Skip to content

· Private foundation

Philip J Curtis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$358kYouth Development$328kEducation$241kHealth$33kCrime & Legal$3kFood & Nutrition$2kHousing & Shelter$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$316k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Spring Arbor Univ$50,000
Jackson School of Arts$11,000
Cattle Track Arts$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MI Theatre - Jackson$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Jackson Interfarth Sh$1,000
Mayo Clinic$1,000
Dawn Farms$1,000
Family Service Jackson$1,000
Turning Point USA$500
Western High School$500
Cascades Humane Society$500
TurnIn2Sports$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Cattle Track Arts & Pre: $20k → 11%Jackson School of Arts: $55k → 13%Purple Rose Theatre: $15k → 14%Cattle Track Arts: $10k → 11%Arts & Cultural Allianc: $25k → 13%Purple Rose Theatre: $10k → 14%Rise Above: $10k → 13%Purple Rose Theatre: $10k → 14%PC Curtis Charitable Tr: $1k → 11%Rise Above: $5k → 13%Univ of Michigan: $20k → 14%Phoenix Art Museum: $50k → 11%Jackson School of Arts: $5k → 13%University of MI: $5k → 14%Mayo Clinic: $1k → 11%Rise Above: $5k → 13%Dawn Farms: $1k → 14%Arts & Cultural Allianc: $3k → 13%Arts & Cultural All: $3k → 13%Rise Above: $2k → 13%Soar Cafe & Farms: $2k → 13%Segue Inc: $10k → 13%Jackson School of Arts: $250k → 13%Mi Theatre Jackson MI: $75k → 13%Jackson School of Arts: $60k → 13%Michigan Theatre Jack: $48k → 13%Jackson School of Arts: $45k → 13%Michigan Theatre: $33k → 13%Jackson School of Arts: $25k → 13%Michigan Theatre: $25k → 13%Michigan Theatre-Jack: $20k → 13%Jackson School of Arts: $18k → 13%Jackson School of Arts: $11k → 13%Jackson Co Parks: $10k → 13%Jackson School of Arts: $10k → 13%Jackson Symphony Orch: $10k → 13%Jackson School of Arts: $7k → 13%Jackson Symphony Orch: $6k → 13%Jackson Symphony Orch: $5k → 13%MI Theatre - Jackson: $5k → 13%Jackson Symphony Orch: $5k → 13%Friends of Recovery CT: $2k → 13%Jackson Interfarth Sh: $1k → 13%Family Service Jackson: $1k → 13%Grow Jackson: $1k → 13%Lost Rail Museum: $3k → 13%Spring Arbor Univ: $50k → 13%Spring Arbor Univ FD: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$668k · 8 repeat orgs$334k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$668k
$253k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+19%

Still filing today

50%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthFood & NutritionEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JS
    Jackson School of Arts
    6× · 2020–2025 · $485k
  • MT
    Michigan Theatre Jack
    2× · 2022–2023 · $68k
  • TP
    THE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $35k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • MT
    Mi Theatre Jackson MI
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • MT
    Michigan Theatre
    one grant, 2020 · $58k
  • PA
    PHOENIX ART MUSEUM
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
2
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
3
St Andrews Episcopal Church Jackson
—
4
Jes & Us - the Jack Elton Snyder Foundation
Youth Development
5
Ella Sharp Museum Association of Jackson

The ella sharp museum provides opportunities for everyone to explore, engage in, and enjoy history and the arts.

Arts & Culture
6
The Stephen E and Shelley S Jackson Family Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Cleary University

To provide a business education that equips individuals to deliver superior service to employers and their communities.

Education
8
Michigan State University College of Law

The mission of the michigan state university college of law is to provide a rigorous educational program which prepares a diverse community of students to be national and international leaders in private legal practice, business and…

—
9
The Enterprise Group of Jackson Inc

The enterprise group will build and sustain a vibrant, diversified econocy, thereby improving jackson's quality of life. the enterprise group's mission is to help entrepreneuers and businesses break ground in jackson county on a new…

—
10
The Jackson Foundation
Philanthropy
11
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

—
12
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Purple Rose Theatre Company; the most unlike its peers is Philip C Curtis Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jackson School of Arts: $485,100 · OtherJackson School of ArtsMi Theatre Jackson MI: $75,000 · OtherMi Theatre Jackson MIMichigan Theatre Jack: $68,333 · OtherMichigan Theatre JackMichigan Theatre: $58,330 · OtherMichigan TheatreArts & Cultural Allianc: $28,000 · Other+21 more: $109,200 · Other+21 morePHOENIX ART MUSEUM: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePHOENIX AR…THE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANY: $35,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PURPLE…THE MICHIGAN THEATRE OF JACKSON INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MICHIG…+2 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureSpring Arbor University: $50,000 · EducationRISE ABOVE: $22,000 · Youth DevelopmentSEGUE INC: $10,000 · HealthSOAR CAFE AND FARMS: $2,500 · Crime & LegalGROW JACKSON: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$823,963Arts & Culture$93,000Education$50,000Youth Development$22,000Health$10,000Crime & Legal$2,500Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHOENIX ART MUSEUM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSpring Arbor University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANY: $35,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetRISE ABOVE: $22,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $20,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetSEGUE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOAR CAFE AND FARMS: $2,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLOST RAILWAY MUSEUM: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGROW JACKSON: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJackson Interfaith Shelter: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILIP C CURTIS CHARITABLE TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetCASCADES HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHOENIX ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Spring Arbor University ↗
  • Who funds THE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds RISE ABOVE ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds SEGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHIGAN THEATRE OF JACKSON INC ↗
  • Who funds SOAR CAFE AND FARMS ↗
  • Who funds LOST RAILWAY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds GROW JACKSON ↗
  • Who funds Jackson Interfaith Shelter ↗
  • Who funds PHILIP C CURTIS CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CASCADES HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNIN2 SPORTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alvin L Glick FoundationMI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alvin L Glick Foundation · Lavery Foundation · Phil & Pat Willis Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Addison P Cook III Foundation · Jackson Community Foundation · Gaynel Fausell Charitable Trust · Mabel Harris Trust · Willard R and Lucille W Cowan · John George Jr Paragraph X Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Philip J Curtis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Philip J Curtis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Philip J Curtis Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Philip J Curtis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Philip J Curtis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph