Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pf Foundation Inc

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2018
12
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Youth Development$66kEducation$44kReligion$20kRecreation & Sports$11kScience & Tech$6kFood & Nutrition$4kHealth$4kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2018 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k9 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $44k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$398k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLIVET BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$21,000
Girl Scouts of Eastern PA$12,500
JOHN PAUL II CENTER FOR SPECIAL$10,000
Rendell Center for Civics and$5,000
ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY$5,000
ALBRIGHT COLLEGE$5,000
FOUNDATION FOR READING AREA$3,000
Thiel College$2,500
Greater Berks Food Bank$2,000
RICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION$1,850
Reading Public Library$1,000
Children's Home of Reading$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Children's Home of Reading: $1k → 11%SAFE BERKS: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$135k · 8 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$135k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+55%

Still filing today

63%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OB
    OLIVET BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF READING AND BERKS COUNTY PA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $41k · revenue +1%
  • AU
    ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +51%
  • HH
    HELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • RR
    READING RECREATION COMMISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +26%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • BN
    BERKS NATUREgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +113%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Reading Berks Association of Realtors Inc

The reading berks association of realtors promotes a high standard of professionalism, advocates for private property rights, and strives to improve the quality of life in our communities.

—
2
Reading Hospital

Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

Health
3
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
4
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
8
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
9
Lycoming College

The mission of lycoming college is to provide a distinguished baccalaureate education in the liberal arts and sciences within a coeducational, supportive, and residential setting.

Education
10
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
11
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
12
Oberlin College

Oberlin College and Conservatory educate students for lives of intellectual, musical and artistic rigor and breadth, sustained inquiry, creativity and innovation, and leadership. Oberlin aims to prepare graduates with the knowledge,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olivet Boys' & Girls' Club of Reading and Berks County Pa; the most unlike its peers is Alvernia University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Girl Scouts of Eastern PA: $25,000 · OtherGirl Scouts of Eastern PAJOHN PAUL II CENTER FOR SPECIAL: $20,000 · OtherJOHN PAUL II CENTER FOR SPECIALALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherALVERNIA UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOUNDATION FOR READING AREA: $6,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR READING AREARendell Center for Civics and: $5,000 · OtherRendell Center for Civics andHELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK: $4,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherOLIVET BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF READING AND BERKS COUNTY PA: $41,000 · Youth DevelopmentOLIVET BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB O…ALBRIGHT COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationALBRIGHT COLLEGETHIEL COLLEGE: $2,500 · EducationTHIEL COLLEGEREADING RECREATION COMMISSION: $11,000 · Recreation & SportsRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION: $3,700 · HealthBERKS NATURE: $2,000 · EnvironmentThe Children's Home of Reading: $1,000 · Human ServicesSAFE BERKS: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$78,000Youth Development$41,000Education$27,500Recreation & Sports$11,000Health$3,700Environment$2,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLIVET BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF READING AND BERKS COUNTY PA: $41,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetALBRIGHT COLLEGE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADING RECREATION COMMISSION: $11,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION: $3,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHIEL COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERKS NATURE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Children's Home of Reading: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE BERKS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Breidegam Family FoundationPA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Breidegam Family Foundation · Berks County Community Foundation Inc · Henry Janssen Foundation · The Wyomissing Foundation Inc · Penn Entertainment Foundation · United Way of Berks County Inc · The Cynthia and Jim Boscov Family Foundation · The Kindness Coalition · Blue Mountain Foundation · Marlin Miller Jr Family Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pf Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pf Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pf Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pf Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pf’s filings →

    More from the funding graph