· Community foundation
Jackson Community Foundation
We connect people and resources to causes that strengthen and build our community for Jackson for good forever.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 46 grants below total $1,872,494 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,546,942 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $674,448 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k33 grants · $665k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $656k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIRST in Michigan | $500,000 |
| Dahlem Conservancy | $221,241 |
| The Shop Rat Foundation Inc | $150,000 |
| 228 Michigan Ave LLC | $105,110 |
| FIRST | $100,000 |
| College and Career Access Center | $80,000 |
| Center for Family Health Inc | $36,687 |
| Jackson Interfaith Shelter | $36,334 |
| Hanover-Horton School District | $35,377 |
| South Michigan Food Bank | $34,297 |
| Jackson Community Foundation | $31,856 |
| MyPlace Inc | $31,341 |
| St Mary Star of the Sea Catholic Church | $26,002 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| Hope Kitchen | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
74 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $301k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FIFIRST IN MICHIGAN6× · 2020–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +43%
- TDTHE DAHLEM CONSERVANCY4× · 2022–2025 · $845k · revenue +5% · 34% of their budget
- TSTHE SHOP RAT FOUNDATION INC6× · 2018–2025 · $707k · revenue +864% · 53% of their budget
Funded once
- TETHE ENTERPRISE GROUP COMMUNITY VENTURES CORPORATIONone grant, 2020 · $1.4M · revenue -21%
- ESEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
- AAARTS AND CULTURAL ALLIANCE OFone grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of jackson community ambulance is to provide high-quality out-of-hospital care and transportation services to the communities we serve.
To be a multifaceted housing organization devoted to catalyzing intentional on and off site collaborative partnerships that reduces homelessness and creates sustainable communities through affordable quality housing continued education job…
To be a leading driver and advocate for community and economic development in jackson county.
The enterprise group will build and sustain a vibrant, diversified econocy, thereby improving jackson's quality of life. the enterprise group's mission is to help entrepreneuers and businesses break ground in jackson county on a new…
Our vision is to seek the wholistic wellbeing of the Jackson neighborhood, where residents are known, valued, and empowered to collaborate for the thriving of its people and place.
Jackson county united way assesses needs, secures resources and strategically invests those resources to create lasting, measurable change in the areas of education, health and financial stability for all people in jackson county.
Assist in the development of projects in cooperation with the local government and civic bodies that secure additional employment opportunities and facilities in jackson county indiana.
Enhance delivery of quality, integrated, accessible services
To provide high quality, comprehensive child development and after school care to ensure that children can reach their highest potential
Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.
To provide the best possible electric service to all who desire it within the system area at a reasonable cost consistent with the highest standards of service.
Works to end environmental injustice by empowering communities at the grassroots level.the corporation is organzied exclusively for charitable, religious, educational and scientific purposes, including for such purposes, the makeing of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jackson School of the Arts Assoc and the most unlike its peers is Shalom Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIRST IN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds THE ENTERPRISE GROUP COMMUNITY VENTURES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE DAHLEM CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THE SHOP RAT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE AND CAREER ACCESS CENTER OF JACKSON ↗
- Who funds Jackson YMCA Inc ↗
- Who funds For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) ↗
- Who funds Center for Family Health ↗
- Who funds NONPROFIT NETWORK ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WA FOOTE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Jackson Interfaith Shelter ↗
- Who funds Family Service and Childrens Aid ↗
- Who funds JACKSON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Michigan Advocacy Program ↗
- Who funds Spring Arbor University ↗
- Who funds Greater Jackson Habitat for Humanity ↗
- Who funds SAVE OUR YOUTH HELP THEM PROSPER ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Jackson School of the Arts Assoc ↗
- Who funds THE JACKSON FRIENDLY HOME ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
- Who funds MYPLACE INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR MOTT COMMUNITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Aware Inc ↗
- Who funds ELLA SHARP MUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF JACKSON ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN COLLEGE ACCESS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN DISPUTE RESOLUTION SER ↗
- Who funds GROW JACKSON ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Alvin L Glick Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · John George Jr Paragraph X Trust · Lavery Foundation · Wa Foote Memorial Hospital · Phil & Pat Willis Foundation · Speckhard-Knight Charitable Foundation · United Way of South Central Michigan · United Way of Jackson County · The Hurst Foundation · Addison P Cook III Foundation · Louis Glick Memorial & Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jackson Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.