Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Answer Health Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$32kFood & Nutrition$30kHealth$16kInternational$11kEmployment$6kOther$22k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$212k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OASIS OF HOPE CENTER$4,000
KIDS FOOD BASKET$4,000
OUR KITCHEN TABLE$4,000
EXALTA HEALTH$4,000
AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC$2,000
MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES$2,000
WOMEN AT RISK INTERNATIONAL INC$2,000
WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES$2,000
BRODYS BE CAFE LLC$2,000
GUIDING LIGHT$2,000
BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $2k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $2k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $2k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $2k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $2k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $1k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $2k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $2k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $2k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $2k → 11%OASIS OF HOPE CENTER: $4k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $2k → 11%OASIS OF HOPE CENTER: $4k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $1k → 11%OASIS OF HOPE CENTER: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$114k · 10 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$114k
$900

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+93%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthInternationalEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KF
    KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +12%
  • HI
    HEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +25%
  • AA
    AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • NK
    National Kidney Foundation of Michigan Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $900 · revenue +93%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

2
Hope Medical Clinic Inc

Hope is a not-for-profit interdenominational christian medical, dental, and social service organization. hope's goal is to provide compassionate and practical help, ministering to the whole person with dignity and respect. this includes…

3
Movement West Michigan

Uniting christian faith leaders to serve with humility and love for the flourishing of all in our community.

Religion
4
West Michigan Christian Foundation

None

Religion
5
Agewell Services of West Michigan

Agewell services mission is to promote healthy aging and maximize independence through nutrition, wellness, and supportive services in the community.

Food & Nutrition
6
Family Outreach Center

Leading the way in promoting healthy family living by reaching out to underserved populations and those who are in our community.

7
Kalamazoo Area Christian Retir Asso

To operate and manage according to law and applicable regulations, a certified home for the ages for qualified residents of Kalamazoo county and its surrounding counties.

Human Services
8
Goodwill Industries of Northern Michigan Inc

We bring food to neighbors, help vulnerable people find home, and provide empowering employment through our community-supported social enterprise and collaborative partnerships.the 2023 990 was for 10/1-12/31/23 due to an accounting period…

Employment
9
African Resource Center of West Michigan

The African Resource Center informs connects and equips African immigrants in West Michigan with people and resources to foster a flourishing community in which recent African immigrants can prosper emotionally economically and socially.

Human Services
10
Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
Health
11
Jehovah Jireh Ministries of West Mi

Distribution of food to the needy

Religion
12
But God Ministries

Sharing the love of jesus christ by building sustainable communities around the world and providing medical care to low-income households in the united states. the organization is currently building two sustainable communities in haiti and…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Intervention Services and the most unlike its peers is National Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC — $10,750 · Human ServicesAREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTER…WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES — $10,750 · Human ServicesWEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICESOASIS OF HOPE CENTER — $10,000 · Human ServicesOASIS OF HOPE CENTERKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC — $14,750 · Food & NutritionKIDS' FOOD BASKET INCOUR KITCHEN TABLE — $14,750 · Food & NutritionOUR KITCHEN TABLEMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES — $10,750 · OtherMEL TROTTER MINISTRIE…GUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC — $10,750 · OtherGUIDING LIGHT MISSION…+1 more — $500 · OtherHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES — $14,750 · HealthHEALTH INTERVEN…National Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc — $900 · HealthNational Kidney…WOMEN AT RISK INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,750 · InternationalWOMEN AT R…BE CAFE — $6,000 · Employment
Human Services$31,500Food & Nutrition$29,500Other$22,000Health$15,650International$10,750Employment$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC — $14,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES — $14,750 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetOUR KITCHEN TABLE — $14,750 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetAREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC — $10,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES — $10,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES — $10,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC — $10,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN AT RISK INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOASIS OF HOPE CENTER — $10,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBE CAFE — $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc — $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC
  • Who funds HEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES
  • Who funds OUR KITCHEN TABLE
  • Who funds AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC
  • Who funds MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES
  • Who funds WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES
  • Who funds GUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC
  • Who funds WOMEN AT RISK INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds OASIS OF HOPE CENTER
  • Who funds BE CAFE
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Corewell Health Group Return · The Meijer Foundation · Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Barnabas Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Answer Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Answer Health Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Answer Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph