Skip to content

· Public charity

Peter Hopkins Foundation Inc

The mission of the peter hopkins foundation is to enhance the lives of children and families living with severe disabilities and debilitating diseases.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Health$476kRecreation & Sports$75k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$48k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION$45,000
CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA - MEDICALLY COMPLEX CARE PROGRAM$40,000
EXTRA SPECIAL PEOPLE$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR PEROXISOMAL DISORDERS: $51k → 15%EXTRA SPECIAL PEOPLE: $30k → 6%ADAPTIVE LEARNING CENTER - ATLANTA: $64k → 8%CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA - MEDICALLY COMPLEX CARE PROGRAM: $51k → 14%ADAPTIVE LEARNING CENTER - ATLANTA: $51k → 8%THE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION: $45k → 14%THE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA - MEDICALLY COMPLEX CARE PROGRAM: $64k → 14%CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA - MEDICALLY COMPLEX CARE PROGRAM: $40k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR PEROXISOMAL DISORDERS: $176,489 · HealthGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR PEROXISOMAL DISORDERSCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA GROUP RETURN: $154,541 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA GROUP RETURNTHE ADAPTIVE LEARNING CENTER FOR INFANTS AND CHILDREN INC: $114,541 · HealthTHE ADAPTIVE LEARNING CENTER FOR INFANTS AND CHILDREN INCTHE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · PhilanthropyTHE KYLE PEASE …Extra Special People Inc: $30,000 · Other
Health$445,571Philanthropy$75,000Other$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR PEROXISOMAL DISORDERS: $176,489 over 2y, 15% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA GROUP RETURN: $154,541 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADAPTIVE LEARNING CENTER FOR INFANTS AND CHILDREN INC: $114,541 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetTHE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetExtra Special People Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peter Hopkins Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peter Hopkins Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peter Hopkins Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Peter Hopkins Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peter Hopkins’ filings →

    More from the funding graph