Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Phil and Ruth Spano Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$235k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$426kArts & Culture$300kEducation$200kPhilanthropy$176kAnimals$121kHuman Services$110kYouth Development$50k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY$75,000
CARUSO FAMILY CHARITIES$50,000
DENVER RESCUE MISSION$25,000
EMMAUS CATHOLIC HOSPICE$25,000
LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$20,000
CATHOLIC HEALTH INTITAVIES$20,000
CATHOLIC HEALTH INTITAVIES$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CANINE PARTNER OF THE ROCKIES INC: $20k → 10%CANINE PARTNER OF THE ROCKIES INC: $20k → 10%CANINE PARTNERS OF THE ROCKIES INC: $20k → 10%CANINE PARTNER OF THE ROCKIES INC: $20k → 10%CANINE PARTNERS OF THE ROCKIES INC: $20k → 10%CANINE PARTNERS OF THE ROCKIES INC: $11k → 10%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 10 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$1.3M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+9%

Still filing today

90%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $300k · revenue +62%
  • DH
    DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $215k · revenue +60%
  • CF
    CARUSO FAMILY CHARITIES
    7× · 2018–2024 · $176k · revenue +407%

Funded once

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PARTNERSHIP CRADLE TO CAREER
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +9%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF COZUMEL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Health Institute
Health
2
Catholic Charities & Community Serv of the Archdiocese of Denver

As the charitable arm of the archdiocese of denver and inspired by god's love and compassion, catholic charities extends the healing ministry of jesus christ to the poor and those in need. catholic charities of the archdiocese of denver…

Human Services
3
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
4
Commonspirit Mountain Region

We extend the healing ministry of christ by caring for those who are ill and by nurturing the health of the people in our communities.

Health
5
Hospice of Metro Denver Inc

To encircle those facing advanced illness with unprecedented levels of comfort, compassion, and expertise.

Human Services
6
Longmont United Hospital

We make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
7
Commonspirit Health Research Institute

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
8
Dignity Health Hospital and Professional Liability Self-Insurance Trust

Self-insurance program for related exempt organizations.

9
Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado

We make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
10
Mercy Medical Center

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

11
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
12
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Caruso Family Charities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $300,000 · OtherASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETYCATHOLIC HEALTH INTITAVIES — $150,000 · OtherCATHOLIC HEALTH INTITAVIES+1 more — $10,000 · OtherDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC — $215,000 · HealthDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY IN…LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $120,000 · HealthLUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDAT…COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH — $51,000 · HealthCOMMONSPIRIT HEALTHCANINE PARTNERS OF THE ROCKIES INC — $111,000 · Human ServicesCANINE PARTNERS OF…DENVER RESCUE MISSION — $110,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE MISS…CARUSO FAMILY CHARITIES — $176,000 · PhilanthropyCARUSO FAMILY …HEARTLIGHT CENTER INC — $75,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S RESOURCE CENTER — $15,000 · EducationROCKY MOUNTAIN PARTNERSHIP CRADLE TO CAREER — $50,000 · Youth Development
Other$460,000Health$386,000Human Services$221,000Philanthropy$176,000Education$90,000Youth Development$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $300,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC — $215,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetCARUSO FAMILY CHARITIES — $176,000 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetLUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $120,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCANINE PARTNERS OF THE ROCKIES INC — $111,000 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTLIGHT CENTER INC — $75,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetCOMMONSPIRIT HEALTH — $51,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PARTNERSHIP CRADLE TO CAREER — $50,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S RESOURCE CENTER — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC
  • Who funds CARUSO FAMILY CHARITIES
  • Who funds LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CANINE PARTNERS OF THE ROCKIES INC
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds HEARTLIGHT CENTER INC
  • Who funds COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PARTNERSHIP CRADLE TO CAREER
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S RESOURCE CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Phil and Ruth Spano Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph