Skip to content
Petrovic Gubin Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Petrovic Gubin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$420k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$520kInternational$250kFood & Nutrition$160kPhilanthropy$100kEducation$100kEmployment$50kYouth Development$50kArts & Culture$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $350k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINSHIP COMMUNITY FOOD$100,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$50,000
LOCAL 212 FAST FUND$50,000
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FDN$50,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MILWAUKEE$50,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$50,000
THE STUDIOS OF KEY WEST$45,000
FOOD FREEDOM MILWAUKEE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WALKERS POINT YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $25k → 17%WALKERS POINT YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WI
MA
OH
CA
VA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$920k · 7 repeat orgs$415k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$920k
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+10%

Still filing today

71%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementEmploymentHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    T-1 TODAY INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $300k · revenue +78%
  • TD
    The diaTribe Foundation
    3× · 2021–2023 · $125k · revenue +2%
  • EMPLOY MILWAUKEE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • TC
    TAKING CONTROL OF YOUR DIABETES DBA TCOYD
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +0%
  • BO
    BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GRANT FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • UR
    UWM RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Diabetes Action Research and Education Foundation

Diabetes action research and education foundation is committed to the prevention and treatment of diabetes and to the funding of innovative, promising research aimed at finding a cure for diabetes and diabetes-related complications.

Health
2
T1D Exchange Inc

Through real-world evidence and clinical data collection and analysis, our programs provide novel insights that identify gaps in care and refine best practices to improve the lives of those living with diabetes. t1d exchange supports…

Health
3
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
4
Diabetes Research Connection

To connect donors with early-career scientists enabling them to perform peer-reviewed research designed to prevent and cure type 1 diabetes, minimize its complications and improve the quality of life for those living with the disease.

Health
5
Diabetes Partnership of Cleveland

Diabetes partnership of cleveland works to provide relevant and sustainable programming, education, resources and supplies to the community in northeast ohio affected by diabetes.

—
6
T1INTERNATIONAL Usa T1International

We support local communities by giving them tools they need to stand up for their rights so that access to insulin and diabetes supplies becomes a reality for all.

Health
7
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute

Dedicated to improving the lives of people impacted by diabetes through research, education and care.

Health
8
Kilo Diabetes & Vascular Research Foundation

To find a cure for diabetes, preserve life, promote health and safeguard the lives of people with diabetes and vascular disease through research, education, proper care and treatment.

—
9
Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin Inc

Provide a unified voice, resources, and leadership to advance the pharmacy profession and improve the quality of medication use in wisconsin.

—
10
Tidepool Project

Tidepool Project is a non-profit organization dedicated to building an open software platform and applications that will reduce the burden of managing diabetes and lead to healthier outcomes.

Health
11
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
12
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Taking Control of Your Diabetes Dba Tcoyd; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

T-1 TODAY INC: $300,000 · HealthT-1 TODAY INCPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $250,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONThe diaTribe Foundation: $125,000 · HealthThe diaTribe FoundationTAKING CONTROL OF YOUR DIABETES DBA TCOYD: $75,000 · HealthTAKING CONTROL OF YOUR DIABETES DBA TCOYD+1 more: $10,000 · HealthKINSHIP COMMUNITY FOOD: $110,000 · OtherKINSHIP COMMUNITY FOODBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GRANT FUND: $50,000 · OtherBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE …FOOD FREEDOM MILWAUKEE INC: $50,000 · OtherFOOD FREEDOM MILWAUKEE INCLOCAL 212 FAST FUND: $50,000 · OtherLOCAL 212 FAST FUNDTEACH FOR AMERICA: $50,000 · OtherTEACH FOR AMERICA+1 more: $10,000 · OtherEMPLOY MILWAUKEE INC: $50,000 · EmploymentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentMILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE STUDIOS OF KEY WEST: $45,000 · Arts & CultureWALKER'S POINT YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesUWM RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Health$760,000Other$320,000Employment$50,000Youth Development$50,000Philanthropy$50,000Arts & Culture$45,000Human Services$35,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetT-1 TODAY INC: $300,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe diaTribe Foundation: $125,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTAKING CONTROL OF YOUR DIABETES DBA TCOYD: $75,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetEMPLOY MILWAUKEE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE STUDIOS OF KEY WEST: $45,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWALKER'S POINT YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER INC: $35,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetUWM RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Petrovic Gubin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Petrovic Gubin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Petrovic Gubin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home