How much did PHIPPS HOUSES grant in FY2024?

PHIPPS HOUSES reported 6 grants totaling $217,113 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

PHIPPS HOUSES

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

PHIPPS HOUSES

To provide, promote and develop affordable housing for low and moderate income residents.

$217k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$118k

Largest

01What you fund

0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Housing & Shelter$2.9MCommunity Improvement$88kHuman Services$71kEducation$60kCrime & Legal$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kOther$708k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

low-income

2019

consultingstrategieschangeneighborhoodsocial

2020

partnersnationwidepolicyeducation

2021

furman

2022

legalbronxresearcheducation

2023

—

2024

bronxawardslow-incomeluncheoneducational

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $13k
$10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$50k–250k1 grant · $118k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$994M

Total assets

Largest grants

PHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS$117,786
CITIZENS HOUSING AND PLANNING COUNCIL$15,000
NEW YORK HOUSING CONFERENCE INC$15,000
THE BRONX DEFENDERS$10,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$7,500
AIA NEW YORK$5,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 25% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of PHIPPS HOUSES’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 87% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

PHIPPS HOUSESlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$936k · 11 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$936k

$2.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%

+14%

Still filing today

82%

60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PN
PHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS INC
4× · 2017–2024 · $530k · revenue +68%
NY
New York Housing Conference Inc
5× · 2019–2024 · $75k · revenue +32%
CH
Citizens Housing and Planning Council
5× · 2019–2024 · $68k · revenue +84%

Funded once

D1
DALY 180 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $2.4M · revenue +50% · 58% of their budget
LC
LA CASA DE FELICIDAD HDFC
one grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue +21%
7E
710 EAST 9TH STREET ASSOCIATION
one grant, 2017 · $115k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

New York Apartment Association Inc

Advocates for the property rights of its members (rent-regulated property owners in new york city) through legislative and legal action, keeps its membership informed on critical issues through its newsletter, seminars, website and other…

—

Nycha Ii Housing Development Fund

To faciliate housing for persons of low income in new york city.

Housing & Shelter

House New York Inc

Promote development and operation of affordable housing for low-income residents in NYS.

Housing & Shelter

Long Island Partnership Clt Housing

To provide housing within nassau and suffolk counties in new york for "persons of low income", as defined in any federal or state low income housing capital program or other type of affordable housing program.

Housing & Shelter

Hudson Yards Development Corporation

Manages the implementation of the city of new york's economic initiatives for the redevelopment of the hudson yards area of manhattan, including extension of no. 7 subway to west 34th st, construction of public amenities including parks…

Community Improvement

James Lenox House Inc

See schedule o.james lenox house, inc. is a not-for-profit rental residence for older adults in manhattan. its 99 residential apartments are provided at below market rent to persons age 55 and older who have limited financial resources.

Housing & Shelter

New York City Energy Efficiency

Delivering financing solutions and advancing markets for energy efficiency and clean energy.

Environment

New York Public Interest Research Group

The new york public interest research group fund nypirg is a non-partisan, nonprofit, research and public education organization dedicated to enhancing the public voice in critical public policy debates in order to strengthen democracy,…

—

University Neighborhood Housing Program Inc

To create, preserve, and improve affordable housing and bring needed resources to the northwest bronx.

—

Neighborhood Renewal Housing

The corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of perserving and creating, on a non-profit basis, housing projects for persons of low and moderate income. in addition to promoting affordable housing opportunities, it seeks to…

Housing & Shelter

Neighbors Helping Neighbors Inc

Nhn promotes racial justice while empowering low and moderate-income new yorkers to fight for, secure and maintain quality housing and build financial assets. nhn is a hud-certfied cousling agency based in brooklyn, new york.

Housing & Shelter

Housing Works Housing Development Fund

Provides permanent supportive housing to homeless, low-income new yorkers living with hiv/aids.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Housing Conference Inc and the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

06the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/18

Grantees still filing

14/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Housing & Shelter$2,854,439Other$708,001Community Improvement$87,500Human Services$71,000Education$60,000Crime & Legal$35,000Public Safety & Disaster$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Robin Hood Foundation · The Community Preservation Corporation · Katten Muchin Rosenman Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PHIPPS HOUSES funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DALY 180 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +50% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 462496701 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DALY 180 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 58% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Phipps Houses?

Find your warmest path to Phipps Houses through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PHIPPS HOUSES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Phipps Houses?

More from the funding graph

PHIPPS HOUSES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Phipps Houses?

More from the funding graph