Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pinecone Foundation Corp

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$7.1MArts & Culture$3.2MCivil Rights$1.6MFood & Nutrition$1.4MPhilanthropy$359kPublic Safety & Disaster$350kHuman Services$250kReligion$150kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
$150,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Brothers for Life$2,000,000
One Family Fund$200,000
Brothers for Life$200,000
American Friends of Leket Israel$200,000
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc$200,000
ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC$150,000
American Friends of Bat Melech$100,000
Yad Ezra V'Shulamit$100,000
Central Fund of Israel$100,000
Friends of United Hatzalah$100,000
American Friends of Maagalim Inc$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%IsraAID (US) Global Humanitarian Assistance Inc: $200k → 14%Central Fund of Israel: $200k → 6%Friends of United Hatzalah: $150k → 17%Partners Reaching Out to Ulpanat Dolev-PROUD: $75k → 28%Brothers for Life: $2.0M → 9%American Friends of United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto Inc: $1.4M → 4%American Friends of Leket Israel: $200k → 7%American Friends of Bat Melech: $100k → 11%ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $150k → 14%Central Fund of Israel: $175k → 6%Friends of United Hatzalah: $100k → 17%Brothers for Life: $200k → 9%American Friends of UJA: $1.4M → 4%One Family Fund: $200k → 7%American Friends of Bat Melech Inc: $75k → 11%Yad Ezra Vshulamit: $200k → 14%Central Fund of Israel: $100k → 6%Friends of United Hatzalah: $100k → 17%Brothers for Life: $200k → 9%One Family Fund: $200k → 7%American Friends of Bat Melech Inc: $75k → 11%Yad Ezra V'Shulamit: $100k → 14%Central Fund of Israel: $100k → 6%Brothers for Life: $200k → 9%American Friends of Leket Israel: $200k → 7%Yad Ezra Vshulamit: $100k → 14%Cooley's Anemia Foundation Inc: $102k → 17%Brothers for Life: $150k → 9%American Friends of Leket Israel: $200k → 7%Shoah Foundation: $276k → 14%America Gives Inc: $100k → 17%American Friends of Leket Israel: $200k → 7%Yad Ezra Vshulamit: $75k → 14%American Friends of Maagalim Inc: $75k → 6%America Gives Inc: $75k → 17%One Family Fund: $150k → 7%One Family Fund: $125k → 7%American Jewish Joint Committee: $1.3M → 17%American Friends Of Leket Israel Inc: $100k → 7%American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee: $500k → 17%The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $200k → 17%American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee: $200k → 17%American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee: $200k → 17%American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee: $200k → 17%American Jewish Joint Committtee: $150k → 17%American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee: $100k → 17%PEF Israel Endowment Funds: $93k → 17%American Friends of UJA: $1.1M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 14 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$11M
$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
+378%

Still filing today

86%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalPhilanthropyArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    Brothers for Life
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +212%
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +4%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $900k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1.4M · revenue +378% · 100% of their budget
  • AJ
    American Jewish Joint Committee
    one grant, 2017 · $1.3M
  • SF
    Shoah Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $276k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Israel Emergency Aid Fund

To provide funding for medical and humanitarian projects throughout israel. the organization might make grants to other organizations providing such services, including, but not limited to, evp israel and israel emergency aid fund, israeli…

Public Safety & Disaster
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Yad Eliezer-Bei Shemesh

Relief of poverty by means of grants to social service agencies and to individual families in israel.

Philanthropy
7
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
8
American Friends of Torat Eliyahu
Philanthropy
9
For Zions Sake

Global disaster relief, humanitarian aid and comfort for israel and the nations.

International
10
American Friends of Israel Organizations Inc

Funding of organizations qualified under section 501(c) or equivalent as operating for charitable, religious, or educational purposes, or that would so qualify based on the nature of such organization's operations

International
11
Israel Charitable Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Ohel Bas Zion Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Leket Israel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cooley's Anemia Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO INC: $1,421,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED JEWISH APPEAL…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $1,400,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution C…Central Fund of Israel: $719,985 · InternationalCentral Fund of IsraelONE FAMILY FUND: $675,000 · InternationalONE FAMILY FUNDYAD EZRA V'SHULAMIT: $475,000 · InternationalYAD EZRA V'SHULAMITAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAAGALIM INC: $250,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAT MELECH INC: $250,000 · InternationalAmerican Friends of UJA: $2,450,000 · OtherAmerican Friends of UJAAmerican Jewish Joint Committee: $1,300,000 · OtherAmerican Jewish Joint CommitteeShoah Foundation: $275,960 · OtherShoah Foundation+6 more: $510,500 · Other+6 moreBrothers for Life: $2,750,000 · Arts & CultureBrothers for LifeFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $350,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZAL…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $900,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FR…AMERICA GIVES INC: $225,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA GIV…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $199,430 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INC: $125,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FR…ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $350,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
International$5,191,485Other$4,536,460Arts & Culture$3,100,000Philanthropy$1,449,430Public Safety & Disaster$350,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBrothers for Life: $2,750,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO INC: $1,421,500 over 1y, 100% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $1,400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $900,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $719,985 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetONE FAMILY FUND: $675,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetYAD EZRA V'SHULAMIT: $475,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $350,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $350,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAAGALIM INC: $250,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAT MELECH INC: $250,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $225,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $199,430 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INC: $125,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCOOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION: $102,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Brothers for Life ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds ONE FAMILY FUND ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA V'SHULAMIT ↗
  • Who funds ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAAGALIM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAT MELECH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INC ↗
  • Who funds COOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pinecone Foundation Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pinecone Foundation Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pinecone’s filings →

    More from the funding graph