Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Perks Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$136k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$381kRecreation & Sports$200kCommunity Improvement$100kHuman Services$86kEducation$85kPhilanthropy$28kFood & Nutrition$10kYouth Development$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $136k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rockford Park District Foundation$136,000
FARMLINK PROJECT$5,000
ORANGE COUNTY UNITED WAY$3,000
YERKES FUTURE FOUNDATION INC$3,000
San Angelo Stock Show & Rodeo Syndicate$2,000
West Texas Boys Ranch 10223 Boys Ranch Rd$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FARMLINK PROJECT: $5k → 14%FARMLINK PROJECT: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$857k · 8 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$857k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+13%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’22’23’24
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RP
    ROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $366k · revenue +24%
  • RU
    ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2023 · $85k · revenue +5%
  • YF
    YERKES FUTURE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +149%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -23%
  • GL
    GENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +203%
  • CL
    CARRIE LYNN CHILDREN'S CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rockford Promise

Vision statement: enhance economic vitality in the rockford region by providing access to post-secondary education for all rockford public school graduates. - mission statement: remove financial barriers by offering full-tuition…

Education
2
The Rockford Institute

To provide analysis and commentary on cultural, economic, political, and educational issues through a published monthly opinion magazine and to operate continuing adult educational conferences in american and european literature and…

3
Rockford Community Investment Fund

To support housing and community development ventures

Community Improvement
4
The Workforce Connection Inc

The mission of the workforce connection board is to create a competitive, skilled and educated workforce by providing a system for individuals to gain meaningful employment responsive to the needs of business.

Employment
5
Rockford Area Strategic Initiatives

The primary role of the rockford area strategic initiative is to enhance education, commerce, trade and economic development in the rockford region

Community Improvement
6
Rockford Woodlawn Fund Inc
Recreation & Sports
7
Rockford Area Community Endowment

Rockford area community endowment is a local foundation committed to assisting rockford area residents, businesses, government and volunteer organizations to expand opportunities locally. race was founded in 1964.

Philanthropy
8
Rockford Christian Education Association

To challenge young people to know christ as lord, apply god's truth in all areas of life, love others sacrifically, and achieve the highest level of knowledge and skill in order to serve god and others

Education
9
Rockford Area Economic Development Council Inc

The rockford area economic development council cultivates opportunities for primary job growth that increase the economic well-being of our region

10
Rockford Day Nursery

It is the mission of this corporation to provide quality care for children between the ages of six weeks and twelve years whose parents are employed or in training.

Human Services
11
United Rocks
12
Rockford Sharefest

Rockford sharefest exists to identify, develop and lead projects that empower and release volunteers and donors to use their god-given gifts, abilities and resources to make an impact for the common good. rockford sharefest is bringing…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockford University and the most unlike its peers is Transform Rockford. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $366,000 · EnvironmentROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION+2 more — $15,000 · EnvironmentROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT — $180,000 · OtherROCKFORD PARK DISTRICTInternational Women's Baseball Center — $100,000 · OtherInternational Women's Baseball Cent…+1 more — $1,000 · OtherTRANSFORM ROCKFORD — $100,000 · Community ImprovementTRANSFORM ROC…CARRIE LYNN CHILDREN'S CENTER — $6,000 · Community ImprovementCARRIE LYNN C…ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY — $85,000 · EducationROCKFORD UN…YERKES FUTURE FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · EducationYERKES FUTU…UNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY — $20,000 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNTY'S UNITED WAY — $8,000 · PhilanthropyFARMLINK PROJECT — $10,000 · Human ServicesSAN ANGELO STOCK SHOW & RODEO SYNDICATE — $8,000 · Youth Development
Environment$381,000Other$281,000Community Improvement$106,000Education$93,000Philanthropy$28,000Human Services$10,000Youth Development$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $366,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetTRANSFORM ROCKFORD — $100,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetROCKFORD UNIVERSITY — $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFARMLINK PROJECT — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYERKES FUTURE FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAN ANGELO STOCK SHOW & RODEO SYNDICATE — $8,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetORANGE COUNTY'S UNITED WAY — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARRIE LYNN CHILDREN'S CENTER — $6,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetCOTTONWOOD INSTITUTE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO15.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Perks Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Perks Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Perks Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph