Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Peters Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$182k
Granted FY2021
20
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Education$204kPhilanthropy$74kReligion$69kHealth$34kHuman Services$24kArts & Culture$14kYouth Development$4kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2021 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k16 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY$50,000
CARROLL UNIVERSITY$50,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$50,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION (VELOSANO)$12,500
FRIENDS OF WISCONSIN PUBLIC TELEVISION INC$5,000
YMCA FOUNDATION$3,200
CENTRAL WI SYMPHONY$3,000
BOYS AND GIRL CLUB OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC$3,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL WISCONSIN$1,700
OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC$1,000
NORTHERN DOOR CHILDREN'S CENTER INC$1,000
WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO$1,000
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS$250
UWSP FOUNDATION$125
CREATE PORTAGE COUNTY$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NORTHERN DOOR CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $1k → 8%CAP SERVICES INC: $10k → 10%CAP SERVICES: $100 → 10%CAP SERVICES: $100 → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP INC: $100 → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP INC: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Peters Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in WI; read by stated purpose it is 85% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Peters Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$321k · 15 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$321k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+67%

Still filing today

80%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $103k · revenue +18%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $66k · revenue +14%
  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $23k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • SM
    SAINT MICHAEL'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • IL
    IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • TC
    THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
2
Southern Lakes Credit Union

We will stirve to make a significant difference in improving the quality of life of our members and the communities we serve by providing affordable access to credit and financial services.

3
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

4
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
5
United Way of Wisconsin Inc

United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…

Philanthropy
6
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
7
Portal Inc

To enhance opportunities for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) to participate fully in their community as valued neighbors, productive workers and respected citizens. portal, inc. assists more than 200 adults…

Employment
8
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
9
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce

Improve metro milwaukee as a place to create jobs, invest capital and grow business.

10
Wisconsin Medical Credit Union

Wisconsin medical cu is a not for profit, member owned organization dedicated to meet the members needs by providing sound financial services including competitive rates, information and services while maintaining financial stability of…

11
Wisconsin Center for Nursing Inc

The mission of wisconsin center for nursing, inc. is to assure an adequate, well-prepared and diverse nurse workforce for the people of wisconsin. the work of the wisconsin center for nursing continues to be focused in five core nursing…

Arts & Culture
12
Westconsin Credit Union

The organization is a cooperative, nonprofit corporation, incorporated under wisconsin state law to encourage thrift among its members, create a source of credit at a fair and reasonable cost, and provide an opportunity for its members to…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Camp Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%8%<5yr12%0%5–10yr21%8%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr16%33%35–55yr17%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%2%<5yr12%0%5–10yr21%0%10–20yr17%1%20–35yr16%37%35–55yr17%60%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
8%
394/4,987

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
20/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC — $102,500 · EducationCARROLL UNIVERSITY INCUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC — $51,375 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INCMarquette University — $50,000 · EducationMarquette UniversityUNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC — $65,750 · OtherUNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INCTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH — $38,750 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHSAINT MICHAEL'S FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherSAINT MICHAEL'S FOUNDATIONYMCA FOUNDATION — $15,750 · OtherYMCA FOUNDATIONIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH — $10,000 · OtherIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCHCENTRAL WI SYMPHONY — $6,100 · Other+13 more — $8,035 · OtherTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $22,500 · HealthASPIRUS STEVENS POINT HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC — $5,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,000 · Health+1 more — $300 · HealthCAP SERVICES INC — $10,300 · Human ServicesNORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC — $1,000 · Human Services+1 more — $200 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC — $7,800 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC — $1,500 · Arts & CultureCREATE PORTAGE COUNTY INC — $300 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE — $4,100 · Youth Development
Education$203,875Other$164,385Health$28,800Human Services$11,500Philanthropy$7,800Arts & Culture$6,800Youth Development$4,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCARROLL UNIVERSITY INC — $102,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC — $65,750 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC — $51,375 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMarquette University — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAP SERVICES INC — $10,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC — $7,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRUS STEVENS POINT HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE — $4,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCREATE PORTAGE COUNTY INC — $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP HOPE INC — $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF SCHMEECKLE RESERVE INC — $250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION BOOTSTRAP — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEVERDI MASTER CHORALE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJUSTICEWORKS LTD — $60 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SUZUKI FOUNDATION OF STEVENS POINT WISCONSIN INC — $50 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin IncWI32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin Inc · Seramur Family Foundation Inc · Delta Dental of Wisconsin Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Sentry Insurance Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · McPartland Family Foundation Inc · Noel Family Foundation Inc · Edward J Okray Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Paper City Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Peters Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph