Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pendleton Sara J Char Tr-Main

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$640k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$2.4MPhilanthropy$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$10.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPALDING UNIVERSITY$15,000
MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY$15,000
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY$15,000
MIDWAY UNIVERSITY$15,000
SPALDING UNIVERSITY$15,000
SPALDING UNIVERSITY$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE$15,000
APPALACHIAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY$15,000
LINDSEY WILSON COLLEGE$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE$15,000
EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY$15,000
MIDWAY UNIVERSITY$15,000
SPALDING UNIVERSITY$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE$15,000
SPALDING UNIVERSITY$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNIVERISTY OF TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF PHARM: $10k → 14%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY: $15k → 19%APPALACHIAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY: $15k → 27%MIDWAY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 10%ELIZABETHTOWN COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLL: $10k → 13%OWENSBORO COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 13%GALEN COLLEGE OF NURSING: $15k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%SOUTHCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECH: $10k → 17%SOUTHCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECHNI: $10k → 18%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 19%LINDSEY WILSON COLLEGE: $15k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SOUTHEAST KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL: $10k → 27%HAZARD COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 27%MIDWAY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 10%OWENSBORO COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $150k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%SOUTHCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECH: $10k → 17%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%MIDWAY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 10%BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%EASTERN KENTYCKY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $10k → 25%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$948k · 12 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$948k
$358k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+13%

Still filing today

42%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $302k · revenue +8%
  • SU
    SPALDING UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $220k · revenue -15%
  • MS
    MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $85k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +13%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PHILANTHROPY
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
3
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
4
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
5
Linfield University

Linfield university advances a vision of learning, life, and community that promotes intellectual challenge and creativity, values both theoretical and practical knowledge, engages thoughtful dialogue in a climate of mutual respect and…

Education
6
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
7
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
8
Lindenwood Education System

Real experience. real success.enhancing lives through quality education and professional preparatory experiences. see schedule o.values:we put our students first. we have an unwavering commitment to providing the highest quality education,…

Education
9
Bradley University

Bradley university empowers students for immediate and sustained success in their personal and professional endeavors by combining professional preparation, liberal arts and sciences, and co-curricular experiences. alongside our dedication…

Education
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campbellsville University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Appalachian College of Pharmacy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $302,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLESPALDING UNIVERSITY INC: $220,000 · EducationSPALDING UNIVERSITY INCUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $150,436 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INCMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $69,000 · EducationMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE+4 more: $69,000 · Education+4 moreUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PHILANTHROPY: $150,436 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PHILANTHROPYMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $85,000 · OtherMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITYSOUTHCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECH: $68,000 · OtherSOUTHCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECHEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITYNORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · OtherNORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITYMARSHALL UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · OtherMARSHALL UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $30,000 · Other+12 more: $147,000 · Other+12 more
Education$810,436Other$605,436

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $302,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPALDING UNIVERSITY INC: $220,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $150,436 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $69,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINDSEY WILSON UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCampbellsville University Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds SPALDING UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ↗
  • Who funds BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LINDSEY WILSON UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Campbellsville University Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John B & Brownie Young Memorial FundKY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John B & Brownie Young Memorial Fund · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Raymond & Mary D Barnett Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Woldenberg Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pendleton Sara J Char Tr-Main funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pendleton Sara J Char Tr-Main. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pendleton Sara J Char Tr-Main’s filings →

    More from the funding graph