity youth", to achieve academic success through music education, sound engineering, and multimedia production.

Youth Development
7
Art League of Houston

The mission of art league houston is to connect the community through diverse, dynamic, and creative experiences that bring people together to see, make, and talk about contemporary visual art.

—
8
Cultural Agents Inc

To promote divergent thinking of arts and humanities in the service of solutions to real life problems. in courses, conferences and community- based projects, we join a range of creative collaborators to feature art and interpretation as…

Arts & Culture
9
The Institute of Music for Children Inc

To engage children and youth in artistic expression and the creative process.

Arts & Culture
10
Leap Inc

Leap empowers low and moderate income people by helping them gain access to living-wage employment opportunities and career paths. we seek to develop programs that counter prevailing market inequalities and contribute to a broader movement…

Housing & Shelter
11
Hope Community Inc

Hope community creates connections that strengthen the power of community members and communities. hope cultivates community leaders, builds community capacity, cares for the housing and community spaces it develops, and pursues equity and…

Housing & Shelter
12
Argus Community Inc

Argus community's mission is to provide innovative programs which help severely disadvantaged teens and adults to free themselves from poverty and drug abuse and build new lives based on responsibility, work, and hope. argus provides a…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Red Hook Initiative; the most unlike its peers is Alex House Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $125,000 · Human ServicesRED HOOK INITIATIVEST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC: $115,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT'S SERVICES INCAlex House Project Inc: $90,000 · Human ServicesAlex House Project IncPORTSIDE NEW YORK INC: $115,000 · Arts & CulturePORTSIDE NEW YORK INCPRESERVATION HALL FOUNDATION INC: $100,050 · Arts & CulturePRESERVATION HALL FOUNDATION INCRED HOOK ART PROJECT INC: $65,000 · Arts & CultureRED HOOK ART PROJECT INCHOOK ARTS MEDIA INC: $115,000 · OtherHOOK ARTS MEDIA…Individual grant recipient: $10,750 · OtherIndividual gran…RED HOOK RISE INC: $7,500 · OtherRED HOOK RISE I…JUSTICE INNOVATION INC: $115,000 · Crime & LegalJUSTICE INNOV…CORA INCORPORATED: $115,000 · EducationCORA INCORPOR…
Human Services$330,000Arts & Culture$280,050Other$133,250Crime & Legal$115,000Education$115,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRED HOOK INITIATIVE: $125,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetJUSTICE INNOVATION INC: $115,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPORTSIDE NEW YORK INC: $115,000 over 2y, 67% of budgetST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC: $115,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCORA INCORPORATED: $115,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetHOOK ARTS MEDIA INC: $115,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetPRESERVATION HALL FOUNDATION INC: $100,050 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetAlex House Project Inc: $90,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetRED HOOK ART PROJECT INC: $65,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pioneer Works Art Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pioneer Works Art Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $286k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pioneer Works Art’s filings →

    More from the funding graph