Skip to content
Pennsylvania Academy of Family Physicians Foundation at a glance

· Public charity

Pennsylvania Academy of Family Physicians Foundation

The PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS FOUNDATION (foundation), along with the pennsylvania academy of family physicians (academy), will support its members through advocacy and education to ensure physician-coordinated, personalized, and comprehensive quality health care for every pennsylvanian.

$174k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$290kEducation$17k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $152,966, the rows itemized in this filing. The $174,335 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,369 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $124k
$12,475
Median grant
2
States reached
$661k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARGARET FOUNDATION$12,500
CONNEMAUGH FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCY 1889 FOUNDATION INC$12,500
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$12,500
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL$12,487
JEFFERSON ABINGTON HOSPITAL$12,487
EXCELA HEALTH LATROBE HOSPITAL$12,486
ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PENNSYLVANIA$12,475
CHESTNUT HILL CLINIC COMPANY$12,458
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$12,160
GEISINGER CLINIC$11,927
INDIANA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$9,011
AHN RESEARCH INSTITUTE$7,275
WELLSPAN GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL$6,700
FAMILY MEDICINE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CONNEMAUGH FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCY 1889 FOUNDATION INC: $13k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$101k · 4 repeat orgs$194k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$101k
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    INDIANA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $34k · revenue +26%
  • SL
    ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $32k · revenue +26%
  • LG
    LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $24k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • U
    UPMC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • U
    UPMC
    one grant, 2023 · $21k
  • U
    UPMC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
2
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
3
Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals Inc

Thomas jefferson university hospitals, inc. ("tjuh") is dedicated to improving the health of the communities we serve. we are committed to: 1) setting the standard for excellence in the delivery of patient care, patient safety and the…

Health
4
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
5
Jefferson Health - Northeast

To provide exceptional patient care and customer service to members of the communities served by the hospitals, and to recognize a patient's right to considerate and respectful care, regardless of ability to pay. please refer to schedule o…

Health
6
Lansdale Hospital

The organization is dedicated to improving the quality of life for all by fostering healing, easing suffering, and promoting wellness in a culture of safety, learning and respect. please refer to schedule o for the organization's community…

Health
7
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
8
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
9
Kennedy University Hospital Inc

To function as an academic medical center that provides the finest healthcare services with excellent outcomes to people living in our communities. please refer to schedule o for the organization's community benefit statement.

Health
10
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
11
St Luke's Health Network Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide compassionate, excellent quality and cost effective healthcare to the residents of the communities we serve regardless of race, color, creed, sex, national origin or ability to pay. the…

Health
12
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network Group Letter Ruling

Aehn group is licensed to operate 721 acute care beds. tertiary care is provided through three locations, its main campus in north philadelphia, its campus at montgomery county and at elkins park (until june 30, 2023). in addition, its…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster General Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Family Medicine Education Consortium. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDIANA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $33,558 · HealthINDIANA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA: $32,050 · HealthST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PALANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL: $24,175 · HealthLANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITALST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $12,500 · HealthST MARGARET FOUNDATIONCHH Community Health: $12,458 · HealthCHH Community HealthGEISINGER CLINIC: $11,927 · HealthGEISINGER CLINICCARBON-SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $11,051 · HealthCARBON-SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INCABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $9,173 · HealthABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITALTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF LEBANON PENNSYLVANIA: $6,700 · HealthUPMC: $24,984 · OtherUPMCUPMC: $21,479 · OtherUPMCUPMC: $19,519 · OtherUPMCJEFFERSON ABINGTON HOSPITAL: $12,487 · OtherJEFFERSON ABINGTON HOSPITALEXCELA HEALTH: $12,486 · OtherEXCELA HEALTHFAMILY MEDICINE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM: $11,000 · OtherFAMILY MEDICINE EDUCATION CONSORTIUMALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $7,457 · OtherALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORKHIGHMARK HEALTH: $7,275 · OtherHIGHMARK HEALTHTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $12,500 · EducationTRUSTEES …THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $12,160 · EducationTHOMAS JE…1889 FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · Human Services
Health$153,592Other$116,687Education$24,660Human Services$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDIANA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $33,558 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA: $32,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL: $24,175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget1889 FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHH Community Health: $12,458 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $12,160 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEISINGER CLINIC: $11,927 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARBON-SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $11,051 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY MEDICINE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM: $11,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $9,173 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF LEBANON PENNSYLVANIA: $6,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA5.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pennsylvania Academy of Family Physicians Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pennsylvania Academy of Family Physicians Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pennsylvania Academy of Family Physicians Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pennsylvania Academy of Family Physicians Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pennsylvania Academy of Family Physicians’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home