Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pine Tree Conservation Society

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$352kAnimals$309kPhilanthropy$275kScience & Tech$16kHealth$2kFood & Nutrition$1k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$36,000
BIGELOW LABORATORY FOR OCEAN SCIEN$11,250
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$4,200
VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
APPLACHIAN AUDUBON SOCIETY$1,000
MAINE AUDUBON SOCIETY$500
NYC AUDUBON SOCIETY$500
BEDFORD AUDOBON SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE PEREGRINE FUND INC: $10k → 8%LOWER SUSQUEHANNA RIVERKEEPER: $500 → 9%LANCASTER CONSERVATORY: $55k → 9%TEDDY ROOSEVELT SANCTUARY: $1k → 6%BEDFORD AUDOBON SOCIETY: $1k → 9%ENVIORMENTAL ADVOCATES OF NEW YORK: $5k → 14%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $332k → 17%NCHA: $2k → 11%VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 23%ISLAND PRESS-CENTER FOR RESOURCE: $1k → 14%MAINE AUDUBON SOCIETY: $500 → 7%BIGELOW LABORATORY FOR OCEAN SCIEN: $11k → 9%HORN FARM CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL: $1k → 9%ALLIANCE FOR CHESAPEAKE BAY: $500 → 9%BEDFORD AUDOBON SOCIETY: $500 → 9%ENVIORMENTAL ADVOCATES OF NEW YORK: $3k → 14%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $250k → 17%BIGELOW LABORATORY FOR OCEAN SCIENC: $5k → 9%LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVATORY: $123k → 9%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $33k → 17%LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVATORY: $36k → 9%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $4k → 17%LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVATORY: $20k → 9%NEW YORK CITY AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $10k → 17%LANCASTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $5k → 17%LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVATORY: $15k → 9%NYC AUDOBON SOCIETY: $2k → 17%NYC AUDUBON SOCIETY: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$822k · 4 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +63% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$822k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+63%

Still filing today

50%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY
    4× · 2018–2025 · $619k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2022–2025 · $194k
  • EA
    ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $55k
  • LC
    LANCASTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • NY
    NEW YORK CITY BIRD ALLIANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
2
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc

To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.

Environment
3
New Jersey Audubon Society

The new jersey audubon society is a privately supported, not-for-profit, statewide membership organization. (see schedule o for details).

Environment
4
Buffalo Audubon Society Inc

Buffalo audubon society leads and inspires western new yorkers to connect with and protect the natural world through bird-focused activities, advocacy and habitat restoration.

Environment
5
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
6
Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association

Hawk mountain sanctuary association's mission is to conserve birds of prey worldwide by providing leadership in raptor conservation science and education, and by maintaining hawk mountain sanctuary as a model observation, research, and…

Animals
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
Michigan Audubon Society

To foster and promote appreciation and understanding of the natural world by educational, scientific, investigative, literary, philanthropic and charitable pursuits. michigan audubon connects birds and people for the benefit of both…

Environment
9
Environment Now
—
10
Pacific Bird Conservation

To ensure the continued existence of pacific island birds that are under threat from introduced species and habitat loss.

Animals
11
Montana Audubon

Wildlife and natural ecosystems to safeguard biological diversity for current and future generations.

Environment
12
Bird Endowment

Bird Endowment's mission is to save the critically endangered Blue-throated Macaw from extinction in its native range in Bolivia. Habitat destruction has contributed to a steep decline in the wild population of Blue-throated Macaws. In…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bedford Audubon Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Island Press. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $618,950 · OtherNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $193,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+12 more: $58,750 · Other+12 moreNEW YORK CITY BIRD ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC: $7,500 · EnvironmentBEDFORD AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentAppalachian Audubon Society: $1,000 · EnvironmentISLAND PRESS: $1,000 · Environment+1 more: $500 · EnvironmentBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences: $5,000 · Science & TechVALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $2,500 · Animals
Other$926,400Environment$21,500Science & Tech$5,000Animals$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW YORK CITY BIRD ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE PEREGRINE FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEDFORD AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAppalachian Audubon Society: $1,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetISLAND PRESS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Audubon Society: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY BIRD ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PEREGRINE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC ↗
  • Who funds Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BEDFORD AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Audubon Society ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND PRESS ↗
  • Who funds Maine Audubon Society ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dobson Foundation IncPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dobson Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pine Tree Conservation Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pine Tree Conservation Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pine Tree Conservation Society?

    Find your warmest path to Pine Tree Conservation Society through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pine Tree Conservation Society’s filings →

    More from the funding graph