Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peter and Carol Goldman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$490k
Granted FY2025still arriving
63
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$825kHealth$739kPhilanthropy$156kArts & Culture$100kRecreation & Sports$90kCivil Rights$47kFood & Nutrition$32kCrime & Legal$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k54 grants · $125k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $279k
$2,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULANE UNIVERSITY$105,000
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC$102,000
JUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION$72,335
GI RESEARCH FOUNDATION$25,164
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB$15,000
THE JOSSELYN CENTER$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CROHN'S AND COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$10,000
ROGER BALDWIN FOUNDATION OF ACLU$10,000
SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION$7,900
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC$6,200
RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION$5,045
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH$5,000
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE DENVER HOSPICE: $500 → 12%SHARE FOUNDATION: $100 → 15%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $1k → 14%TOTAL LINK TO COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INCORPORATED: $1k → 14%TOTAL LINK TO COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INCORPORATED: $500 → 14%TOTAL LINK TO COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INCORPORATED: $500 → 14%TOTAL LINK TO COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INCORPORATED: $500 → 14%TOTAL LINK TO COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC: $250 → 14%ASSOCIATION OF HORIZON: $500 → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $1k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $1k → 14%SHARE OUR SPACE: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
MD
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 69 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

69 repeat relationships: 53 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
40

Total granted

$2.2M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+26%

Still filing today

65%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $800k · revenue +44%
  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    6× · 2020–2025 · $330k · revenue +27%
  • TJ
    THE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +596%

Funded once

  • A
    ACLU
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • LS
    LYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +23%
  • HP
    HYDE PARK DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
4
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
5
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
6
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
9
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Lake Michigan Sail Racing Federation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/77
Grantees still filing
59/77
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $800,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCAT…+8 more: $24,490 · EducationJGASF: $272,778 · OtherJGASFGI RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $85,164 · OtherGI RESEARCH FOUNDATIONAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $32,000 · OtherGIRF: $31,400 · OtherILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $24,020 · Other+69 more: $259,836 · Other+69 moreRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $330,000 · HealthRehabilitation Institute o…THE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP: $65,000 · HealthTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFPCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $63,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATI…NATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC: $32,600 · HealthNATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUND…Endeavor Health Clinical Operations: $27,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $23,250 · Health+10 more: $24,870 · HealthDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $102,000 · PhilanthropyHighland Park Community Foundation: $14,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $12,100 · PhilanthropyMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $6,700 · Philanthropy+2 more: $275 · PhilanthropyJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION: $72,335 · Recreation & Sports+5 more: $3,112 · Recreation & SportsRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $24,645 · Arts & CultureURBAN GATEWAYS: $15,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INC: $6,500 · Arts & CultureMarwen Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureWriters Theatre Inc: $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $16,500 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $14,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $100 · Food & Nutrition
Education$824,490Other$705,198Health$566,220Philanthropy$135,075Recreation & Sports$75,447Arts & Culture$57,645Food & Nutrition$31,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $800,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $330,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $102,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP: $65,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $63,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC: $32,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $32,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $27,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $24,645 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $23,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROGER BALDWIN FOUNDATION OF ACLU INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN GATEWAYS: $15,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES: $14,650 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $14,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHighland Park Community Foundation: $14,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $12,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $9,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDON INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $6,700 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $6,575 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUM: $6,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $5,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMarwen Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP THUNDERBIRD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDIGESTIVE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4,100 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOTALLINK TO COMMUNITY INC: $2,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCamp for All Kids: $2,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $2,036 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWriters Theatre Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPCD KS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN ROADS ACADEMY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK: $1,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $1,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL SPORT CENTER FOR THE DISABLED: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGING WORLDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROGER BALDWIN FOUNDATION OF ACLU INC ↗
  • Who funds BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds URBAN GATEWAYS ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Highland Park Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds BUILDON INC ↗
  • Who funds Michael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL33.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Circle of Service Foundation · Kovler Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Stone Barrett Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Bluhm Family Foundation · Dr Scholl Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peter and Carol Goldman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peter and Carol Goldman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peter and Carol Goldman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Peter and Carol Goldman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peter and Carol Goldman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph