Skip to content
Philadelphia Flyers Alumni Association at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Philadelphia Flyers Alumni Association

The Philadelphia Flyers Alumni Association was formed to provide support and assistance to organizations and individuals, specifically children and young adults in underserved areas in the Philadelphia and surrounding communities.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Youth Development$746kHealth$223kRecreation & Sports$162kEducation$66kPhilanthropy$32kHuman Services$10kCommunity Improvement$8kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $65,581, the rows itemized in this filing. The $99,799 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $34,218 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
$8,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$649k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Help Hope Live$24,581
Comcast Spectacor Charities$17,500
Feasterville Business Association$8,500
Sunshine Foundation$5,000
Hope for Hallie$5,000
The Arc of Haywood Cnty$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YMCA of Bucks County: $10k → 6%Philadelphia Warriors: $100k → 9%PHILADELPHIA WARRIORS: $25k → 9%Philadelphia Warriors: $10k → 9%Philadelphia Warriors: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 9 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+32%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    ED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY & EDUCATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $746k · revenue +103%
  • HI
    HELPHOPELIVE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $151k · revenue +41%
  • PW
    PHILADELPHIA WARRIORS HOCKEY CLUB
    4× · 2021–2024 · $143k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • RC
    RIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +98%
  • SD
    SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
  • WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Holy Redeemer Health System

As a catholic health system, rooted in the tradition of the sisters of the holy redeemer, we care, comfort and heal, following the example of jesus, proclaiming the hope god offers in the midst of human struggle.

Health
4
Golf Association of Philadelphia Foundation
Recreation & Sports
5
Police Athletic League of Philadelphia
Youth Development
6
Pennsylvania Health Care Association

To elevate, educate and advocate on behalf of the commonwealth's most vulnerable, their caregivers and their providers of long-term care in sustaining a robust quality long-term care continuum in pennsylvania.

—
7
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
8
Philadelphia Convention & Visitors Bureau

The philadelphia convention & visitors bureau (phlcvb) is the official tourism promotion agency for the city of philadelphia globally, and the sales and marketing agency for the pennsylvania convention center (pcc). phlcvb markets…

—
9
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
10
Penn State Health

Penn state health's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people of pennsylvania, and beyond. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and equitable care; educates and trains (continued…

Health
11
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
12
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helphopelive Inc; the most unlike its peers is Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY & EDUCATION: $746,393 · Recreation & SportsED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY & EDUCATIONHELPHOPELIVE INC: $150,860 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE IN…+4 more: $20,000 · Health+4 morePHILADELPHIA WARRIORS HOCKEY CLUB: $143,215 · Human ServicesPHILADELPHIA …RIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesRIVER CROSSIN…Comcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Lives: $42,500 · OtherFEASTERVILLE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $16,857 · OtherMID ATLANTIC AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE ARC OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INC: $10,000 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA: $9,257 · OtherBUSINESS LEADERSHIP ORGANIZED FOR CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $57,000 · EducationTIM KERR CHARITIES INC: $26,712 · PhilanthropySUNSHINE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureRE-ENTRY DELAWARE INC: $5,000 · Employment
Recreation & Sports$746,393Health$170,860Human Services$153,215Other$88,614Education$57,000Philanthropy$31,712Arts & Culture$5,000Employment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY & EDUCATION: $746,393 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC: $150,860 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPHILADELPHIA WARRIORS HOCKEY CLUB: $143,215 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetBUSINESS LEADERSHIP ORGANIZED FOR CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $57,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetComcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Lives: $42,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTIM KERR CHARITIES INC: $26,712 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetFEASTERVILLE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $16,857 over 2y, 17% of budgetMID ATLANTIC AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUNSHINE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPENN MEDICINE-PMA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMind Your Brain Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetHOPE FOR HALLIE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMARYVILLE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…The Philadelphia Foun…The William Penn Foun…Charities Aid Foundat…Enterprise Holdings F…The Pfizer Foundation…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New JerseyPA19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Philadelphia Flyers Alumni Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Philadelphia Flyers Alumni Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Maryville Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Philadelphia Flyers Alumni Association?

Find your warmest path to Philadelphia Flyers Alumni Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Philadelphia Flyers Alumni Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home