· Private foundation
Pincus & Regina Peterseil Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TALMUDIC UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| SIACH YITZCHOK | $5,000 |
| YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF TORONTO | $5,000 |
| AMIT | $5,000 |
| MESIVTA OF LONG BEACH | $3,800 |
| TORAH ACADEMY OF BOCA | $3,800 |
| YESODEI HATORAH | $3,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,600 |
| FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES | $1,800 |
| HASC | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID | $1,000 |
| KULANU | $500 |
| JUST ONE LIFE | $360 |
| ONE ISRAEL FUND | $300 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $180) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.
15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- YEYESHIVA ELEMENTARY INC3× · 2020–2022 · $12k · revenue +57%
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES3× · 2021–2023 · $3k · revenue +113%- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM3× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +198%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $8k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $8k
- BMBRAUSER MAIMONEDES ACADEMYone grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
Furtherance of jewish education
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.
An institution for higher learning and study of talmudic law for post high school students, and students returning from their studies in israel, where they can further their education.
To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.
A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.
To further jewish education in israel
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.
How this is measured
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC ↗
- Who funds YESODEI HATORAH INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA ELEMENTARY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS TORAS MOSHE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds KULANU INC ↗
- Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
- Who funds JUST ONE LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD ↗
- Who funds ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · The Margules Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Pincus & Regina Peterseil Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pincus & Regina Peterseil Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Yeshiva Elementary Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pincus & Regina Peterseil Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Pincus & Regina Peterseil Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Pincus & Regina Peterseil’s filings →