Skip to content

· Private foundation

Phil J & Alice S Sheridan Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$14MCommunity Improvement$810kPhilanthropy$518kHuman Services$180kReligion$153kHealth$98kHousing & Shelter$57kYouth Development$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $423k
  • $250k+2 grants · $600k
$200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mount De Sales Academy$350,000
Depaul USA$250,000
New Town Macon$200,000
Middle Georgia State University$154,375
St Joseph Catholic School$68,228
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%Rescue Mission of Middle Georgia: $45k → 23%Rescue Mission of Middle Georgia: $12k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 14 repeat orgs$328k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$16M
$328k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+17%

Still filing today

43%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $11M · revenue +34%
  • NM
    NEWTOWN MACON INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $810k · revenue +155%
  • CF
    CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTH GEORGIA INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $463k · revenue +216%

Funded once

  • MO
    Mercer on Mission
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • D
    Daybreak
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Medical Center of Central Georgia Inc

To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.

Health
2
Truett Mcconnell University Inc

The mission of truett mcconnell university, a georgia baptist university, is to equip students to fulfill the great comission by fostering a christian worldview through a biblically centered education in a family-friendly environment.

Education
3
Health Services of Central Georgia Inc

The organization provides faculty physicians for the residency training programs of the medical center, navicent health (mcnh) and physicians who are in short supply in the community that are central to the mission of mcnh.

Health
4
Carson-Newman University

Mission of challenge, nurture, community: carson-newman college offers a christian, liberal arts education in an environment that encourages open intellectual inquiry and deeper spiritual maturity. students receive a personalized education…

Education
5
Methodist Home of the South Georgia Conference Inc

The methodist home of the south georgia conference, inc. is a multi-site, multipurpose organization that provides residential placement for 165 youth in fiscal year 2025. the main campus is located in macon, georgia with youth living in…

Human Services
6
Macon Recovers Inc

The mission is to mobilize resources within and outside the recovery community to increase the prevalence and quality of long-term recovery from alcohol and other drug dependency in georgia by increasing recovery capital, with a priority…

Human Services
7
Morehouse School of Medicine

Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…

Education
8
Georgia Gwinnett College Foundation Inc

The mission of the georgia gwinnett college foundation is to serve as an advocate for georgia gwinnett college, a unit of the university system of georgia. the foundation's primary objective is to receive, invest, account for, and allocate…

Education
9
King University

We prepare students in our christian academic community to excel as thoughtful, resourceful, and responsible citizens with a passion for serving god, the church, and the world. we accomplish this through excellent teaching, high…

Education
10
Tanner Medical Foundation Inc

To partner with tanner health system in providing a continuum of quality healthcare services for all of our citizens through building and strengthening of new and existing philanthropic relationships.

Health
11
Middle Georgia State University Foundation Inc

Middle georgia state university foundation strives to improve the lives of people in central georgia by enabling middle georgia state university to achieve extraordinary results. the foundation provides resources to the university and its…

Education
12
Piedmont Health Foundation
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Central Georgia Inc; the most unlike its peers is Macon Volunteer Clinic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $10,840,000 · EducationTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITYMount De Sales Academy: $2,104,293 · OtherMount De Sales AcademyDepaul USA: $1,067,500 · OtherDepaul USACATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTH GEORGIA INC: $463,000 · OtherCATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTH G…Middle Georgia State University: $193,692 · OtherMercer on Mission: $150,000 · Other+8 more: $411,650 · Other+8 moreNEWTOWN MACON INC: $810,000 · Community ImprovementNAVICENT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthMACON VOLUNTEER CLINIC INC: $32,500 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL GEORGIA: $10,000 · HealthJAY'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthRESCUE MISSION OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $56,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC: $45,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCAMPUS CLUBS INC: $10,000 · ReligionMENTORS PROJECT OF BIBB COUNTY INC: $8,000 · Youth Development
Education$10,840,000Other$4,390,135Community Improvement$810,000Health$97,500Human Services$56,500Philanthropy$55,000Religion$10,000Youth Development$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $10,840,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetNEWTOWN MACON INC: $810,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetCATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTH GEORGIA INC: $463,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $56,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNAVICENT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMACON VOLUNTEER CLINIC INC: $32,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCAMPUS CLUBS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL GEORGIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMENTORS PROJECT OF BIBB COUNTY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetJAY'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NEWTOWN MACON INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTH GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVICENT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MACON VOLUNTEER CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMPUS CLUBS INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL GEORGIA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTORS PROJECT OF BIBB COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds JAY'S HOPE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgia Power Foundation IncGA25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Peyton Anderson Foundation · Ej Grassmann Trust · John S and James L Knight Foundation · WL Amos Sr Foundation Inc co William L Amos III · James Hyde Porter Testamentary Trust · Martin Foundation Inc · Griffith Family Foundation Inc · Robins Financial Credit Union · The Ra Bowen Trust · Navicent Health Foundation Inc · Dura Connell Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Phil J & Alice S Sheridan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Phil J & Alice S Sheridan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Phil J & Alice S Sheridan Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Phil J & Alice S Sheridan Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Phil J & Alice S Sheridan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph