· Public charity
Phipps Houses
PHIPPS HOUSES was founded by henry phipps in 1905 to provide affordable and well-designed housing for working class new yorkers.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $170,786 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $217,113 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $46,327 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $118k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS | $117,786 |
| CITIZENS HOUSING AND PLANNING COUNCIL | $15,000 |
| NEW YORK HOUSING CONFERENCE INC | $15,000 |
| THE BRONX DEFENDERS | $10,000 |
| NEW YORK UNIVERSITY | $7,500 |
| AIA NEW YORK | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 13% of Phipps Houses’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 87% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against -49% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PNPHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS INC4× · 2017–2024 · $530k · revenue +32%
- NYNEW YORK HOUSING CONFERENCE INC5× · 2019–2024 · $75k · revenue +24%
- LILoisaida Inc4× · 2017–2022 · $50k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- D1DALY 180 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATIONone grant, 2021 · $2.4M · revenue -53% · 58% of their budget
- LCLA CASA DE FELICIDAD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue +35%
- 7E710 EAST 9TH STREET ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2017 · $115k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To faciliate housing for persons of low income in new york city.
See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…
Neighborhood housing services of new york city (nhsnyc), through lending, financial literacy, and housing counseling services, empowers disadvantaged low and moderate-income new yorkers to purchase and preserve affordable housing…
The corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of perserving and creating, on a non-profit basis, housing projects for persons of low and moderate income. in addition to promoting affordable housing opportunities, it seeks to…
The corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of perserving and creating, on a non-profit basis, housing projects for persons of low and moderate income. in addition to promoting affordable housing opportunities, it seeks to…
Long island partnership clt housing development fund company, inc. (lipclt) was established to provide housing within nassau and suffolk counties in new york for "persons of low income", as defined in any federal or state low income…
Housing works housing development fund corporation provides permanent supportive housing to homeless, low-income new yorkers living with hiv/aids. revenue comes from government contracts and residents' rent. resident rent is capped at 30%…
The Organization is commited to the preservation, development, and management of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities:community and economic development initiative and human services to effect social change in central…
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
The corporation was formed in merger with jha housing corporation and is serving as the holding company for the property.
To create, preserve, and improve affordable housing and bring needed resources to the northwest bronx.
Nyaa provides services to landlords including computerized rent registration of rent stabilized apartments with the new york state division of housing and community renewal in compliance with nys & nyc laws & regulations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Settlement Housing Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DALY 180 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS INC ↗
- Who funds LA CASA DE FELICIDAD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK HOUSING CONFERENCE INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS HOUSING & PLANNING COUNCIL OF N ↗
- Who funds Loisaida Inc ↗
- Who funds VIA VERDE HOMES HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds THE BRONX DEFENDERS ↗
- Who funds MHANY MANAGEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds West Harlem Group Assistance Inc ↗
- Who funds Ayuda Puerto Rico Inc ↗
- Who funds New York University School of Law Foundation ↗
- Who funds JAMES LENOX HOUSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds SETTLEMENT HOUSING FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Phipps Houses funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.