Skip to content

· Private foundation

Perlow Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$149k
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$698kReligion$561kArts & Culture$240kYouth Development$203kEducation$112kRecreation & Sports$76kCivil Rights$33kHuman Services$17kOther$0
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k12 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $111k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$40,000
Individual grant recipient$18,000
VIA ART FUND INC$15,000
KOLLEL$13,500
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$12,000
COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL$12,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$9,152
SHAARE TORAH CONGREGATION$5,000
ART 21$5,000
MOVING TRADITIONS$5,000
APERTURE FOUNDATION$3,500
ALEPH INSTITUTE$2,000
PADRES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES$1,800
PROJECT KESHER$1,800
HADAR INSTITUTE$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AUBERLE: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
MD
AZ
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 39 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2023, 23 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
18

Total granted

$1.3M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+46%

Still filing today

31%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationHealthReligionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MOVING TRADITIONS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $107k · revenue +30%
  • CD
    COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2023 · $84k · revenue +31%
  • VA
    VIA ART FUND INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $60k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • NR
    NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +61%
  • AF
    American Friends of Migdal OHR
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -25%
  • JR
    JEWISH RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
3
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
4
Hillel Jewish University Center

To enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—
5
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
6
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
7
The Jewish Publication Society

Our mission has always been to enhance jewish literacy through the publication of great books.

—
8
Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc

Artis is an independent nonprofit organization that supports contemporary artists from israel whose work addresses aesthetic, social and political questions to inspire reflection and debate. www.artis.art

Arts & Culture
9
Association for Public Art

The association for public art (apa, formerly the fairmount park art association) commissions, preserves, interprets and promotes public art in philadelphia. dedicated to creating a museum without walls that informs, engages and inspires…

Arts & Culture
10
Philadelphia Contemporary

We connect the people and places of philadelphia through art and partnership. the organization is a free-standing platform that endeavors to show forward-thinking, high-quality contemporary visual and performance art in the city. the…

Human Services
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Her Justice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chatham University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
20/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOLLEL: $410,876 · OtherKOLLELTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $95,665 · OtherTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLECOMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $84,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY DAY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $66,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAMP RAMAH: $51,000 · OtherSHAARE TORAH CONGREGATION: $47,100 · OtherCARNEGIE MUSUEM OF ART: $39,635 · OtherUJA FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK: $39,000 · Other+34 more: $216,121 · Other+34 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $659,424 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBU…+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyVIA ART FUND INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureVIA ART FU…ARTISTS IMAGE RESOURCE INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureARTISTS IM…ART21 INC: $34,750 · Arts & CultureART21 INCAPERTURE FOUNDATION INC: $30,025 · Arts & CultureAPERTURE F…+3 more: $3,500 · Arts & CultureMOVING TRADITIONS: $107,000 · ReligionSTANLEY M MARKS BLOOD CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $15,000 · HealthJEWISH RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC: $3,333 · HealthEducation Law Center - PA: $4,500 · EducationASPIRE ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationHER JUSTICE INC: $1,000 · EducationCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $3,600 · Youth Development
Other$1,049,897Philanthropy$661,424Arts & Culture$183,275Religion$107,000Health$18,333Education$7,500Youth Development$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $659,424 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMOVING TRADITIONS: $107,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $84,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetVIA ART FUND INC: $60,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetARTISTS IMAGE RESOURCE INC: $55,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetART21 INC: $34,750 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAPERTURE FOUNDATION INC: $30,025 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetProject Kesher: $16,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSTANLEY M MARKS BLOOD CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $15,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC: $3,333 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN NEW YORK SECTION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPENCIL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUBERLE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrimary Stages Company Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHousing Plus Solutions Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds MOVING TRADITIONS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds VIA ART FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS IMAGE RESOURCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ART21 INC ↗
  • Who funds APERTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Kesher ↗
  • Who funds STANLEY M MARKS BLOOD CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
  • Who funds Education Law Center - PA ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Migdal OHR ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN NEW YORK SECTION ↗
  • Who funds PENCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY22.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Morris Charles M Tr Ua-Char · Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Herman & Helen Lipsitz Charitable Trust · David S Shapira Foundation · The Fine Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Perlow Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Perlow Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Perlow Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph