Skip to content

· Private foundation

Perilstein Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$18kReligion$11kEducation$10kHuman Services$6kFood & Nutrition$2kRecreation & Sports$2kArts & Culture$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
3
States reached
$132k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Einstein Hospital$5,000
Kol Torah$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,200
Jewish Relief Agency$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
The Center for Contemporary Mussar$750
Boys Town Jerusalem Foundation of A$500
Living Beyond Breast Cancer$360
Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Ind$360
Friends of United Hatzalah$360
National Multiple Sclerosis Societ$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Federation Early Learning Service: $1k → 22%Federation Early Learning Service: $750 → 22%Jewish Relief Agency: $1k → 7%Jewish Relief Agency: $1k → 7%Jewish Relief Agency: $500 → 7%Cradles to Crayons: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 12 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
13

Total granted

$40k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+44%

Still filing today

42%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    Einstein Hospital
    6× · 2020–2025 · $17k
  • YK
    YESHIVA KETANA OF PHILADELPHIA
    2× · 2021–2022 · $5k · revenue +367%
  • PC
    PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY KOLLEL
    3× · 2020–2024 · $3k

Funded once

  • JF
    Jewish Federation of Greater Phila
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k
  • PC
    Pinemere Camping Assoc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k
  • PH
    Penn Hillel
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gan Israel Chabad Inc

Operation of summer day camp and overnight camp which combines activities with a Torah education

Recreation & Sports
2
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
5
Young Judaea Global Inc

Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.

Education
6
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
7
Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinical School Ltd (Formerly the Meorot Inst)

To train rabbis, educators, and leaders who embody this vision in their teaching of torah, their spiritual support of individuals, and their building of diverse and welcoming communities; to foster and strengthen a network of rabbis and…

Education
8
Hitmasrut Inc

Jewish educational programs

Religion
9
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
10
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
11
Keren L'torah

Keren l'torah will promote jewish education in the greater detroit jewish community through classes, lectures, and distribution of written and audio materials. all educational opportunities by the corporation will be either free or at a…

Religion
12
Kerem Bais Yaakov Seminary Inc

Kerem bais yaakov seminary is a religious institution with traditional values dedicated to advancing students in classical torah studies while establishing a torah outlook that students can apply to daily life. the curriculum enhances…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Relief Agency; the most unlike its peers is Joshua M Katz Memorial Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Einstein Hospital: $16,750 · OtherEinstein HospitalPHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY KOLLEL: $3,000 · OtherPHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY KOLLELIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBoys Town Jerusalem Foundation of A: $2,500 · OtherBoys Town Jerusalem Foundation of AJewish Federation of Greater Phila: $1,750 · OtherPinemere Camping Assoc: $1,750 · OtherKol Torah: $1,500 · OtherPenn Hillel: $1,500 · Other+11 more: $7,790 · Other+11 moreYESHIVA KETANA OF PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 · EducationYESHIVA KET…Joshua M Katz Memorial Fund: $250 · EducationJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $2,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH RELI…FEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $1,750 · Human ServicesFEDERATION …CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO …CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY MUSSAR INC: $2,250 · ReligionJewish Heritage Programs: $250 · ReligionFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,360 · Arts & CultureLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER: $360 · Health
Other$39,040Education$5,250Human Services$5,250Religion$2,500Arts & Culture$1,360Health$360

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVA KETANA OF PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY MUSSAR INC: $2,250 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetFEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINEMERE CAMP ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJoshua M Katz Memorial Fund: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Heritage Programs: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVA KETANA OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY MUSSAR INC ↗
  • Who funds FEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds PINEMERE CAMP ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER ↗
  • Who funds Joshua M Katz Memorial Fund ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Heritage Programs ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Saramar Charitable FundPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Saramar Charitable Fund · Erlbaum Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Perilstein Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Perilstein Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Perilstein Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Perilstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Perilstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph