· Private foundation
Perryman Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $83k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION | $28,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA | $25,300 |
| RETURN TO DIRT | $10,000 |
| ST BRENDAN CHURCH | $10,000 |
| YMCA | $10,000 |
| ST BRENDAN SCHOOL | $6,000 |
| FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S ACADEMY ON THE HALIFAX | $4,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA | $4,000 |
| BILLFISH FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION | $2,650 |
| FR LOPEZ CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| COASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION | $2,300 |
| ROBERT L VOGES MEMORIAL FUND | $2,100 |
| EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNI | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
40 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IGINTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $133k · revenue +48%
- SHSMA HEALTHCARE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $53k · revenue +95%
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S ACADEMY ON THE HALIFAX8× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- BMBLUEWATER MOVEMENTS KEY RESTORATIOone grant, 2018 · $4k
- AHADVENT HEALTH OF DAYTONA BEACHone grant, 2019 · $3k
- AHASPEN HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to change the lives of our youth through enviromental stewardship by providing inspiration and education thorugh recreation.
To inspire environmental stewardship of florida's coastal ecosystems through education, research and advocacy.
Florida wildlife hospital & santuary, inc is a non-profit organization dedicated to helping florida wildlife and migratory birds with the mission of returning them to their place in the environment.
The mission of the marine resources council (mrc) is to maintain and enhance the quality of marine systems for the economic, recreational, aesthetic, and environmental use for the people of florida
Dedicated to the conservation and preservation of the waters in and around south florida through wise fishery & watermanagement practices, while recognizing the importance of sport fishing to the local economy and the cultural heritage of…
For charitable and scientific purposes dedicated to educating others about and preserving our coastal resources including the local habitats and wildlife.
To inspire and advance manatee conservation by partnering cooperatively in manatee rescue, rehabilitation, release, and monitoring efforts; improve understanding of manatee biology and health through scientific research; and promote…
The Florida Bulldog Rescue (FBR) is a volunteer group whose mission is to rehab and re-home neglected, abused and unwanted bulldogs throughout the state of Florida as well as providing a safe alternative to shelters.
The south florida wildlife centers mission is protecting wildlife through rescue, rehabilitation, release, and education. the sfwc has been the trusted resource for wildlife in the tri-county region of miami-dade, broward, and palm beach,…
Charitable or educational purposes related to services for persons experiencing homelessness and persons at risk of homelessness in the service area. in pursuance of the foregoing purposes, vfcch shall facilitate and coordinate the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Futures Inc and the most unlike its peers is Great Dawg Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SMA HEALTHCARE INC ↗
- Who funds Return to Dirt ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ACADEMY ON THE HALIFAX ↗
- Who funds THE BILLFISH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF DAYTONA BEACH INC ↗
- Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF ORMOND BEACH INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RENEW COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds HALIFAX HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MOTORSPORTS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds PROVISION PACKS INC ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE COMMUNITY OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds FUTURES INC ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DARCY AKERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Paul B Hunter & Constance D Hunter Charitable Foundation Inc · Jeep Beach Inc · United Way of Volusia-Flagler Counties Inc · Simpkins Family Foundation Inc · Earl W & Patricia B Colvard Charitable Foundation · Lil & Yorke Doliner Charitable Fndtn Inc · Root Family Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Perryman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Neighborhood Center of West Volusia Inc — 27% of income from government
- Sma Healthcare Inc — 8% of income from government
- International Game Fish Association Inc — 2% of income from government
- Halifax Humane Society Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Perryman Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Perryman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.