Skip to content
Peter H and Marietta K Bach Charitable Trust Conservatorship at a glance

· Private foundation

Peter H and Marietta K Bach Charitable Trust Conservatorship

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$355k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$961kHealth$424kPhilanthropy$256kArts & Culture$220kEducation$166kHuman Services$146kPublic Safety & Disaster$112kRecreation & Sports$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $100k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $202k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$5,700
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOISHE HOUSE$53,000
NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM$42,200
CEDARS SINAI$33,350
JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION$26,100
Individual grant recipient$20,000
JEWISH FEDERATION$15,300
GETTY HOUSE FOUNDATION$13,099
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$11,196
FELLOWS OF CONTEMPORARY ART$10,554
TOWER CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$10,289
WOMENS GUILD CEDARS SINAI$10,250
JVS$10,000
BH FIRE FIGHTER ASSN$9,500
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$9,440
CONCERN FOUNDATION$8,718
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FIGHT FOR THE FORGOTTEN: $6k → 16%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $100 → 17%DREAM FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%DREAM FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%DREAM FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $2k → 14%DREAM FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $100 → 14%DREAM FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%DREAM FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%JEWISH CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $1k → 14%JEWISH CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $500 → 14%JEWISH CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $500 → 14%PATH: $3k → 14%QUILTING FOR COMMUNITY: $151 → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $100 → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $16k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $15k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $13k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $11k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $10k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $9k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $7k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 70 repeat orgs$294k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

70 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

70
81

Total granted

$2.5M
$273k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+15%

Still filing today

51%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MOISHE HOUSE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $372k · revenue +123%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $165k · revenue +62%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HILLEL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $152k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $65k
  • WI
    Well Incorporatedgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +554%
  • HF
    HILLELTHE FOUNDATION FOR
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc

Simon wiesenthal center, inc. (the center) is a global jewish human rights activist organization that confronts anti-semitism, hate, stands with israel, defends the safety of jews worldwide, and teaches the lessons of the holocaust for…

Arts & Culture
7
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
8
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
9
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
10
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
11
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Place for Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Ark Antiques. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 165 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/78
Grantees still filing
51/78
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION: $181,086 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HILLEL FOUNDATION: $152,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HILLEL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $145,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $115,020 · OtherJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATIONUNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUE: $86,575 · OtherUNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUEBH FIRE FIGHTER ASSN: $71,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherJVS: $63,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $54,490 · Other+111 more: $635,288 · Other+111 moreMOISHE HOUSE: $371,900 · ReligionMOISHE HOUSEHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $164,866 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION …Well Incorporated: $30,000 · Religion+2 more: $7,933 · ReligionSHAREWELL: $76,300 · Arts & CultureTHE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM SANTA MARIA CALIFORNIA: $52,531 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $35,706 · Arts & CultureGETTY HOUSE FOUNDATION: $18,599 · Arts & CultureFELLOWS OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $11,804 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $20,728 · Arts & CultureCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $105,000 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $26,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION: $23,867 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $11,940 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $9,000 · Health+6 more: $6,190 · HealthCONCERN FOUNDATION: $132,536 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPLEDGELING FOUNDATION: $7,911 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $6,025 · PhilanthropySanta Barbara Hillel: $5,800 · Philanthropy+2 more: $150 · PhilanthropyFULFILLMENT FUND: $85,484 · Human ServicesDALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION: $9,528 · Human ServicesTHE JUSTIN WREN FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Human Services+7 more: $6,451 · Human ServicesNorthwestern University: $44,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,568,959Religion$574,699Arts & Culture$215,668Health$182,497Philanthropy$162,422Human Services$107,463Recreation & Sports$44,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOISHE HOUSE: $371,900 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $164,866 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HILLEL FOUNDATION: $152,000 over 7y, 9.3% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $132,536 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $115,020 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $105,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND: $85,484 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSHAREWELL: $76,300 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $48,724 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetNorthwestern University: $44,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $35,706 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL 818: $31,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetWell Incorporated: $30,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $26,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION: $23,867 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGETTY HOUSE FOUNDATION: $18,599 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ARK ANTIQUES: $13,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $11,940 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWS OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $11,804 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $11,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION: $9,528 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPitzer College: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOODCRAFT RANGERS: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJQ INTERNATIONAL: $7,383 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $7,075 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $6,025 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUSTIN WREN FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSanta Barbara Hillel: $5,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $5,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $5,098 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHASE ONE FOUNDATION: $3,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISE READERS TO LEADERS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBETTER WORLD FUND INC: $2,575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $2,540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ADVOCATES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Center for Justice: $2,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC: $1,880 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FULFILLMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds SHAREWELL ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM SANTA MARIA CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL 818 ↗
  • Who funds Well Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GETTY HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ARK ANTIQUES ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWS OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…James & Edith Ross Fo…California Community …Jewish Federation Cou…Liberty Hill Foundati…Shapiro Family Charit…The Rosalinde and Art…Richard and Ruth Lavi…Wurwand FoundationThe Ahmanson Foundati…Kayne Anderson Capita…The Annenberg Foundat…
Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA32.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · James & Edith Ross Foundation · California Community Foundation · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Liberty Hill Foundation · Shapiro Family Charitable Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · Richard and Ruth Lavine Family Foundation · Wurwand Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peter H and Marietta K Bach Charitable Trust Conservatorship funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peter H and Marietta K Bach Charitable Trust Conservatorship. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Our House Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Well Incorporated: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 165 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peter H and Marietta K Bach Charitable Trust Conservatorship’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home