Skip to content

· Public charity

Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens

To provide services for seniors with disabilities and caregivers, either directly or through a network of provider agencies.

$2.8M
Granted FY2023
16
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$658k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Human Services$3.1MEnvironment$2.4MHealth$533kHousing & Shelter$117kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2023 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $2,029,038, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,836,046 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $807,008 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+1 grant · $658k
$120,468
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACCENTCARE AT HOME$658,092
PAYSON MULTI-PURPOSE SENIOR C$198,655
CITY OF CASA GRANDE$181,262
TOWN OF HAYDEN$164,013
CIRCLE OF LIFE HOME HEALTH$143,876
MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC$125,072
CITY OF GLOBE$122,535
TOWN OF MIAMI$120,468
TOWN OF SUPERIOR$80,905
OAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE$63,705
ARIES$61,139
CAHRA$37,407
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES$27,571
GILA COUNTY CAP$20,226
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $963k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $125k → 11%PAYSON MULTI-PURPOSE SENIOR CENTER: $229k → 19%MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $73k → 11%PAYSON MULTI-PURPOSE SENIOR C: $199k → 19%OAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE: $64k → 11%PAYSON MULTI-PURPOSE SENIOR CENTER: $175k → 19%MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $55k → 11%OAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE: $33k → 11%OAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE: $6k → 11%ABILITY 360: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.1M · 15 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$6.1M
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+16%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ACCENTCARE AT HOME
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.8M
  • PS
    PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $602k · revenue -8%
  • CO
    CITY OF CASA GRANDE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $499k

Funded once

  • HS
    HOME SWEET HOMECARE AGENCY
    one grant, 2022 · $58k
  • AI
    ABILITY360 INC
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACCENTCARE AT HOME: $1,750,247 · OtherACCENTCARE AT HOMECITY OF CASA GRANDE: $498,618 · OtherCITY OF CASA GRANDETOWN OF HAYDEN: $468,468 · OtherTOWN OF HAYDENCatholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc: $438,284 · OtherCatholic Community Services of Southern Arizona IncCITY OF APACHE JUNCTION: $431,304 · OtherCITY OF APACHE JUNCTIONCITY OF GLOBE: $394,648 · OtherCITY OF GLOBETOWN OF MIAMI: $352,172 · OtherTOWN OF MIAMICIRCLE OF LIFE HOME HEALTH: $273,464 · OtherTOWN OF SUPERIOR: $270,737 · Other+4 more: $281,959 · Other+4 morePAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $602,409 · Human ServicesPAYSON SENIOR CEN…MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $253,122 · Human ServicesMARC COMMUNITY RE…OAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC: $101,880 · Human ServicesOAKWOOD CREATIVE …+1 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY: $76,421 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,159,901Human Services$963,411Housing & Shelter$76,421

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $602,409 over 3y, 19% of budgetCatholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc: $438,284 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $253,122 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC: $101,880 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY: $76,421 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetABILITY360 INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds OAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds ABILITY360 INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Area Agency on Aging Region One Inc · 100 Club of Arizona · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens?

    Find your warmest path to Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $348k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens’ filings →

    More from the funding graph