Skip to content

· Private foundation

People Inspired Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$118kHuman Services$91kHealth$60kReligion$45kYouth Development$36kRecreation & Sports$29kHousing & Shelter$23kInternational$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COME AND SEE FOUNDATION$95,000
Individual grant recipient$14,317
NO LONGER FATHERLESS INC$11,200
PLEASANT GROVE MISSIONARY BAPTIST$6,300
CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION$6,000
BARNABAS MINISTRIES OF CTL FL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,533
THE FINLEY PROJECT$3,800
SMYRNA CARES$3,500
SSM HEALTH CARDINAL GLEN CHILDREN H$2,500
NINE 12$2,500
TUNNELL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT$2,000
SE VOLUSIA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,810
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREAT WALL CHINA ADOPTION: $500 → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%SMYRNA CARES: $35k → 12%THE FINLEY PROJECT: $4k → 13%SMYRNA CARES: $4k → 12%NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF W VOLUSIA: $11k → 12%NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF W VOLUSIA: $6k → 12%THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF W VOLUS: $3k → 12%THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF W VOLUS: $3k → 12%THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF W VOLUS: $3k → 12%NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF W VOLUSIA: $3k → 12%THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF W VOLUS: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IA
MO
KY
KS
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$520k · 28 repeat orgs$301k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
34

Total granted

$520k
$175k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+98%

Still filing today

46%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NL
    No Longer Fatherless Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $31k · revenue +143%
  • NC
    NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF WEST VOLUSIA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +92%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +392%

Funded once

  • BM
    BISHOP MOORE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pediatric Oncology Support Team Inc

The mission of post is to help local children and their families courageously fight cancer by giving them compassionate emotional and financial support. post's multidisciplinary team of dedicated, caring professionals provide free,…

Health
2
Wipe Out Kids' Cancer Inc

Wipe out kids cancer offers comfort and hope to kids with cancer through support programs serving the entire family and funds innovative research leading to new discoveries and treatments in the fight against pediatric cancer. "support and…

—
3
Jessica June Children's Cancer Foundation Inc

The mission of jessica june children's cancer foundation (the "organization") is to help children and their families fight cancer by providing emergency financial assistance for basic human necessities and supportive care services.…

Health
4
Chase the Victory Corporation

Our mission is to strengthen the support of families grieving the loss of a child, fighting childhood cancer, and inspire hope and kindness.

Human Services
5
Orlando Health Inc

Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
6
Kids Beating Cancer Inc

Organization - kids beating cancer, inc., (kbc) is a nonprofit, nonstock florida corporation formed in 1992. kbc provides access to life-saving treatments through the science of cellular therapy and advancing pediatric innovative, novel,…

Human Services
7
Sacred Heart Foundation Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-center, holistic care which…

Health
8
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
9
Super Heroes With Super Kids
Philanthropy
10
Orlando Health Foundation Inc

The mission of the orlando health foundation is to support the strategic priorities of orlando health through philanthropy. this is accomplished through special events and annual major and planned gift fundraising efforts.

Health
11
Chasin a Dream Foundation Inc

To provide individualized, life changing assistance to families with children battling cancer, cystic fibrosis, and other life threatening illnesses.

Human Services
12
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Southwest Florida Inc

The mission of ronald mcdonald house charities of southwest florida is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Center of West Volusia Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pay It 4WARD Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NINE 12: $105,000 · OtherNINE 12BISHOP MOORE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $100,000 · OtherBISHOP MOORE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLCOME AND SEE FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 · OtherCOME AND SEE FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $83,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLEASANT GROVE MISSIONARY BAPTIST: $26,650 · Other+53 more: $197,797 · Other+53 moreSMYRNA CARES CORPORATION: $38,500 · Human ServicesSMYRNA CAR…NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF WEST VOLUSIA INC: $28,500 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHO…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,750 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WA…THE FINLEY PROJECT INC: $3,800 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesCHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $30,800 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,500 · HealthThe Donna Foundation Inc: $2,000 · HealthOceans of Hope FoundationInc: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthNo Longer Fatherless Inc: $31,200 · Youth DevelopmentDELAND POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentRED & BLACK SPORTS CLUB INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsPAY IT 4WARD CORPORATION: $14,125 · Community ImprovementSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $13,000 · EducationBETHEL COLLEGE: $600 · Education
Other$607,947Human Services$78,050Health$47,300Youth Development$34,700Recreation & Sports$25,000Community Improvement$14,125Education$13,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSMYRNA CARES CORPORATION: $38,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetNo Longer Fatherless Inc: $31,200 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetCHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $30,800 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF WEST VOLUSIA INC: $28,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetRED & BLACK SPORTS CLUB INC: $25,000 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIS SERVANTS MINISTRIES INC: $7,500 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FINLEY PROJECT INC: $3,800 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDELAND POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $3,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Donna Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOceans of Hope FoundationInc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJUNIOR SERVICE LEAGUE OF DELAND INC: $1,250 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetME STRONG INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBETHEL COLLEGE: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SMYRNA CARES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds No Longer Fatherless Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF WEST VOLUSIA INC ↗
  • Who funds RED & BLACK SPORTS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds PAY IT 4WARD CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HIS SERVANTS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FINLEY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DELAND POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Earl W & Patricia B Colvard Charitable FoundationFL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Earl W & Patricia B Colvard Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization People Inspired Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from People Inspired Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Neighborhood Center of West Volusia Inc: 27% of income from government
  • No Longer Fatherless Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on People Inspired’s filings →

More from the funding graph