· Private foundation
Petrovic Gubin Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KINSHIP COMMUNITY FOOD | $100,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA | $50,000 |
| LOCAL 212 FAST FUND | $50,000 |
| MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FDN | $50,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MILWAUKEE | $50,000 |
| PARTNERS IN HEALTH | $50,000 |
| THE STUDIOS OF KEY WEST | $45,000 |
| FOOD FREEDOM MILWAUKEE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TTT-1 TODAY INC3× · 2021–2023 · $300k · revenue +78%
- TDThe diaTribe Foundation3× · 2021–2023 · $125k · revenue +2%
EMPLOY MILWAUKEE INC2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- TCTAKING CONTROL OF YOUR DIABETES DBA TCOYDone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +0%
- BOBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GRANT FUNDone grant, 2023 · $50k
- URUWM RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Diabetes action research and education foundation is committed to the prevention and treatment of diabetes and to the funding of innovative, promising research aimed at finding a cure for diabetes and diabetes-related complications.
Through real-world evidence and clinical data collection and analysis, our programs provide novel insights that identify gaps in care and refine best practices to improve the lives of those living with diabetes. t1d exchange supports…
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
To connect donors with early-career scientists enabling them to perform peer-reviewed research designed to prevent and cure type 1 diabetes, minimize its complications and improve the quality of life for those living with the disease.
Diabetes partnership of cleveland works to provide relevant and sustainable programming, education, resources and supplies to the community in northeast ohio affected by diabetes.
We support local communities by giving them tools they need to stand up for their rights so that access to insulin and diabetes supplies becomes a reality for all.
Dedicated to improving the lives of people impacted by diabetes through research, education and care.
To find a cure for diabetes, preserve life, promote health and safeguard the lives of people with diabetes and vascular disease through research, education, proper care and treatment.
Provide a unified voice, resources, and leadership to advance the pharmacy profession and improve the quality of medication use in wisconsin.
Tidepool Project is a non-profit organization dedicated to building an open software platform and applications that will reduce the burden of managing diabetes and lead to healthier outcomes.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Taking Control of Your Diabetes Dba Tcoyd and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds T-1 TODAY INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds The diaTribe Foundation ↗
- Who funds TAKING CONTROL OF YOUR DIABETES DBA TCOYD ↗
- Who funds EMPLOY MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE STUDIOS OF KEY WEST ↗
- Who funds WALKER'S POINT YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UWM RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Petrovic Gubin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.