Skip to content
Peter Nager Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Peter Nager Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Social Science$243kEducation$182kArts & Culture$121kHealth$20kRecreation & Sports$1k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,057
Median grant
2
States reached
$654k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREASTCANCERORG$10,057
DUKE UNIVERSITY FENCING TEAM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL: $1k → 7%BREASTCANCERORG: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $29k → 22%CARAMOOR CENTER FOR MUSIC AND THE ARTS: $70k → 9%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL: $60k → 20%DUKE UNIVERSITY FENCING TEAM: $1k → 11%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $20k → 14%BREASTCANCERORG: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 22%CARAMOOR CENTER FOR MUSIC AND THE ARTS: $51k → 9%SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL: $41k → 20%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $20k → 14%BEAVER DAM ASSOCIATION: $100 → 9%SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL: $40k → 20%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $19k → 14%HACKLEY SCHOOL: $12k → 9%SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL: $39k → 20%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $14k → 14%HACKLEY SCHOOL: $10k → 9%SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL: $39k → 20%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%HACKLEY SCHOOL: $10k → 9%SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL: $25k → 20%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%HACKLEY SCHOOL: $10k → 9%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%HACKLEY SCHOOL: $5k → 9%RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$431k · 4 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$431k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+4%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthEducationSocial ScienceArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL
    6× · 2017–2022 · $243k · revenue -35%
  • CC
    Caramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $121k · revenue -58%
  • HS
    HACKLEY SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $47k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • RC
    RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +4%
  • BD
    BEAVER DAM ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art

See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…

Education
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rye Country Day School; the most unlike its peers is Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL: $242,604 · Social ScienceSOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCILCaramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc: $120,712 · Arts & CultureCaramoor Center for Musi…BROWN UNIVERSITY: $92,311 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITYHACKLEY SCHOOL: $47,355 · HealthHACKLEY SCHOO…BREASTCANCERORG: $19,968 · HealthBREASTCANCERO…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $39,212 · Education+3 more: $3,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY FENCING TEAM: $1,000 · OtherBEAVER DAM ASSOCIATION: $100 · Other
Social Science$242,604Arts & Culture$120,712Community Improvement$92,311Health$67,323Education$42,212Other$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL: $242,604 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCaramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc: $120,712 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $92,311 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHACKLEY SCHOOL: $47,355 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $39,212 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREASTCANCERORG: $19,968 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peter Nager Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peter Nager Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peter Nager Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Peter Nager Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peter Nager’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home