· Private foundation
Phillips-Green Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOUNT SINAI PHILLIPS SCHOOL OF NURSING | $5,400 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $4,500 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE | $4,000 |
| PALESTINIAN CIHLDREN'S RELIEF FUND | $3,250 |
| JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE | $3,000 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | $2,500 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $2,500 |
| UNH FRANKLIN PIERCE SCHOOL OF LAW | $2,100 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NE | $2,000 |
| UNICEF USA | $2,000 |
| RILEY'S CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT | $1,100 |
| HIAS | $1,000 |
| CHUM | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY HOUSING ORGANIZATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
71 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 44 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC9× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +81%
- TITHE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH6× · 2017–2022 · $14k · revenue +24%
PRO PUBLICA INC7× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- TCTRURO CENTER FOR THE ARTSone grant, 2021 · $15k
- MSMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +37%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.
Public knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. we work to shape policy on behalf of the public interest.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
The foundation's mission is to produce, support and promote high-quality journalism focused on underserved issue and focus areas in order to educate and inform the public and ensure widespread, ongoing public access to educational,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights First and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds WELLFLEET HARBOR ACTORS THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds KIND INC ↗
- Who funds THE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Project Kesher ↗
- Who funds LOWER CAPE COD COMMUNITY DEVELOP- MENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND STAGE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FURNITURE CRAFTSMANSHIP ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MAIN IDEA INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Aetna Foundation Inc · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Tides Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Phillips-Green Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Dream Program Inc — 100% of income from government
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Center for Coastal Studies Inc — 26% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Outer Cape Health Services Inc — 18% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
- Provincetown Arts Press Inc — 2% of income from government
- Lower Cape Cod Community Develop- Ment Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Phillips-Green Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Phillips-Green Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.