Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peculiar Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$401k
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$624kHuman Services$292kFood & Nutrition$254kRecreation & Sports$248kHealth$201kReligion$126kYouth Development$54kCommunity Improvement$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $152k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $249k
$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAYMORE PECULIAR SCHOOL DISTRICT$41,500
ARCHIE CASS SCHOOL DISTRICT$31,500
LIONS CLUB OF PECULIAR$30,000
CASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION$30,000
CARING HEARTS OF PECULIAR$27,500
Individual grant recipient$25,000
HEART N HAND$17,500
HARVESTERSCOMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK$15,000
BELTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HOPE HAVEN OF CASS COUNTY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,454
PLEASANT HILL LAY CLERGY$9,000
WEST CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$8,000
CASS COUNTY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RAYMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%HOPE HAVEN OF CASS COUNTY: $10k → 8%HOPE HAVEN OF CASS COUNTY: $10k → 8%HOPE HAVEN OF CASS COUNTY: $9k → 8%HOPE HAVEN OF CASS COUNTY: $5k → 8%HOPE HAVEN OF CASS COUNTY: $5k → 8%HOPE HAVEN OF CASS COUNTY: $4k → 8%HARRISONVILLE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $3k → 8%HARRISONVILLE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $3k → 8%HARRISONVILLE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $2k → 8%HARRISONVILLE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $2k → 8%HARRISONVILLE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $2k → 8%HARRISONVILLE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

SD
IA
PA
MO
AZ
KS
AR
NC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 96 repeat orgs$364k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

96 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 56 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

96
82

Total granted

$2.0M
$313k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+3%

Still filing today

30%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $135k · revenue +10%
  • CC
    CASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2025 · $103k · revenue +142%
  • RP
    RAYMORE-PECULIAR PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2025 · $41k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • KS
    KS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • GJ
    GREATER JOBS OF KANSAS CITY
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • CM
    CASS MIDWAY R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT PTO
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
4
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
5
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
8
Park University

Park university's mission is to transform lives through accessible, student-centered, quality higher education.

Education
9
Bradley University

Bradley university empowers students for immediate and sustained success in their personal and professional endeavors by combining professional preparation, liberal arts and sciences, and co-curricular experiences. alongside our dedication…

Education
10
Central Christian College of Kansas

Central christian college of kansas is a four-year, non-profit liberal arts college with the primary mission of offering a christ-centered education for character.

Education
11
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
12
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cass Regional Medical Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pleasant Hill Cares. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 190 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
30/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $214,214 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCARING HEARTS OF PECULIAR INC: $162,500 · OtherCARING HEARTS OF PECULIAR INCUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA: $79,000 · OtherRAYMORE PECULIAR SCHOOL DISTRICT: $76,853 · Other+156 more: $1,319,916 · Other+156 moreRAYMORE-PECULIAR PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $41,250 · EducationBELTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $27,500 · EducationROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $19,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $9,000 · EducationCENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $9,000 · EducationWILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · Education+15 more: $45,000 · EducationHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $135,000 · Food & NutritionCASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $103,000 · HealthHOPE HAVEN OF CASS COUNTY: $43,000 · Human ServicesHARRISONVILLE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $28,000 · Human ServicesRAYMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF CASS COUNTY INC: $37,500 · Youth DevelopmentHEART-N-HAND MINISTRIES: $31,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentPLEASANT HILL CARES: $15,500 · Public Benefit
Other$1,852,483Education$156,750Food & Nutrition$135,000Health$103,000Human Services$79,500Youth Development$71,000Public Benefit$15,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $135,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $103,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetHOPE HAVEN OF CASS COUNTY: $43,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetRAYMORE-PECULIAR PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $41,250 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetWEST CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $38,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF CASS COUNTY INC: $37,500 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetHEART-N-HAND MINISTRIES: $31,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetHARRISONVILLE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $28,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetBELTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCASS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetCASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $21,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLEASANT HILL CARES: $15,500 over 6y, 55% of budgetHELP OF RAYMORE INC: $15,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetHARRISONVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetRaymore Historical Society: $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetMISSOURI HUNTING HERITAGE FEDERATION INC: $6,500 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetWILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFor the Children Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMetropolitan Community College Foundation: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVILA UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURES HARRISONVILLE: $3,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetSimpson College: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUND FARM HOLDINGS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASS COUNTY ELKS LODGE NO 2791: $3,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetWARTBURG COLLEGE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dallas: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEvangel University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWAY YOUTH SUPPORT ORGANIZATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HAVEN OF CASS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds RAYMORE-PECULIAR PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF CASS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART-N-HAND MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HARRISONVILLE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds BELTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Truman Heartland Community FoundationMO23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Truman Heartland Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Missouri Colleges Fund Inc · Terry & Susie Reardon Family Foundation · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Virginia Thomas Charitable Trust · T Michal Flottman Scholarship Trust · Jack J Isgur Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peculiar Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peculiar Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peculiar Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Peculiar Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 190 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peculiar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph