· Private foundation
Peloton Foundation Inc
DONATES MONEY TO PROMISING NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $13k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THAYER ACADEMY | $50,000 |
| CRADLES TO CRAYONS | $2,500 |
| PROJECT SUNSHINE | $2,500 |
| BRAZIL FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| FOOD FOR THOUGHT DENVER | $1,503 |
| AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| UNITED WAY SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA | $1,000 |
| COALITION FOR A BETTER ACRE | $500 |
| ANDREW MCDONOUGH B POSITIVE FOUNDATION | $500 |
| OASIS FOR ORPHANS | $450 |
| ABNER GIBBS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | $250 |
| ADVANCING CTNNB1 CURES AND TREATMENTS INC | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CTCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +141%
- CSCHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY INC2× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +20%
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue +34%
Funded once
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFone grant, 2022 · $29k · revenue -21%- FMFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INCone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +12%
- PPLAYWORKSone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
Children's services
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
To provide educational and therapeutic services, at a professional level, for infants, toddlers and preschool children up to 12 years and their families through supporting the family unit and working with each child to develop his or her…
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
Crossnore communities for children champions the well being of children and families by fostering innovative change that weaves a fabric of resilience in homes, schools, and communities.
Children's foundation of america (the foundation) is a not-for-profit organization established to raise funds and provide support to children in need. the primary goal of the foundation is to identify and access resources to support foster…
To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
The Organization operates exclusively for the benefit of the charitable purposes of Boston Children's Hospital (the Hospital) and the affiliated Foundations. It works jointly with the Hospital and the Foundations in developing and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Precious Child Inc and the most unlike its peers is Academic Arts High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THAYER ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds ROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
- Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP ↗
- Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SUNSHINE INC ↗
- Who funds Horizons for Youth ↗
- Who funds BRAZIL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds Food For Thought Denver ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds EO COMPANIES ↗
- Who funds DENVER CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds OASIS FOR ORPHANS ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR A BETTER ACRE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEATHER ABBOTT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Academic Arts High School ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds CTNNB1 Connect and Cure Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Peloton Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Children's Services of Roxbury Inc — 35% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Peloton Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Peloton Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.