Skip to content
Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911 at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911

PACC911 (Phoenix Animal Care Coalition) unites and supports pet rescue organizations throughout Arizona by fostering collaboration and providing critical resources that strengthen lifesaving efforts.

$553k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$2.2MFood & Nutrition$26kHealth$21kHuman Services$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 35 grants below total $405,923, the rows itemized in this filing. The $552,818 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $146,895 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $107k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $298k
$10,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE$28,341
ALONE NO MORE DOG RESCUE$22,653
LOVE THEM ALL$22,600
SECOND-2ND CHANCE DOG RESCUE$19,350
CHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTU$19,150
HANNAH PEARL RESCUE$17,430
DAWGZ TAILZ & WAGZ$16,350
SAVING PAWS RESCURE AZ$15,514
ARIZONA POODLE RESCUE$14,740
HOME FUR GOOD ANIMAL RESCUE &$14,521
ROTTEN ROTTIE RESCUE$13,950
Individual grant recipient$13,670
PAWS 4 LIFE AZ$13,080
SAVING ONE LIFE$11,840
Individual grant recipient$11,810
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Cherished Tails Senior Sanctu: $26k → 11%Cherished Tails Senior Sanctu: $17k → 11%Cherished Tails Senior Sanctu: $15k → 11%Lucys Hope Sanctuary & Rescu: $14k → 15%Underdog Rescue of Arizona: $13k → 11%Underdog Rescue of Arizona: $13k → 11%Arizona Poodle Rescue: $25k → 11%CHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTU: $19k → 15%SECOND-2ND CHANCE DOG RESCUE: $19k → 11%Second- 2nd Chance Dog Rescue: $19k → 11%Second- 2nd Chance Dog Rescue: $17k → 11%Arizona Husky Rescue: $13k → 11%AZ HAART RESCUE: $14k → 11%Alone No More Dogs: $23k → 11%ALONE NO MORE DOG RESCUE: $23k → 11%Alone No more Dog Rescue: $18k → 11%Paws 4 Life AZ: $16k → 11%Mini Mighty Mutts: $15k → 11%PAWS 4 LIFE AZ: $13k → 11%Paws 4 a Cause: $27k → 11%Paws 4 A Cause: $19k → 11%Arizona Poodle Rescue: $17k → 11%Rotten Rottie Rescue: $20k → 11%Rotten Rottie Rescue: $19k → 11%ROTTEN ROTTIE RESCUE: $14k → 11%Arizona Poodle Rescue: $23k → 11%Freedom Brothers Rescue: $18k → 11%ARIZONA POODLE RESCUE: $15k → 11%HOME FUR GOOD ANIMAL RESCUE &: $15k → 11%Love Them All: $49k → 11%Love Them All: $43k → 11%Two Chihuahas Rescue: $36k → 11%Two Chihuahas Rescue: $24k → 11%LOVE THEM ALL: $23k → 11%DAWGZ TAILZ & WAGZ: $16k → 11%HANNAH PEARL RESCUE: $17k → 11%WEST VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE: $28k → 11%Saving Paws Rescue AZ: $32k → 11%Saving Orphan Souls Rescue: $14k → 11%Boxer Luv Rescue: $21k → 11%Surrendered Souls Rescue: $29k → 11%Surrendered Souls Rescue: $24k → 11%Animal Benefit Club: $17k → 11%Sky Sanctuary Rescue: $14k → 11%Animal Benefit Club--ABC: $13k → 11%Americas Freedom Paws: $14k → 11%Americas Freedom Paws: $13k → 11%Dogtree Pines Senior Dog Sanc: $14k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 51 repeat orgs$371k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
29

Total granted

$2.2M
$283k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+15%

Still filing today

51%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAVING PAWS RESCUE AZ
    7× · 2019–2025 · $177k · revenue +153%
  • CT
    CHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTUARY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $100k · revenue +292%
  • AP
    ARIZONA POODLE RESCUE INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $86k · revenue +510%

Funded once

  • AA
    ARIZONA ANIMAL RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2018 · $32k
  • AN
    Alone No More Dogs
    one grant, 2024 · $23k
  • AB
    Animal Benefit Club
    one grant, 2024 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
2
Desert Dog Rescue Inc

Animal rescue

Animals
3
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
4
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
5
Fred's Mission Rescue and Sanctuary

Rescue dogs, which includes housing, vetting, and transport.

Animals
6
Rescue Coop
Animals
7
Raskels Rescue
Animals
8
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
9
Forgotten Tails Animal Rescue Inc

Saving dogs

Animals
10
Rescuesforjojo

Dog rescue

Animals
11
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
12
Angies Dog House

We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Happy Tails Dachshund Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Saint Francis Feline Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
23/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAVING PAWS RESCUE AZ: $176,669 · AnimalsSAVING PAWS RESCUE AZLOVE THEM ALL: $122,845 · AnimalsLOVE THEM ALLCHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTUARY: $99,732 · AnimalsCHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTUARYBOXER LUV RESCUE: $94,325 · AnimalsBOXER LUV RESCUEARIZONA POODLE RESCUE INC: $85,960 · AnimalsARIZONA POODLE RESCUE INCROTTEN ROTTIE RESCUE INC: $85,134 · AnimalsROTTEN ROTTIE RESCUE INCSky Sanctuary Rescue: $58,680 · AnimalsALONE NO MORE DOG RESCUE INC: $57,633 · AnimalsPAWS 4 A CAUSE: $45,870 · Animals+26 more: $487,527 · Animals+26 moreSECOND-2ND CHANCE DOG RESCUE: $84,165 · OtherSECOND-2ND CHANCE DOG RESCUEUnderdog Rescue of Arizona: $80,463 · OtherUnderdog Rescue of ArizonaIndividual grant recipient: $71,634 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSURRENDERED SOULS RESCUE: $64,867 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $60,849 · OtherSURRENDERED SOULS RESCUE INC: $52,550 · OtherSAVING PAWS RESCUE AZ: $49,380 · OtherPAWS 4 LIFE AZ: $47,280 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $44,665 · Other+46 more: $680,109 · Other+46 more
Animals$1,314,375Other$1,235,962

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAVING PAWS RESCUE AZ: $176,669 over 7y, 10% of budgetLOVE THEM ALL: $122,845 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetCHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTUARY: $99,732 over 6y, 13% of budgetBOXER LUV RESCUE: $94,325 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetARIZONA POODLE RESCUE INC: $85,960 over 5y, 23% of budgetROTTEN ROTTIE RESCUE INC: $85,134 over 6y, 20% of budgetSky Sanctuary Rescue: $58,680 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetALONE NO MORE DOG RESCUE INC: $57,633 over 4y, 12% of budgetPAWS 4 A CAUSE: $45,870 over 2y, 42% of budgetBetter Days Inc: $42,997 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetHELP A DOG SMILE: $41,255 over 5y, 13% of budgetAnimals Benefit Club of Arizona Inc: $41,150 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetDawgz Tailz and Wagz Llc: $40,180 over 4y, 18% of budgetHOME FUR GOOD ANIMAL RESCUE AND PLACEMENT: $31,283 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetHannahpearl Rescue: $27,430 over 2y, 14% of budgetLiving the Dream Rescue: $24,175 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetHAPPY TAILS DACHSHUND RESCUE INC: $22,492 over 3y, 12% of budgetREGAL DANE RESCUE: $21,700 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetLove Connection Dog Rescue: $21,180 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetSaving One Life: $19,340 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetArizona Small Dog Rescue: $18,992 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCOCHISE CANINE RESCUE: $17,784 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetNEWBORN KITTEN RESCUE INC: $13,400 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetLUCKY DOG RESCUE INC: $13,210 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetArizona Golden Rescue: $12,400 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetONE LOVE ARIZONA RESCUE ADVOCACY & STERILIZATION: $11,400 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS FELINE SANCTUARY: $11,200 over 1y, 30% of budgetMERCY CARE: $6,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUBY RANCH PET RESCUE AND SANCTUARY: $6,486 over 1y, 21% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN DOG RESCUE: $6,350 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetDOGTREE PINES SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $6,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFOREVER LOVED PET SANCTUARY: $5,600 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPEI PEOPLE SHAR PEI RESCUE INC: $5,100 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetFRIENDS FOR LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE: $5,099 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAVING PAWS RESCUE AZ ↗
  • Who funds LOVE THEM ALL ↗
  • Who funds CHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds BOXER LUV RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA POODLE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROTTEN ROTTIE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sky Sanctuary Rescue ↗
  • Who funds ALONE NO MORE DOG RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS 4 A CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds Better Days Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELP A DOG SMILE ↗
  • Who funds Animals Benefit Club of Arizona Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dawgz Tailz and Wagz Llc ↗
  • Who funds HOME FUR GOOD ANIMAL RESCUE AND PLACEMENT ↗
  • Who funds Hannahpearl Rescue ↗
  • Who funds Living the Dream Rescue ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY TAILS DACHSHUND RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds REGAL DANE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Love Connection Dog Rescue ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Express Foun…The Yelp FoundationTwo Pups Wellness FundCause4paws Pet Food B…Timothy T Day Foundat…Arizona Community Fou…Petsmart Charities IncPedigree FoundationThe Albertsons Compan…McKesson Foundation I…Paypal Charitable Giv…Healthy Paws Foundati…
American Express FoundationNY28.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Two Pups Wellness Fund · Cause4paws Pet Food Bank · Timothy T Day Foundation Inc · Arizona Community Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Pedigree Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Healthy Paws Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911?

    Find your warmest path to Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home