Skip to content
Peter Degeorge Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Peter Degeorge Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Philanthropy$24MHealth$1.7MCrime & Legal$453kYouth Development$90kAnimals$76kArts & Culture$25kInternational$10kEducation$5k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$90,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PETER DEGEORGE CHARITABLE TRUST$90,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $10k → 11%THE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 8 repeat orgs$557k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$25M
$557k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+41%

Still filing today

63%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
HealthPhilanthropyAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $956k · revenue +70% · 82% of their budget
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    2× · 2019–2021 · $26k · revenue +60%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • DS
    DEGEORGE ST TRAINING CENTER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $453k · 94% of their budget
  • WW
    WORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Andrew Stergiopoulos Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Sir Philip Sidney Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Nicholas D Sergi Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Shoot Down Kids Cancer Foundation
Health
5
The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
—
6
Orlando Health Foundation Inc

The mission of the orlando health foundation is to support the strategic priorities of orlando health through philanthropy. this is accomplished through special events and annual major and planned gift fundraising efforts.

Health
7
American Cancer Society Trust
—
8
Nick Simons Foundation International
Philanthropy
9
Peaceful Warrior Foundation

The peaceful warrior foundation is a non-profit organization with the aim of connecting our nation's warriors with the support and care they need.at peaceful warrior we strive to help our active-duty operators & veterans be at their very…

Human Services
10
Curepsp Inc

To raise awareness, build community, improve care and find a cure for psp, cbd and msa.

Health
11
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
12
The Peter Bullough Foundation Attn Katie Mooney
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Navy Seal Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE PETER DEGEORGE CHARITABLE TRUST: $23,650,679 · PhilanthropyTHE PETER DEGEORGE CHARITABLE TRUST+1 more: $6,500 · PhilanthropyCURETIVITY: $550,000 · OtherDEGEORGE ST TRAINING CENTER INC: $452,655 · OtherCAMO FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherWARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $955,735 · HealthELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Health+5 more: $17,500 · HealthTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $25,500 · AnimalsNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesKIDS GIVE TO KIDS: $10,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$23,657,179Other$1,147,655Health$1,123,235Animals$25,500Arts & Culture$25,000Human Services$20,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PETER DEGEORGE CHARITABLE TRUST: $23,650,679 over 2y, 97% of budgetWARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $955,735 over 3y, 82% of budgetDEGEORGE ST TRAINING CENTER INC: $452,655 over 1y, 94% of budgetELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $25,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS GIVE TO KIDS: $10,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetTIPSY TURTLE FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetCROSSROADS CLUB INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Foundation For Palm Beach Health Network Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Peter Degeorge Ch…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Peter Degeorge Charitable TrustFL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peter Degeorge Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peter Degeorge Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peter Degeorge Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Peter Degeorge Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peter Degeorge Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home