Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peter C Kern Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$130kEducation$89kHealth$68kHuman Services$13kReligion$10kArts & Culture$8kRecreation & Sports$6kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,857
Median grant
2
States reached
$922k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Greyhound Adoption League$6,858
St Anastasia Church$6,858
Individual grant recipient$6,858
Alliance for Eating Disorder Awareness$6,857
Denton Animal Support Fd$6,857
Parents & Friends of Princeton FFA$4,857
Hardeman County 4H$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Graceway Village: $6k → 13%Graceway Village: $5k → 13%Graceway Village: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$256k · 11 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +118% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
13

Total granted

$256k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
-6%

Still filing today

45%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +118%
  • AA
    ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $40k · revenue +286%
  • DA
    DOGS AND CATS FOREVER
    3× · 2018–2022 · $18k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CP
    Canton Public Schools
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • HC
    Hareman County 4H
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • NV
    National Veterans Memorial & Museum
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Little Dog Rescue Group Inc

To rescue rehabilitate and rehome homeless and abandoned pets.

Animals
2
Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County Inc

None

Animals
3
Animal Nation Inc

Animal welfare organization providing rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption for wild, domestic, and farmed animals.

Animals
4
Love Them All

We specialize in saving the most at-risk and critical needs dogs facing unnecessary euthanasia in our local shelters. We provide every resource they need to ultimately become adoptable to their perfect forever home.

Animals
5
Animals in Distress

The organization is dedicated to the care and adoption of abandoned animals

Animals
6
Adopt-a-Dog Inc

To save, socialize and secure loving homes for unwanted or abandoned dogs.

Animals
7
Starfish Animal Rescue

To help abandoned dogs in kill shelters find permanent and responsible loving homes. We support and work with other reputable rescues who support our vision and standards.

Animals
8
The Animal Haven Inc

The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.

Animals
9
Humane Society of Genesee County

To provide services to homeless animals

Animals
10
Animal Defense League of Texas

The animal defense league of texas rescues homeless dogs, cats, puppies, and kittens, and provides medical treatment, nutrition, and shelter in a safe, live-release facility until they are matched with their forever families. through…

Animals
11
Delta Animal Shelter

Be the caring voice for animals in need.

Animals
12
Fort Defiance Humane Society

Animal sheltering

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaqua Animal Refuge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grace Way Village Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $43,828 · OtherIndividual grant recipientParents & Friends of Princeton FFA: $31,649 · OtherParents & Friends of Princeton FFAGreyhound Adoption League: $13,395 · OtherGreyhound Adoption LeagueLinda McNatt Animal Care Ctr: $12,571 · OtherLinda McNatt Animal Care CtrCanton Public Schools: $9,527 · OtherHareman County 4H: $8,523 · OtherST ANASTASIA CATHOLIC CHURCH: $8,395 · OtherNational Veterans Memorial & Museum: $8,389 · OtherMEA OLAS PLACE: $7,870 · OtherDenton Animal Support Fd: $6,857 · OtherNATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $6,200 · OtherPrinceton HS Athletic Booster: $6,200 · Other+6 more: $16,851 · Other+6 moreALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $39,960 · AnimalsALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INCDOGS AND CATS FOREVER: $18,211 · AnimalsDOGS AND CATS FOREVERCOLUMBUS HUMANE: $7,870 · AnimalsCOLUMBUS HUMANEDENTON ANIMAL SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC: $7,488 · AnimalsDENTON ANIMAL SUPPORT FOUND…GREYHOUND ADOPTION LEAGUE OF TEXAS: $6,200 · AnimalsGREYHOUND ADOPTION LEAGUE O…+1 more: $1,669 · AnimalsNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS INC: $59,556 · HealthNATIONAL ALLIANCE FO…GRACE WAY VILLAGE INC: $13,034 · Human Services
Other$180,255Animals$81,398Health$59,556Human Services$13,034

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS INC: $59,556 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $39,960 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDOGS AND CATS FOREVER: $18,211 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGRACE WAY VILLAGE INC: $13,034 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMEA OLAS PLACE: $7,870 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCOLUMBUS HUMANE: $7,870 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDENTON ANIMAL SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC: $7,488 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $6,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPCA INC: $1,669 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds DOGS AND CATS FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds GRACE WAY VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEA OLAS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds DENTON ANIMAL SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GREYHOUND ADOPTION LEAGUE OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds SPCA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA11× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peter C Kern Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peter C Kern Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Grace Way Village Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Dogs and Cats Forever: 1% of income from government
  • Spca Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peter C Kern Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph