· Public charity
Pierce County Accountable Community of Health
To advance the health of our population by eliminating health disparities including promoting equitable access to high quality and cost effective health and human services and resources, to prevent disease and improve health, to improve the efficiency of health care delivery, to empower individuals and communities through engagement,…
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of PIERCE COUNTY ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES | $8,000 |
| PIERCE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advance the health of our population by eliminating health disparities including promoting equitable access to high quality and cost effective health and human services and resources, to prevent disease and improve health, to improve…
Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.
Pchs exemplifies a culture of community service.
Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved
The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…
To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.
To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.
CARE. Commitment to improving quality of life. Advocacy for mental health and overall well-being. Response to community needs. Effective treatment with measurable outcomes.
Columbia river mental health services is a full service mental health agency offering a wide spectrum of behavioral health services to children and adults of clark county, washington.
Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.
Peninsula behavioral health is clallam county's primary resource for behavioral health and co-occurring substance use disorder counseling. pbh believes that everyone, deserves access to quality behavioral healthcare. pbh is proud to make…
To use peer support specialists, people with lived experience in recovery, to share hope and empower people.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Care and the most unlike its peers is Consejo Counseling & Referral Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PIERCE COUNTY COMMUNITY RESILIENCY FUND ↗
- Who funds COMMONSPIRIT WASHINGTON F/K/A FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds HopeSparks ↗
- Who funds SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds MULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds KOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds OLALLA RECOVERY CENTERS ↗
- Who funds Consejo Counseling & Referral Service ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY TREATMENT SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Pierce County Alliance ↗
- Who funds GREATER LAKES MENTAL HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY ↗
- Who funds DAVE PURCHASE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds PIERCE COUNTY CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUT ↗
- Who funds STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds FIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Woodworth Family Foundation · Multicare Health System · The Norcliffe Foundation · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine · The Bamford Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · Medina Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Russell Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pierce County Accountable Community of Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.