Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Pierce County Accountable Community of Health

To advance the health of our population by eliminating health disparities including promoting equitable access to high quality and cost effective health and human services and resources, to prevent disease and improve health, to improve the efficiency of health care delivery, to empower individuals and communities through engagement,…

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of PIERCE COUNTY ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$56M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES$8,000
PIERCE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $64k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $9k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $8k → 9%GLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES: $10k → 9%SOUTH SOUND OUTREACH SERVICES: $9k → 9%PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES: $154k → 9%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWEST: $4k → 9%KOREAN WOMENS ASSOCIATION: $182k → 9%HOPESPARKS: $646k → 9%STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $19k → 9%PIERCE COUNTY ALLIANCE: $75k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pierce County Accountable Community of Health

To advance the health of our population by eliminating health disparities including promoting equitable access to high quality and cost effective health and human services and resources, to prevent disease and improve health, to improve…

Health
2
Peninsula Community Health Services of Alaska

Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.

Health
3
Peninsula Community Health Services

Pchs exemplifies a culture of community service.

Health
4
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
5
South Peninsula Behavioral Health Services Inc

The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…

Health
6
Family Promise of Pierce County

To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.

Housing & Shelter
7
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
8
Columbia Wellness

CARE. Commitment to improving quality of life. Advocacy for mental health and overall well-being. Response to community needs. Effective treatment with measurable outcomes.

9
Columbia River Mental Health Services

Columbia river mental health services is a full service mental health agency offering a wide spectrum of behavioral health services to children and adults of clark county, washington.

Health
10
Healthpoint

Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.

Health
11
Peninsula Behavioral Health

Peninsula behavioral health is clallam county's primary resource for behavioral health and co-occurring substance use disorder counseling. pbh believes that everyone, deserves access to quality behavioral healthcare. pbh is proud to make…

Health
12
Pier 360

To use peer support specialists, people with lived experience in recovery, to share hope and empower people.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Care and the most unlike its peers is Consejo Counseling & Referral Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnion Benefit TrustsRegional Conservation & Adv…Immigrant & Refugee ServicesHealthcare & Life Science O…Faith-Based International D…Children & Family Grantmaki…Legal Advocacy & ServicesFaith-Based Health SystemsCollege Access and Career P…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%6%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr19%33%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr12%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr19%8%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr12%51%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/59
the rest of the field
14%
2,245/16,504

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
30/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $8,248,683 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONPIERCE COUNTY COMMUNITY RESILIENCY FUND — $3,120,270 · OtherPIERCE COUNTY COMMUNITY RESILIENCY FUNDPIERCE COUNTY — $1,719,209 · OtherPIERCE COUNTY+21 more — $932,550 · Other+21 moreCOMMONSPIRIT WASHINGTON F/K/A FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM — $694,000 · HealthCOMMONSPIRIT WASH…SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $549,124 · HealthSEA MAR COMMUNITY…MULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEM — $459,000 · HealthMULTICARE HEALTH …COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE — $285,385 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH …COMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY — $209,000 · HealthCOMPREHENSIVE MEN…OLALLA RECOVERY CENTERS — $144,000 · HealthConsejo Counseling & Referral Service — $139,000 · HealthASIAN AMERICAN CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY TREATMENT SERVICE — $130,000 · Health+6 more — $218,350 · Health+6 moreHopeSparks — $646,377 · Human ServicesKOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION — $182,067 · Human ServicesPIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC — $154,000 · Human ServicesPierce County Alliance — $75,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $64,000 · Human Services+5 more — $59,300 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $154,000 · Community ImprovementPIERCE COUNTY CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUT — $20,400 · Crime & LegalSAFE STREETS CAMPAIGN — $15,000 · Crime & LegalFIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS — $19,000 · Youth DevelopmentEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $19,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$14,020,712Health$2,827,859Human Services$1,180,744Community Improvement$154,000Crime & Legal$35,400Youth Development$19,000Food & Nutrition$19,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPIERCE COUNTY COMMUNITY RESILIENCY FUND — $3,120,270 over 3y, 100% of budgetCOMMONSPIRIT WASHINGTON F/K/A FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM — $694,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHopeSparks — $646,377 over 1y, 12% of budgetSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $549,124 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEM — $459,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE — $285,385 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY — $209,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetKOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION — $182,067 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMETROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $154,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC — $154,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOLALLA RECOVERY CENTERS — $144,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetConsejo Counseling & Referral Service — $139,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY TREATMENT SERVICE — $130,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetPierce County Alliance — $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER LAKES MENTAL HEALTHCARE — $69,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $64,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY — $49,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON — $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIERCE COUNTY CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUT — $20,400 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSTEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $19,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS — $19,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $19,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES — $17,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAFE STREETS CAMPAIGN — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTH SOUND OUTREACH SERVICES — $9,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPierce County Aids Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHERINE PLACE — $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCENTERFORCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLutheran Community Services Northwest — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Tacoma Community FoundationWA49.2× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Woodworth Family Foundation · Multicare Health System · The Norcliffe Foundation · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine · The Bamford Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · Medina Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Russell Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pierce County Accountable Community of Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph